Color Change of the Snapper (Pagrus auratus) and Gurnard (Chelidonichthys kumu) Skin and Eyes during Storage: Effect of Light Polarization and Contact with Ice

2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (12) ◽  
pp. E2456-E2462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murat O. Balaban ◽  
Kelsie Stewart ◽  
Graham C. Fletcher ◽  
Zayde Alçiçek
2011 ◽  
Vol 60 (6) ◽  
pp. 064209
Author(s):  
Zhang Er-Feng ◽  
Dai Hong-Yi

1990 ◽  
Vol 169 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Yoshinobu ◽  
Xingcai Guo ◽  
John T. Yates

1985 ◽  
Vol 53 (8) ◽  
pp. 783-786 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. Racey ◽  
P. Rochon ◽  
N. Gauthier

Open Physics ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andris Ozols ◽  
Valdis Kokars ◽  
Peteris Augustovs ◽  
Ilze Uiska ◽  
Kaspars Traskovskis ◽  
...  

AbstractLight polarization effects on a holographic grating recording in a glassy chalcogenide a-As40S15Se45 film has been experimentally studied and compared with previously studied glassy molecular azobenzene film 8a at 633, using s − s,p − p, CE-1 and CE-2 circular-elliptic recording-beam polarizations (differing by light electric field rotation directions). The azocompound exhibited much higher self-diffraction efficiency (SDE) and diffraction efficiency whereas chalcogenide was more sensitive. Their recording efficiency polarization dependences also were different. SDE up to 45% was achieved in 8a with p − p and up to 2.6% in a-As40S15Se45 with CE-2 polarized recording beams. The polarization changes in the diffraction process were studied as well in these and other materials (11, 16, 19 and a-As2S3 film, LiTaO3:Fe crystal). It was found that light polarization changes in the process of diffraction from gratings recorded vectorially by s−p polarizations depended on chemical composition, wavelength, and exposure time. Vector gratings with SDE up to 25% were recorded in 8a, rotating a linear polarization by 90°. No light polarization changes were found in azobenzene 19 and chalcogenide films and in LiTaO3:Fe crystal, thus showing a vector recording of scalar holograms. The recording mechanisms in azocompounds and chalcogenides are discussed and compared.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (13) ◽  
pp. e10101320813
Author(s):  
May Anny Alves Fraga ◽  
João Pedro Castello Marcatto ◽  
Talita Malini Carletti ◽  
Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho ◽  
Américo Bortolazzo Correr

This study aimed to verify the effect of light and heat on bleaching action of 40% hydrogen peroxide (Opalescence Boost PF – Ultradent, BR). Thirty-three bovine incisors were submitted to in-office dental bleaching and divided into three groups (n=11): CO group – control, no light or heat; CA group – heat with a hairdryer; LC group – light and heat with a photoactivation device. For this, a gingival barrier (OpalDam – Ultradent, SP, BR) isolated a circular area around the flatter region of the crown. Afterwards, the bleaching gel was applied for 15 minutes and repeated twice, totaling 45 minutes of application. For the CA and LC groups, the heat source was maintained during the application of the bleaching gel. Temperature was standardized in 5°C for both groups and monitored using a thermocouple inserted into the pulp chamber. The color measurement was performed before and after bleaching using a spectrophotometer. The inner margin of the isolated area of each dental crown was equivalent to the tip of the spectrophotometer (4 mm). Color change was verified by CIEDE2000 system (ΔE00). One way ANOVA and Tukey's test were used to analyze data (p-values set to 5%). The values of ΔE00 were equal for LC (2,66±0,29) and CA (2,44±0,88), and both were higher than CO (1,31±0,37). Therefore, light does not play a fundamental role for in-office dental bleaching. Same dental bleaching outcomes are obtained using different heat sources.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document