Mechanisms of Motor Recovery in Chronic and Subacute Stroke Patients Following a Robot-Aided Training

Background. The study investigated whether passive splinting or active motor training as either individualized best conventional therapy or as standardized impairment-oriented training (IOT) would be superior in promoting motor recovery in subacute stroke patients with mildly or severely paretic arms. Methods. A total of 148 anterior circulation ischemic stroke patients were randomly assigned to 45 minutes of additional daily arm therapy over 3 to 4 weeks as either ( a) passive therapy with inflatable splints or active arm motor therapy as either ( b) individualized best conventional therapy (CONV) or ( c) standardized IOT, that is Arm BASIS training for severe paresis or Arm Ability training for mild paresis. Main outcome measures included the following: Fugl-Meyer arm motor score (severely paretic arms) and the TEMPA time scores (mildly affected arms). Pre—post (immediate effects) and pre—4 weeks follow-up analyses (long-term effects) were performed. Results. Overall improvements were documented (mean baseline and change scores efficacy: Fugl-Meyer, arm motor scores, 24.4, +9.1 points; TEMPA, 119, −26.6 seconds; P < .0001), but with no differential effects between splint therapy and the combined active motor rehabilitation groups. Both efficacy and effectiveness analyses indicated, however, bigger immediate motor improvements after IOT as compared with best conventional therapy (Fugl-Meyer, arm motor scores: IOT +12.3, CONV +9.2 points; TEMPA: IOT −31.1 seconds, CONV −20.5 seconds; P = .0363); for mildly affected patients long-term effects could also be substantiated. Conclusions. Specificity of active training seemed more important for motor recovery than intensity (therapy time). The comprehensive modular IOT approach promoted motor recovery in patients with either severe or mild arm paresis.

Download Full-text

Camera-Based Mirror Visual Input for Priming Promotes Motor Recovery, Daily Function, and Brain Network Segregation in Subacute Stroke Patients

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair ◽

10.1177/1545968319836207 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 33 (4) ◽

pp. 307-318 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Li Ding ◽

Xu Wang ◽

Shugeng Chen ◽

Hewei Wang ◽

Jing Tian ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Functional Independence ◽

Brain Network ◽

Motor Recovery ◽

Clustering Coefficient ◽

Manual Muscle Testing ◽

Stroke Patients ◽

Muscle Testing ◽

Subacute Stroke ◽

Before And After ◽

Daily Function

Background. Camera technique–based mirror visual feedback (MVF) is an optimal interface for mirror therapy. However, its efficiency for stroke rehabilitation and the underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear. Objective. To investigate the possible treatment benefits of camera-based MVF (camMVF) for priming prior to hand function exercise in subacute stroke patients, and to reveal topological reorganization of brain network in response to the intervention. Methods. Twenty subacute stroke patients were assigned randomly to the camMVF group (MG, N = 10) or a conventional group (CG, N = 10). Before, and after 2 and 4 weeks of intervention, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Limb subscale (FMA_UL), the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), the modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), manual muscle testing (MMT), and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) were measured. Resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) signals were recorded before and after 4-week intervention. Results. The MG showed more improvements in the FMA_UL, the FMA_WH (wrist and hand), and the FIM than the CG. The clustering coefficient (CC) of the resting EEG network in the alpha band was increased globally in the MG after intervention but not in the CG. Nodal CC analyses revealed that the CC in the MG tended to increase in the ipsilesional occipital and temporal areas, and the bilateral central and parietal areas, suggesting improved local efficiency of communication in the visual, somatosensory, and motor areas. The changes of nodal CC at TP8 and PO8 were significantly positively correlated with the motor recovery. Conclusions. The camMVF-based priming could improve the motor recovery, daily function, and brain network segregation in subacute stroke patients.

Download Full-text

Action Observation Therapy for Upper Limb Recovery in Patients with Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

Brain Sciences ◽

10.3390/brainsci11030290 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (3) ◽

pp. 290

Author(s):

Mauro Mancuso ◽

Serena Di Tondo ◽

Enza Costantini ◽

Alessio Damora ◽

Patrizio Sale ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Upper Limb ◽

Action Observation ◽

Functional Independence Measure ◽

Functional Independence ◽

Motor Recovery ◽

Control Group ◽

Stroke Patients ◽

Rehabilitative Treatment ◽

Subacute Stroke ◽

The Moment

Due to the complexity of the interventions for upper limb recovery, at the moment there is a lack of evidence regarding innovative and effective rehabilitative interventions. Action Observation Training (AOT) constitutes a promising rehabilitative method to improve upper limb motor recovery in stroke patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the potential efficacy of AOT, both in upper limb recovery and in functional outcomes when compared to patients treated with task oriented training (TOT). Both treatments were added to traditional rehabilitative treatment. Thirty-two acute stroke patients at 15.6 days (±8.3) from onset, with moderate to severe upper limb impairment at baseline following their first-ever stroke, were enrolled and randomized into two groups: 16 in the experimental group (EG) and 16 in the control group (CG). The EG underwent 30 min sessions of AOT, and the CG underwent 30 min sessions of TOT. All participants received 20 sessions of treatment for four consecutive weeks (five days/week). The Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Box and Block Test (BBT), Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) were administered at baseline (T0) and at the end of treatment (T1). No statistical differences were found at T0 for inclusion criteria between the CG and EG, whereas both groups improved significantly at T1. After the treatment period, the rehabilitative gain was greater in the EG compared to the CG for FMA-UE and FIM (all p < 0.05). Our results suggest that AOT can contribute to increased motor recovery in subacute stroke patients with moderate to severe upper limb impairment in the early phase after stroke. The improvements presented in this article, together with the lack of adverse events, confirm that the use of AOT should be broadened out to larger pools of subacute stroke patients.

Download Full-text