A Safe Longitudinal Control for Adaptive Cruise Control and Stop-and-Go Scenarios

2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 246-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
John-Jairo Martinez ◽  
Carlos Canudas-de-Wit
Author(s):  
K Yi ◽  
N Ryu ◽  
H J Yoon ◽  
K Huh ◽  
D Cho ◽  
...  

Implementation and vehicle tests of a vehicle longitudinal control algorithm for stop-and-go cruise control have been performed. The vehicle longitudinal control scheme consists of a set-speed control algorithm, a speed control algorithm, and a distance control algorithm. A desired acceleration for the vehicle for the control of vehicle-to-vehicle relative speed and clearance has been designed using linear quadratic optimal control theory. Performance of the control algorithm has been investigated via vehicle tests. Vehicle tests have been conducted using two test vehicles. A 2000 cm3 passenger car equipped with a radar distance sensor, throttle/brake actuators and a controller has been used as a subject vehicle in the vehicle tests. A millimetre wave radar sensor has been used for distance measurement. A step motor and an electronic vacuum booster have been used for throttle/brake actuators. It has been shown that the implemented vehicle longitudinal control system can provide satisfactory performance in vehicle set-speed control and vehicle clearance control at lower speeds.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noah J. Goodall ◽  
Chien-Lun Lan

Computer-driven vehicles will behave differently from human-driven vehicles due to changes in perception abilities, precision control, and reaction times. These changes are expected to have profound impacts on capacity, yet few models of automated driving are based on empirical measurements of computer-driven vehicles in real traffic. To this end, this paper investigates characteristics of an early form of longitudinal control automation, a commercially available adaptive cruise control (ACC) system driven in real traffic. Two car-following models were calibrated to a vehicle with ACC. First, the Intelligent Driver Model was reformulated to comply with ACC design standards then calibrated to match speed and range data from the test vehicle. The vehicle with ACC was found to decelerate less severely than predicted by the model when tested in severe braking and unimpeded acceleration scenarios. Second, the Wiedemann 99 model was calibrated because it is the default car-following model in the traffic microsimulation software program Vissim and can therefore be implemented cheaply and quickly in sophisticated models of roadways worldwide. Four parameters of the Wiedemann 99 model were measured directly from field observations of the test vehicle: standstill distance, start-up time, unimpeded acceleration profile, and maximum desired deceleration. Simulation results in Vissim were found to match the adaptive cruise control in unimpeded acceleration tests. These findings will benefit researchers and modelers seeking more accurate models of car-following behavior with adaptive cruise control and automated longitudinal control.


Author(s):  
Julian Brinkley ◽  
Jerone Dunbar ◽  
J. David Smith ◽  
Juan E. Gilbert

While adaptive cruise control (ACC) systems have been broadly few studies have investigated the user experience characteristics of recent production systems. The present study was designed for the express purpose of testing one such system. Nineteen participants drove a 2014 BMW X-5 M, equipped with adaptive cruise control, in two scenarios designed to be representative of the usage scenarios described by the vehicle manufacturer. During testing, user interactions with the system were recorded while opinions regarding the usability and operation of the system were elicited through a series of interviews and questionnaires. While participants responded favorably to the system conceptually, participants expressed considerable dissatisfaction with the ACC’s braking behavior and with specific aspects of the system’s user interface. These findings add to a growing body of research that suggests that mode confusion or insufficient awareness of system status may be a significant impediment to the use of ACC systems generally.


Author(s):  
Ian J. Reagan ◽  
David G. Kidd ◽  
Jessica B. Cicchino

Little is known about how consumers interact with driving automation technology that controls steering, speed, or headway in production vehicles. Forty-eight Insurance Institute for Highway Safety employees used a Honda Civic, Infiniti QX60, Toyota Prius, or Audi A4 or Q7 as a personal vehicle for up to several weeks and completed surveys about their experiences. Agreement about whether adaptive cruise control (ACC) or active lane keeping (ALK) improved driving experience varied significantly among vehicles. The Q7’s ACC improved the driving experience significantly more than its ALK. The Civic’s ALK improved the driving experience more than the Q7’s system, but this effect only approached significance. Drivers were most comfortable using systems on free-flowing interstates and least comfortable using ACC in stop-and-go traffic and ALK on curvy roads. The findings show a range of qualitative differences in driving automation technologies and that use of current technologies likely is limited to low-demand conditions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document