Enhancing Efficacy of Water Quality Trading with Automation: A Case Study in Virginia’s Nutrient Trading Program

Author(s):  
Linnea Saby ◽  
Jonathan L. Goodall ◽  
Lawrence E. Band ◽  
Benjamin D. Bowes ◽  
Michelle Fults
2003 ◽  
Vol 2003 (4) ◽  
pp. 548-553
Author(s):  
Seema Chavan ◽  
Steve McDonald ◽  
Carollo Engineers ◽  
Walnut Creek ◽  
Greg Dennis ◽  
...  

Water Policy ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia Morgan ◽  
Ann Wolverton

This paper provides a systematic overview of water quality trading programs and one-time offset agreements in the USA. The primary source of information for this overview is a detailed database, collected and compiled by a team of researchers at Dartmouth College. Details discussed include: sources of the pollutant, types of pollutants traded, legal liability, main regulatory drivers, market structure, trading ratios, transaction and administrative costs and difficulties encountered in trading. We find that trading has often been explored as a way to meet more stringent discharge limits or watershed-wide caps. The most common type of trading program in the United States is between point sources and non-point sources. Point sources are usually held liable for non-point source reductions. The pollutants most commonly traded in the USA are nutrients such as phosphorus and nitrogen and almost all offset and trading programs focus on one pollutant only. However, market structures, trading ratios and other details of the trading framework vary widely among programs. No single characteristic appears to be a good predictor of a successful trading program.


2017 ◽  
Vol 193 ◽  
pp. 483-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marzieh Motallebi ◽  
Dana L. Hoag ◽  
Ali Tasdighi ◽  
Mazdak Arabi ◽  
Deanna L. Osmond

2020 ◽  
Vol 177 ◽  
pp. 106762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua M. Duke ◽  
Hongxing Liu ◽  
Tyler Monteith ◽  
Joshua McGrath ◽  
Nicole M. Fiorellino

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document