Tripple Band Polarization Insensitive Ultra Thin Metamaterial Absorber for EMC and RCS Reduction in X-Band Applications

Author(s):  
Gaurav Saxena ◽  
R L Yadava ◽  
Priyanka Jain ◽  
Y K Awasthi
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 2443-2448
Author(s):  
M. G. Mustapha ◽  
M. K. A. Rahim ◽  
N. A. Murad ◽  
O. Ayop ◽  
S. Tuntrakool ◽  
...  

A unit cell of squared shaped polarization-insensitive switchable metamaterial absorber/reflector is presented. The structure operates at 10.20 GHz under both absorber mode and reflector mode configurations. Copper wire bridging the gaps to form a circular shape structure were used as switches for operation mode selections. The structure was designed on an FR4 substrate, and the incidental wave angles were varied from 0 to 50 degrees. The structure demonstrated almost 100% absorption at resonance, 3.314 GHz percentage bandwidth at 80% as an absorber. On the other hand, as reflector, it demonstrated almost a 90% reflection and a usable bandwidth of 3.327 GHz.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia-Qi Feng ◽  
Wei-Dong Hu ◽  
Qing-Le Zhang ◽  
Hua Zong ◽  
Hui Huang ◽  
...  

We present the design, simulation, and measurement of a polarization-independent and angle-insensitive metamaterial absorber (MA) in X-band. Since the unit cell of the MA consists of four subwavelength split-ring resonators with 4-fold symmetric rotation, the MA is insensitive to the variation of both polarization and incident angle of the planar electromagnetic wave. The electromagnetic performances of the MA are studied by full-wave simulations based on finite-element method and the Naval Research Laboratory arch experimental measurements. The electric field distributions are numerically investigated, which confirm the polarization-insensitive property of the MA, as expected from the symmetric nature of the structure. When the incident angles vary from 0 to 45 degrees, the MA remains at full width at half maximum of 0.4 GHz (0.5 GHz) with peak absorptions of 99.9% (95.2%) at 10.27 GHz (10.3 GHz) by simulations (measurements).


2016 ◽  
Vol 58 (10) ◽  
pp. 2481-2485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sreenath Reddy Thummaluru ◽  
Naveen Mishra ◽  
Raghvendra Kumar Chaudhary

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document