Fossorial rodents and applied zooarchaeology to ecosystem conservation in Sierras of Córdoba, Argentina

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-147
Author(s):  
Matías E. Medina ◽  
Nahuel A. De Santi ◽  
Diego E. Rivero ◽  
Diego H. Verzi ◽  
Eduardo P. Tonni
Keyword(s):  
Ecosystem Conservation ◽  
Applied Zooarchaeology ◽  
Fossorial Rodents

Factors Analysis of Mangrove Forest Ecosystem Conservation Strategic In Baguala Ambon Bay District, Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. p8783
Author(s):  
Salakory Melianus ◽  
Wiclief S. Pinoa ◽  
Revalda Amanda Yacoba B. Salakory
Keyword(s):  
Forest Ecosystem ◽  
Mangrove Forest ◽  
Ecosystem Conservation ◽  
Factors Analysis

Applied Zooarchaeology

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve Wolverton ◽  
Lisa Nagaoka ◽  
Torben C. Rick
Keyword(s):  
Applied Zooarchaeology

scholarly journals Policy-driven co-evolution of the food–water–ecosystem–livelihood nexus in two ecosystem conservation hotspots in southern China

2021 ◽  
pp. e01789
Author(s):  
Changwei Zhuang ◽  
Chong Jiang ◽  
Weilian Chen ◽  
Wumeng Huang ◽  
Ji Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Southern China ◽  
Ecosystem Conservation ◽  
Water Ecosystem

Assessing the performance of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets in Brazil: a test using two regional-scale indices related to coastal and marine ecosystem conservation

Marine Policy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 67 ◽  
pp. 130-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Marques ◽  
Andrea Q. Steiner ◽  
Marcelo de Almeida Medeiros
Keyword(s):  
Marine Ecosystem ◽  
Regional Scale ◽  
Ecosystem Conservation ◽  
Aichi Biodiversity Targets

scholarly journals Tourists’ perception of marine ecosystem conservation in the Nha Trang Bay Marine Protected Area, Vietnam

Tropics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 187-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoko Kaida ◽  
Nguyet Anh Dang
Keyword(s):  
Protected Area ◽  
Marine Protected Area ◽  
Marine Ecosystem ◽  
Ecosystem Conservation ◽  
Nha Trang Bay

scholarly journals Valuing type and scope of ecosystem conservation: A meta-analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan Hjerpe ◽  
Anwar Hussain ◽  
Spencer Phillips
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Ecosystem Conservation

When payments for ecosystem conservation stop

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian Rode
Keyword(s):  
Ecosystem Conservation

Sustainability in the Brazilian pampa biome: A composite index to integrate beef production, social equity, and ecosystem conservation

2019 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 317-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Santos de Freitas ◽  
Tamara Esteves de Oliveira ◽  
Juliano Morales de Oliveira
Keyword(s):  
Composite Index ◽  
Social Equity ◽  
Beef Production ◽  
Ecosystem Conservation ◽  
Pampa Biome

scholarly journals Direct dating of Neanderthal remains from the site of Vindija Cave and implications for the Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (40) ◽  
pp. 10606-10611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thibaut Devièse ◽  
Ivor Karavanić ◽  
Daniel Comeskey ◽  
Cara Kubiak ◽  
Petra Korlević ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
High Performance Liquid Chromatography ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Upper Paleolithic ◽  
Bone Collagen ◽  
Applied Zooarchaeology ◽  
Animal Bone ◽  
Early Upper Paleolithic ◽  
Anatomically Modern Humans ◽  
Early Upper

Previous dating of the Vi-207 and Vi-208 Neanderthal remains from Vindija Cave (Croatia) led to the suggestion that Neanderthals survived there as recently as 28,000–29,000 B.P. Subsequent dating yielded older dates, interpreted as ages of at least ∼32,500 B.P. We have redated these same specimens using an approach based on the extraction of the amino acid hydroxyproline, using preparative high-performance liquid chromatography (Prep-HPLC). This method is more efficient in eliminating modern contamination in the bone collagen. The revised dates are older than 40,000 B.P., suggesting the Vindija Neanderthals did not live more recently than others across Europe, and probably predate the arrival of anatomically modern humans in Eastern Europe. We applied zooarchaeology by mass spectrometry (ZooMS) to find additional hominin remains. We identified one bone that is Neanderthal, based on its mitochondrial DNA, and dated it directly to 46,200 ± 1,500 B.P. We also attempted to date six early Upper Paleolithic bone points from stratigraphic units G1, Fd/d+G1 and Fd/d, Fd. One bone artifact gave a date of 29,500 ± 400 B.P., while the remainder yielded no collagen. We additionally dated animal bone samples from units G1 and G1–G3. These dates suggest a co-occurrence of early Upper Paleolithic osseous artifacts, particularly split-based points, alongside the remains of Neanderthals is a result of postdepositional mixing, rather than an association between the two groups, although more work is required to show this definitively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document