AbstractIn treating plane wave scattering by a periodic surface, Lord Rayleigh (10) assumed that the discrete, outgoing and evanescent plane wave representation for the scattered field was valid on the surface itself. Recently, this Rayleigh assumption has been questioned and criticized. For the surface y = b cos kx on which the total field vanishes, Petit and Cadilhac(8) have demonstrated its invalidity when Kb > 0·448. The present paper discusses scattering of a wave, incident from y > 0, by an analytic periodic surface y = f(x) ( – ∞ < x < ∞), and shows that the Rayleigh assumption is valid if and only if the solution can be continued analytically across the boundary at least to the line y = minf(x). Conformal mapping and results relating to the analytic continuation of solutions to elliptic partial differential equations reduce the problem to one involving the location of singularities and critical points of a potential Green's function. Provided that the perturbation of the surface from a plane is sufficiently gentle, the validity of the Rayleigh assumption is established. For the surface y = b cos kx it is shown that the assumption is valid if Kb < γ, where γ is a positive number no greater than 0·448, the precise value of which is unknown. Possible extensions of the analysis to different or more general situations are suggested.
Ultrasonic Scattered Field Distribution of One and Two Cylindrical Solids with Phased Array Technique
