scholarly journals Single Channel ECG for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Severity Detection Using a Deep Learning Approach

Author(s):  
Nannapas Banluesombatkul ◽  
Thanawin Rakthanmanon ◽  
Theerawit Wilaiprasitporn
SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A236-A236
Author(s):  
A Guillot ◽  
T Moutakanni ◽  
M Harris ◽  
P J Arnal ◽  
V Thorey

Abstract Introduction Polysomnography (PSG) is the gold-standard to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). OSA severity diagnosis is defined by the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) defined as the number of apnea and hypopnea events measured per hour of sleep. The Dreem2 headband (DH) is a self-administered, easy to use device that measure EEG, breathing frequency, heart rate and sound at-home. In our study, we assessed the performance of the DH to automatically detects OSA compared to 3 sleep’s experts scoring on PSG. Methods 41 subjects (8 females, 42.6 ± 13.7 y.o.) having a suspicion of OSA performed a night at-home wearing both a PSG and the DH. Each PSG record was scored for apnea and hypopnea events by 3 independent trained sleep experts following AASM guidelines. The deep learning approach DOSED, was trained on the DH signals using the manual apnea scoring. 10-fold cross-validation was used to provide predictions for each of the 41 subjects with the DH. Results We observed an average AHI expert’s scoring of 13.6 ± 10.1 CI[10.5, 16.5] compared to 12.9 ± 10.3 CI[9.6, 15.8] for the DH. Both, the correlation between the 3 scorers (r= 0.88, p < 0.001) and the DH and the scorers (r=0.79, p< 0.001) were significant. The specificity and sensitivity to detect mild OSA (AHI ≤ 5) was 84.4 % and 96.4 % for the DH and 86.5 % and 86.0% for the scorers. Conclusion The results show that the DH using deep learning can detect OSA with an accuracy similar to the sleep experts. The use of DH paves the way for longitudinal monitoring of patients with a suspicion of OSA and its accessibility could lead to better screening of the general population. Support This Study has been supported by Dreem sas.


Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1337-P
Author(s):  
SIRIMON REUTRAKUL ◽  
NARICHA CHIRAKALWASAN ◽  
SURANUT CHAROENSRI ◽  
SOMVANG AMNAKKITTIKUL ◽  
SUNEE SAETUNG ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Henri Korkalainen ◽  
Timo Leppanen ◽  
Juhani Aakko ◽  
Sami Nikkonen ◽  
Samu Kainulainen ◽  
...  

SLEEP ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. A230-A230
Author(s):  
NJ Scalzitti ◽  
SW Nielsen ◽  
GR Dion ◽  
MS Brock ◽  
PD O’Connor

SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. A161-A162
Author(s):  
Soonhyun Yook ◽  
Chaitanya Gupte ◽  
Zhixian Han ◽  
Eun Yeon Joo ◽  
Hea Ree Park ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Using deep learning algorithms, we investigated univariate and multivariate effects of four polysomnography features including heart rate (HR), electrocardiogram (ECG), oxygen saturation (SpO2) and nasal air flow (NAF) on the identification of sleep apnea and hypopnea events. This explanatory analysis that may clarify the sensitivity and specificity of those features to SAs and SHs have not been probed. Methods We studied 804 polysomonography samples from 704 patients with obstructive sleep apnea and 100 controls. The input data were converted into scalograms as 4-channel 2D images to train Xception networks. For training, 77,638 patches were sampled from the original 6-hour sleep data with 30-second time width. A 10% of these patches were segregated as the test-set. With each feature sets, we tested the following classifications: 1) normal vs apnea vs hypopnea; 2) normal vs. apnea+hypopnea; 3) normal vs. apnea; and 4) normal vs. hypopnea. Results SpO2 classified normal vs. apnea most accurately (98%), followed by NAF (85%), ECG (77%), and HR (63%). SpO2 also showed the highest accuracy in classifying normal vs. hypopnea (87%), and normal vs. apnea+hypopnea (96%) and three groups (82%). When the combination of four features were used, the classification accuracies were generally improved compared to use of SpO2 only (normal vs. apnea 99%; vs. hypopnea 89%; vs. apnea+hypopnea: 94%; three groups: 86%). Conclusion Deep learning with SpO2 or NAF feature most accurately classified apneas from normal sleep events, suggesting these features’ characterization of sleep apnea events. Oxygen desaturation, which is a typical pattern of hypopnea, was only the feature showing reliable accuracy in classifying hypopnea vs. normal. Nevertheless, combination of four polysomnography features could improve the identification of sleep apnea and hypopnea. Furthermore, classifying normal vs. apnea+hypopnea was more accurate than separately classifying three groups, suggesting deep learning approaches as the primary screen tool. Since the classification accuracy of using SpO2 was higher than any other features, developing a portable equipment measuring SpO2 and running deep learning algorithms has the potential for inexpensive, accurate diagnostics of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Support (if any) This study was supported by USC STEVENS CENTER FOR INNOVATION TECHNOLOGY ADVANCEMENT GRANTS (TAG), BrightFocus Foundation Award (A2019052S).


Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (22) ◽  
pp. 6481
Author(s):  
Kristin McClure ◽  
Brett Erdreich ◽  
Jason H. T. Bates ◽  
Ryan S. McGinnis ◽  
Axel Masquelin ◽  
...  

Rapid assessment of breathing patterns is important for several emergency medical situations. In this research, we developed a non-invasive breathing analysis system that automatically detects different types of breathing patterns of clinical significance. Accelerometer and gyroscopic data were collected from light-weight wireless sensors placed on the chest and abdomen of 100 normal volunteers who simulated various breathing events (central sleep apnea, coughing, obstructive sleep apnea, sighing, and yawning). We then constructed synthetic datasets by injecting annotated examples of the various patterns into segments of normal breathing. A one-dimensional convolutional neural network was implemented to detect the location of each event in each synthetic dataset and to classify it as belonging to one of the above event types. We achieved a mean F1 score of 92% for normal breathing, 87% for central sleep apnea, 72% for coughing, 51% for obstructive sleep apnea, 57% for sighing, and 63% for yawning. These results demonstrate that using deep learning to analyze chest and abdomen movement data from wearable sensors provides an unobtrusive means of monitoring the breathing pattern. This could have application in a number of critical medical situations such as detecting apneas during sleep at home and monitoring breathing events in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document