Computer Aided Classification of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions using Maximum Response 8 Filter Bank and Genetic Algorithm

Author(s):  
Chiranjib Bhowmick ◽  
Pranab Kumar Dutta ◽  
Manjunatha Mahadevappa
2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neha Bhooshan ◽  
Maryellen Giger ◽  
Milica Medved ◽  
Hui Li ◽  
Abbie Wood ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simin Wang ◽  
Ning Mao ◽  
Shaofeng Duan ◽  
Qin Li ◽  
Ruimin Li ◽  
...  

Objective: A limited number of studies have focused on the radiomic analysis of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM). We aimed to construct several radiomics-based models of CEM for classifying benign and malignant breast lesions.Materials and Methods: The retrospective, double-center study included women who underwent CEM between November 2013 and February 2020. Radiomic analysis was performed using high-energy (HE), low-energy (LE), and dual-energy subtraction (DES) images from CEM. Datasets were randomly divided into the training and testing sets at a ratio of 7:3. The maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) method and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression were used to select the radiomic features and construct the best classification models. The performances of the models were assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Leave-group-out cross-validation (LGOCV) for 100 rounds was performed to obtain the mean AUCs, which were compared by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and the Kruskal–Wallis rank-sum test.Results: A total of 192 women with 226 breast lesions (101 benign; 125 malignant) were enrolled. The median age was 48 years (range, 22–70 years). For the classification of breast lesions, the AUCs of the best models were 0.931 (95% CI: 0.873–0.989) for HE, 0.897 (95% CI: 0.807–0.981) for LE, 0.882 (95% CI: 0.825–0.987) for DES images and 0.960 (95% CI: 0.910–0.998) for all of the CEM images in the testing set. According to LGOCV, the models constructed with the HE images and all of the CEM images showed the highest mean AUCs for the training (0.931 and 0.938, respectively; P < 0.05 for both) and testing sets (0.892 and 0.889, respectively; P = 0.55 for both), which were significantly higher than those of the two models constructed with the LE and DES images in the training (0.912 and 0.899, respectively; all P < 0.05) and testing sets (0.866 and 0.862, respectively; all P < 0.05).Conclusions: Radiomic analysis of CEM images was valuable for classifying benign and malignant breast lesions. The use of HE images or all three types of CEM images can achieve the best performance.


Author(s):  
K. Sangeethapriya ◽  
Josephin Arockia Dhivya ◽  
T. R. Thamizhvani ◽  
R. J. Hemalatha

2010 ◽  
Vol 195 (6) ◽  
pp. 1460-1465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Woo Kyung Moon ◽  
Ji Won Choi ◽  
Nariya Cho ◽  
Sang Hee Park ◽  
Jung Min Chang ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 240 (2) ◽  
pp. 357-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karla Horsch ◽  
Maryellen L. Giger ◽  
Carl J. Vyborny ◽  
Li Lan ◽  
Ellen B. Mendelson ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 230 (3) ◽  
pp. 820-823 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shalom S. Buchbinder ◽  
Isaac S. Leichter ◽  
Richard B. Lederman ◽  
Boris Novak ◽  
Philippe N. Bamberger ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 36 (08) ◽  
pp. 282-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Atasever ◽  
A. Özdemir ◽  
I. Öznur ◽  
N. I. Karabacak ◽  
N. Gökçora ◽  
...  

Summary Aim: Our goal was to determine the clinical usefulness of TI-201 to identify breast cancer in patients with suspicious breast lesions on clinical examination, and/or abnormal radiologic (mammography and/or ultrasonography) findings. Methods: TI-201 scintigraphy were performed in sixty-eight patients with 70 breast abnormalities (51 palpable, 19 nonpalpable) and compared with mammography and ultrasonography (US). Early (15 min) and late (3 h) images of the breasts were obtained following the injection of 111 MBq (3 mCi) of TI-201. Visual and semiquantitative interpretation was performed. Results: Final diagnosis confirmed 52 malignant breast lesions and 18 benign conditions. TI-201 visualized 47 of 52 (90%) overall malignant lesions. Thirty-eight of 40 (95%) palpable and 9 of 12 (75%) nonpalpable breast cancers were detected by TI-201 scintigraphy. The smallest mass lesion detected by TI-201 measured 1.5x1.0 cm. Eleven breast lesions were interpreted as indeterminate by mammography and/or sonography. TI-201 scintigraphy excluded malignancy in 7 of 8 (88%) patients with benign breast lesions interpreted as indeterminate. Five of the 18 (28%) benign breast lesions showed TI-201 uptake. None of the fibroadenoma and fibrocystic changes accumulated TI-201. TI-201 scintigraphy, mammography and ultrasonography showed 90%, 92%, 85% overall sensitivity and 72%, 56%, 61% overall specificity respectively. Twenty-one of the 28 (75%) axillary nodal metastatic sites were also detected by TI-201. In malignant and benign lesions, early and late lesion/contralateral normal side (L/N) ratios were 1.58 ± 0.38 (mean ± SD) and 1.48 ± 0.32 (p >0.05), 1.87 ± 0.65 and 1.34 ± 0.20 (p<0.05) respectively. The mean early and late L/N ratios of malignant and benign groups did not show statistical difference (p>0.05). Conclusion: Overall, TI-201 scintigraphy was the most specific of the three methods and yielded favourable results in palpable breast cancers, while it showed lower sensitivity in nonpalpable cancers and axillary metastases. Combined use of TI-201 scintigraphy with mammography and US seems to be useful in difficult cases, such as dense breasts and indeterminate breast lesions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document