Enlightenment of the Mariana Fore Arc Sedimentary Basin Evolution to the Subduction Process Study

Author(s):  
Lei XING ◽  
Qianqian LI ◽  
Qingwei MENG ◽  
Huaishan LIU ◽  
Jia WEI ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Theunissen ◽  
Ritske Huismans ◽  
Frank Despinois ◽  
Jean-Claude Ringenbach ◽  
François Sapin

<p>Here we use observations from the central South Atlantic conjugate margins to constrain the structural style of rifting and its relation with sedimentary basin evolution during the syn and early post-rift. Three synthetics transects from North (Gabon-Brazil) to South (Angola-Brazil) are used to constrain fault distribution, margin width, crustal thickness, distribution of magmatism, syn-rift sedimentary section thickness and paleo-environment from the start of rifting in the Berriasian (145 Ma) until the early post rift in the Aptian (113 Ma). This integrated study aims to understand variations in along strike structural style, magmatic output, and sedimentary basin evolution to assess the contribution of mantle processes on topography using forward 2-D thermo-mechanical modelling. We design a model setup that reproduces South Atlantic central segment main characteristics before rifting. We then explore scenarios of lithospheric thinning where strain weakening mechanisms, degree of depletion of lithopsheric mantle and crustal rheology are the main variables. The model accounts for decompression melting with feedbacks on temperature, viscosity and density of the mantle. The subsidence in the thermo-mechanical models is calibrated with a reference ridge elevation, where a 6 km thick oceanic crust is predicted, and explained by the different contributions on buoyancy of rifted passive margin during rifting. We discuss conditions to get magma-poor margins with/without exhumed mantle at the seafloor and conditions to reach a small topographic gradient and shallow water environment between the proximal and distal domains over more than 200 km of the wide margin during most of the syn-rift.</p>


Field geologists and explorationists are of necessity immersed in numerous very detailed surface and subsurface observations. They are often perplexed by the choice of relatively simple geophysical models that so elegantly explain the origin and evolution of sedimentary basins. Geophysicists, on the other hand, search for a simple theme to explain the origin of sedimentary basins and, much like managers, are often impatient with lengthy detailed geological discourse that often uses fancy jargon to hide the very real difficulty that geologists have in separating important evidence from mere encyclopaedic description. The following musings address the quality and limitations of geologic and geophysical evidence that may be used to evaluate the relative roles of stress, thermal effects and gravity loading, which have been so lucidly summarized by M. H. P. Bott in the preceding summary. The fine papers presented during this meeting, of course, have led to significant modifications of some of my earlier thoughts. Because these have been previously published elsewhere (Bally & Snelson 1980; Bally 1980), they are summarized here only for the convenience of the reader.


1996 ◽  
Vol 268 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 23-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.M. Nikishin ◽  
P.A. Ziegler ◽  
R.A. Stephenson ◽  
S.A.P.L. Cloetingh ◽  
A.V. Furne ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Hodych ◽  
R. R. Pätzold ◽  
K. L. Buchan

We show that the oolitic hematite ores of Birmingham, Alabama, carry a remanence direction stable enough to have survived major folding. Nevertheless, this remanence was very likely acquired in the Pennsylvanian, about 130 Ma after the ore's Early Silurian deposition. This long delay is understandable if we accept the common hypothesis that the ore originated as oolitic goethite. We would then not expect acquisition of a stable remanence until deep burial in the Pennsylvanian raised the temperature to the ~80 °C probably needed to transform coarse goethite to hematite in water. Although the paleomagnetism of oolitic hematite may be of limited value in defining primary paleopoles, it may allow dating of when the ore's temperature was first raised to ~80 °C, perhaps aiding studies of sedimentary basin evolution and oil formation. Our results also support using caution in interpreting the paleomagnetism of more common red beds, emphasizing that a positive fold test is not necessarily evidence of primary remanence and that burial history may control the timing of remanence acquisition.


Author(s):  
P. M. Shannon ◽  
I. K. Sinclair ◽  
B. J. P. Williams ◽  
S. D. Harker ◽  
J. G. Moore

2011 ◽  
Vol 230 (8) ◽  
pp. 3230-3248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Longoni ◽  
A. Cristiano I. Malossi ◽  
Alfio Quarteroni ◽  
Andrea Villa ◽  
Paolo Ruffo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document