Investigation of Hole-Blocking Contacts for High-Conversion-Gain Amorphous Selenium Detectors for X-Ray Imaging

2012 ◽  
Vol 59 (9) ◽  
pp. 2403-2409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiva Abbaszadeh ◽  
Nicholas Allec ◽  
Sina Ghanbarzadeh ◽  
Umar Shafique ◽  
Karim S. Karim
1996 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 557-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Fahrig ◽  
J. A. Rowlands ◽  
Martin J. Yaffe

2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (12) ◽  
pp. 4654-4663 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. C. Hunt ◽  
Kenkichi Tanioka ◽  
J. A. Rowlands

1991 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 421-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Rowlands ◽  
D. M. Hunter ◽  
N. Araj

10.2172/7278 ◽  
1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Fugina ◽  
J Haskins ◽  
T Lavietes ◽  
C Logan ◽  
K Morales ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 1065-1069 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Rowlands ◽  
G. DeCrescenzo ◽  
N. Araj

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Wang ◽  
Mohammad Y. Yazdandoost ◽  
Rasoul Keshavarzi ◽  
Kyung-Wook Shin ◽  
Christos Hristovski ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 124-126 ◽  
pp. 507-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Koon Park ◽  
Sang Sik Kang ◽  
Sung Ho Cho ◽  
So Yeong Kim ◽  
Dae Woong Son ◽  
...  

In this paper, we present the imaging parameters and compare both mercuric iodide (HgI2) and amorphous selenium (a-Se) films. Using MCNPX code, we designed the film structure and its thickness for the optimized detector in the diagnostic x-ray range. The mercuric iodide film was formed by a wet binder process, while the amorphous selenium film was deposited by physical vapor deposition (PVD). These deposition methods are capable of being scaled up to sizes required in diagnostic imaging applications. The electronic properties are investigated using dark current, x-ray sensitivity and signal to noise ratio (SNR). From our results, the developed HgI2 film as an alternative to a-Se photoconductor, which is in practical use in flat panel x-ray imaging detector, will prove its usefulness in the future design and the optimization for various diagnostic modalities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document