scholarly journals Adversarial Spatio-Temporal Learning for Video Deblurring

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 291-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaihao Zhang ◽  
Wenhan Luo ◽  
Yiran Zhong ◽  
Lin Ma ◽  
Wei Liu ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Ching-Hang Chen ◽  
Tyng-Luh Liu ◽  
Yu-Shuen Wang ◽  
Hung-Kuo Chu ◽  
Nick C. Tang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 447-456
Author(s):  
Matthias Seibold ◽  
Armando Hoch ◽  
Daniel Suter ◽  
Mazda Farshad ◽  
Patrick O. Zingg ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mei Chee Leong ◽  
Dilip K. Prasad ◽  
Yong Tsui Lee ◽  
Feng Lin

This paper introduces a fusion convolutional architecture for efficient learning of spatio-temporal features in video action recognition. Unlike 2D convolutional neural networks (CNNs), 3D CNNs can be applied directly on consecutive frames to extract spatio-temporal features. The aim of this work is to fuse the convolution layers from 2D and 3D CNNs to allow temporal encoding with fewer parameters than 3D CNNs. We adopt transfer learning from pre-trained 2D CNNs for spatial extraction, followed by temporal encoding, before connecting to 3D convolution layers at the top of the architecture. We construct our fusion architecture, semi-CNN, based on three popular models: VGG-16, ResNets and DenseNets, and compare the performance with their corresponding 3D models. Our empirical results evaluated on the action recognition dataset UCF-101 demonstrate that our fusion of 1D, 2D and 3D convolutions outperforms its 3D model of the same depth, with fewer parameters and reduces overfitting. Our semi-CNN architecture achieved an average of 16–30% boost in the top-1 accuracy when evaluated on an input video of 16 frames.


1999 ◽  
Vol 202 (14) ◽  
pp. 1897-1907 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Schatz ◽  
J.P. Lachaud ◽  
G. Beugnon

We tested, under field and laboratory conditions, whether the neotropical ant Ectatomma ruidum Roger can learn several associations between temporal and spatial changes in the daily pattern of food availability. Honey was shuffled between two or three feeding sites following a fixed daily schedule. Foragers learnt to associate particular sites with the specific times at which food was available, individually marked ants being observed on the correct sites at the correct times. Some ants anticipated the time of food delivery by approximately 30 min, and it was not necessary for them to be rewarded at the first stage of the sequence of food collection to continue their search for honey according to the correct schedule of reward. Ants also followed the same schedule when no honey was supplied at each stage of the sequence, and they stayed at the expected unrewarded site for a period equivalent to the reward period of the corresponding training phase, indicating that they had learnt when and for how long the food was available. Thus, ants rely on their spatio-temporal memory rather than on local cues coming from the honey source to guide them.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document