scholarly journals The 2016Academic Emergency MedicineConsensus Conference, Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: Development of a Policy-relevant Patient-centered Research Agenda
May 10, 2016, New Orleans, LA

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 1313-1319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corita R. Grudzen ◽  
Jana R. Anderson ◽  
Christopher R. Carpenter ◽  
Erik P. Hess
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
New Orleans ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centered

scholarly journals Shared Decision Making to Support the Provision of Palliative and End-of-Life Care in the Emergency Department: A Consensus Statement and Research Agenda

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 1394-1402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi R. George ◽  
Jennifer Kryworuchko ◽  
Katherine M. Hunold ◽  
Kei Ouchi ◽  
Amy Berman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Consensus Statement ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Life Care

The Role of Shared Decision-Making in Audiologic Rehabilitation

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Pryce ◽  
Amanda Hall
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Behavior Changes ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Treatment Information ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Potential Risks ◽  
Audiologic Rehabilitation

Shared decision-making (SDM), a component of patient-centered care, is the process in which the clinician and patient both participate in decision-making about treatment; information is shared between the parties and both agree with the decision. Shared decision-making is appropriate for health care conditions in which there is more than one evidence-based treatment or management option that have different benefits and risks. The patient's involvement ensures that the decisions regarding treatment are sensitive to the patient's values and preferences. Audiologic rehabilitation requires substantial behavior changes on the part of patients and includes benefits to their communication as well as compromises and potential risks. This article identifies the importance of shared decision-making in audiologic rehabilitation and the changes required to implement it effectively.

MP9-12 PATIENT-CENTERED TREATMENT DECISIONS: USING CONJOINT ANALYSIS AS AN AID FOR SHARED DECISION-MAKING FOR URETHRAL STRICTURE TREATMENT

2015 ◽  
Vol 193 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay Hampson ◽  
Thomas Gaither ◽  
Leslie Wilson ◽  
Jie Ting ◽  
Isabel Allen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Conjoint Analysis ◽  
Urethral Stricture ◽  
Treatment Decisions ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centered

Improving the Perception of Patient-Centered Wellness in a Virtual Population During the COVID-19 Pandemic

2021 ◽  
pp. JDNP-D-20-00078
Author(s):  
Sybilla Myers ◽  
Christopher Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Cognitive Theory ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Mobile App ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
The Social

BackgroundPerceived health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is fundamental to well-being and is a meaningful way to measure physical and mental health.Local ProblemNo standard method exists for measuring perceived HRQOL during the COVID-19 pandemic in participants as they attempt to improve their self-determined wellness goals. An implementation plan that considers the social distancing limitations imposed can be used to predict an individual’s likelihood of long-term success.MethodsDuring the four, 2-week plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles, the Social Cognitive Theory model informed the implementation of the four core interventions. To guide iterative changes, the data was analyzed through Excel and run charts.InterventionsThe four core interventions were the shared decision-making tool (SDMT), health mobile app tool (HMAT), wellness tracker tool (WTT), and the team engagement plan.ResultsAmong 28 participants, perceived quality of life increased by 70%, engagement in shared decision-making increased to 82%, app use and confidence increased to 85%, and goal attainment reached 81%.ConclusionsThe SDMT, health app, and wellness tracker created a methodical plan of accountability for increasing participant wellness. The contextual barrier of the COVID-19 pandemic added a negative wellness burden which was mitigated by creating a patient-centered culture of wellness.

Shared Decision Making — The Pinnacle of Patient-Centered Care

2012 ◽  
Vol 366 (9) ◽  
pp. 780-781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Barry ◽  
Susan Edgman-Levitan
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Patient Centered Care ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Centered Care

scholarly journals Perceived Appropriateness of Shared Decision-making in the Emergency Department: A Survey Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 375-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc A. Probst ◽  
Hemal K. Kanzaria ◽  
Dominick L. Frosch ◽  
Erik P. Hess ◽  
Gary Winkel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Shared Decision

scholarly journals Crafting Care That Fits: Workload and Capacity Assessments Complementing Decision Aids in Implementing Shared Decision Making (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas H Wieringa ◽  
Manuel F Sanchez-Herrera ◽  
Nataly R Espinoza ◽  
Viet-Thi Tran ◽  
Kasey Boehmer
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Decision Aids ◽  
Multiple Chronic Conditions ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Patient Goals ◽  
Minimally Disruptive Medicine ◽  
Workload Capacity

UNSTRUCTURED About 42% of adults have one or more chronic conditions and 23% have multiple chronic conditions. The coordination and integration of services for the management of patients living with multimorbidity is important for care to be efficient, safe, and less burdensome. Minimally disruptive medicine may optimize this coordination and integration. It is a patient-centered approach to care that focuses on achieving patient goals for life and health by seeking care strategies that fit a patient’s context and are minimally disruptive and maximally supportive. The cumulative complexity model practically orients minimally disruptive medicine–based care. In this model, the patient workload-capacity imbalance is the central mechanism driving patient complexity. These elements should be accounted for when making decisions for patients with chronic conditions. Therefore, in addition to decision aids, which may guide shared decision making, we propose to discuss and clarify a potential workload-capacity imbalance.

Shared Decision Making

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Apurupa Ballamudi ◽  
John Chi
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Medical Information ◽  
Decision Aids ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Risks And Benefits ◽  
Benefit Patient ◽  
Risk And Benefit

Shared decision-making (SDM) is a process in which patients and providers work together to make medical decisions with a patient-centric focus, considering available evidence, treatment options, the patient’s values and goals, and risks and benefits. It is important for all providers to understand how to effectively use SDM in their interactions with patients to improve patients’ experiences throughout their healthcare journey. There are strategies to improve communication between patients and their providers, particularly when communicating quantitative data, risks and benefits, and treatment options. Decision aids (DAs) can help patients understand complex medical information and make an informed decision. This review contains 9 figures, 4 tables and 45 references Key words: Shared decision-making, decision-making, communication, risk and benefit, patient-centered, health literacy, quality of life, decision aids, option grid, pictographs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document