scholarly journals Three year real‐life outcomes from the use of the fluocinolone acetonide implant (Iluvien) in the treatment of refractory DMO

2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (S261) ◽  
pp. 60-60
Keyword(s):  
Real Life ◽  
Fluocinolone Acetonide ◽  
Life Outcomes ◽  
Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant

Switching to intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implant for refractory diabetic macular edema: 12- and 24-month results

2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212199298
Author(s):  
Argyrios Chronopoulos ◽  
Panagiotis Chronopoulos ◽  
Agharza Ashurov ◽  
Christina Korb ◽  
Norbert Pfeiffer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Fluocinolone Acetonide ◽  
Additional Treatment ◽  
Multicentric Study ◽  
Goldmann Tonometry ◽  
Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Implant ◽  
Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant

Purpose: To report visual and anatomical outcomes of chronic/refractory diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implant. Setting: Retrospective, one arm, multicentric study. Method: Between 2013 and 2018, 27 consecutive eyes of 25 patients with chronic/refractory DME were treated with a fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant. Best registered visual acuity (BRVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and Goldmann tonometry intraocular pressure (IOP) were assessed at 12 and 24 months. The need for IOP lowering treatment as well as top-up therapy during the follow-up were also assessed. Results: The duration of DME prior to treatment in our study was 54 ± 24 months. The baseline mean BRVA of 0.7 ± 0.34 logMAR improved to 0.5 ± 0.3 ( p = 0.01) at 12 months and 0.46 ± 0.3 ( p = 0.04) at 24 months. At 12 months, BRVA improved in 14 eyes (52%), stabilized in 5 eyes (20%), and decreased in 3 eyes (11%). At 24 months, BRVA improved further in 6 eyes (24%), stabilized in 3 eyes (12%), and decreased in 6 eyes (24 %). Mean CRT decreased from 497 ± 176 to 349 ± 186 μm at 12 months ( p = 0.0005) and to 267 ± 104 μm at 24 months ( p = 0.001). Only five eyes required additional treatment for DME and only three eyes required treatment for raised IOP. Discussion: Our results show that the visual and the anatomical improvements achieved by a single injection of a fluocinolone acetonide implant were maintained up to 24 months with minimal additional therapy even in eyes with a long and heavy history; however, IOP monitoring remains essential.

Late Spontaneous Dissociation of a Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant (Retisert)

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soraya Rofagha ◽  
Tidarat Prechanond ◽  
Jay M. Stewart
Keyword(s):  
Fluocinolone Acetonide ◽  
Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant

Effectiveness and tolerability of the fluocinolone acetonide implant in patients with diabetic macular edema in UAE: 12-Month results

2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212098294
Author(s):  
Ahmed Mohammed Elbarky
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Fluocinolone Acetonide ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Intravitreal Implant ◽  
Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factors

Introduction: To evaluate 12-month outcomes following fluocinolone acetonide (FAc 0.2 μg/day) implant in pseudophakic patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) that persists or recurs despite previous treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF) and dexamethasone implant (DEX) in a UAE population. Methods: A retrospective, observational, single-center, 12-month audit study, where 22 pseudophakic eyes (22 patients) with DME were treated with the FAc intravitreal implant according to licensed UAE indications. Outcome measurements at baseline and at months 1, 3, 6, and 12 included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP). Results: Post-FAc implantation, mean BCVA significantly improved at 1, 3, and 12 months (+10.4 ± 16.1, +22.8 ± 13.6, and +25.5 ± 13.0 letters, respectively; p < 0.0001), with 86% of eyes gaining ⩾15 letters at month 12. Similarly, CMT reduced significantly at month 1, and stabilized thereafter at months 3–12 (−171.5 ± 72.5 µm, −240.9 ± 74.2 µm, and −246.2 ± 93.4 µm, respectively; p < 0.0001). By month 12, 64% ( n = 14/22) of eyes had a CMT below 300 µm. Only 1 eye had an IOP ⩾ 21 mmHg at baseline and month 12. Five eyes required IOP lowering drops and 1 required IOP-lowering surgical intervention. Conclusion: In pseudophakic patients with DME FAc implant provide a substantial functional and anatomical benefits for up to 12 months.

Evaluation of a calculation model to estimate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on visual acuity in neovascular AMD

2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110523
Author(s):  
Martin Stattin ◽  
Anna-Maria Haas ◽  
Daniel Ahmed ◽  
Alexandra Graf ◽  
Katharina Krepler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Treatment Interruption ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Calculation Model ◽  
Life Outcomes ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Short Term Treatment ◽  
The Real ◽  
The Impact

Purpose A model was calculated during the first Austrian coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic lockdown to estimate the effect of a short-term treatment interruption due to healthcare restrictions on visual acuity (VA) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). The model was compared to the real-life outcomes before treatment re-started. Methods Retrospective data-collection of 142 eyes in 142 patients receiving repeated intravitreal injections with anti-VEGF at a retina unit in Vienna in a personalized pro-re-nata regimen prior to the COVID-19 associated lockdown, when treatment was deferred between March 16 and May 4, 2020. During the lockdown, the preliminary data was integrated into pre-existing formulae based on the natural course of the disease in untreated eyes in the long term. Patients were re-scheduled and treated after gradually opening operating rooms. The calculation model was compared to the effective VA change. Results The model calculated an overall VA loss of 3.5 ± 0.8 letters early treatment diabetes retinopathy study (ETDRS) ( p < 0.001 [95% CI:3.3;3.6]) on average compared to 2.5 ± 6 letters ETDRS ( p < 0.001 [95% CI:1.5;3.5]) as measured with a mean treatment delay of 61 ± 14 days after previously scheduled appointments. The total difference between the model exercise and the real-life outcomes accounted for 1 ± 5.9 letters ETDRS ( p = 0.051 [95% CI: 0.1;1.9]). Conclusion The herein presented calculation model might not be suitable to estimate the effective VA loss correctly over time, although untreated eyes and eyes under therapy show similarities after short-term treatment interruption. However, this study demonstrated the potentially negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on patients compromised by nAMD.

scholarly journals Ahmed glaucoma valve in uveitic patients with fluocinolone acetonide implant-induced glaucoma: 3-year follow-up

2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 799-804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Buraa Kubaisi ◽  
Arash Maleki ◽  
Aseef Ahmed ◽  
Neel Lamba ◽  
Haitham Sahawneh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fluocinolone Acetonide ◽  
Ahmed Glaucoma Valve ◽  
Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant

scholarly journals Real-Life ILUVIEN (Fluocinolone Acetonide) Case Study: Rapid Drying of the Macula and Improved Vision within 2 Years after Therapy Initiation

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 579-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hibba Quhill ◽  
Fahd Quhill
Keyword(s):  
Real Life ◽  
Diabetic Macular Oedema ◽  
Fluocinolone Acetonide ◽  
Intravitreal Injections ◽  
Functional Responses ◽  
Foveal Thickness ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Central Foveal Thickness ◽  
Interfering Rna

Importance: A case showing sustained structural and functional responses 2 years after a single treatment with ILUVIEN (0.2 µg/day fluocinolone acetonide, FAc) despite suboptimal responses to ranibizumab. Observations: A 68-year-old female patient with diabetic macular oedema (DME) from type 2 diabetes mellitus was first diagnosed in October 2010 and had a baseline visual acuity (VA) of 46 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters in the left eye. Central foveal thickness (CFT) was 712 microns. The patient was treated with 11 intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (5 in combination with a small-interfering RNA agent), and by March 2014, VA and CFT were largely unchanged (55 ETDRS letters and 774 microns). The patient was treated with ILUVIEN as she had a pseudophakic lens and a clearly suboptimal response to the prior therapy with ranibizumab. An implant releasing FAc at a dosage of 0.2 µg/day was administered in March 2014, and the optical coherence tomography indicated that the macula was dry after 7 days (CFT was below 300 microns). This was sustained at 6, 12, and 24 months after the treatment. VA improved by 5 letters within 7 days and by 15 letters within 14 days, and this was maintained after 24 months. Throughout the duration of this study, the intraocular pressure was ≤22 mm Hg, and no glaucoma medication was administered. Conclusions and Relevance: In real-life UK practice, this DME patient showed a suboptimal response to multiple intravitreal injections of ranibizumab. When subsequently treated with a single injection of ILUVIEN, there were large and rapid improvements in VA and CFT that were maintained for the following 2 years.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document