A State Census of Unsubmitted Sexual Assault Kits: Comparing Forensic DNA Testing Outcomes by Geographic and Population Density Characteristics*

2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 1820-1827
Author(s):  
Rebecca Campbell ◽  
McKenzie Javorka ◽  
Dhruv B. Sharma ◽  
Katie Gregory ◽  
Matt Opsommer ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 379-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Campbell ◽  
Jessica Shaw ◽  
Giannina Fehler-Cabral

Throughout the United States, hundreds of thousands of sexual assault kits (SAKs) have not been submitted by the police for forensic DNA testing, which raises complex issues regarding how victims ought to be notified about what happened to their kits. In this project, we evaluated a victim-centered, trauma-informed victim notification protocol that was implemented in Detroit, Michigan. Most victims (84%) did not have a strong negative emotional reaction to notification, and most (57%) decided to reengage with the criminal justice system. Victims of nonstranger sexual assaults were less likely to reengage postnotification compared with victims of stranger rape.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 100133
Author(s):  
Jae Joseph Russell B. Rodriguez ◽  
Rita P. Laude ◽  
Maria Corazon A. De Ungria

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-61
Author(s):  
Vishal Somnay ◽  
Thomas Duong ◽  
Ray-Young Tsao ◽  
Joseph A. Prahlow

Forensic DNA testing can play a critical role in homicide investigations. Selecting the appropriate evidence on which to perform DNA testing requires foresight and reasoning based on experience and science. Although successful DNA testing can occur using many substrates, including blood, hair, and sweat/epithelial cells, positive results can also result from testing various unorthodox samples. The authors report on a triple-murder investigation where DNA testing of dog feces at the crime scene matched DNA testing of feces found on the shoe of a suspect resulting in successful prosecution of the case.


Author(s):  
Rohit Saluja ◽  
Pankaj Shrivastava ◽  
Swapnil Sinha

2007 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Butler ◽  
Michael D. Coble ◽  
Peter M. Vallone

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.S. Buckleton ◽  
M. Krawczak ◽  
B.S. Weir

1995 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 13786J ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Christian Boles ◽  
Clyde C. Snow ◽  
Eric Stover

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document