scholarly journals Effectiveness of routine population‐wide orthoptic preschool vision screening tests at age 6–24 months in the Netherlands

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frea Sloot ◽  
Marieke Alberdina Johanna Telleman ◽  
Janine Benjamins ◽  
Aya Sami ◽  
Jacob Pieter Hoogendam ◽  
...  
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1959 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 274-274
Author(s):  
LAWRENCE J. LAWSON

This book reports a statistical study made of 1,000 Orinda, California, children who were given annual school visual screening tests of various types for 3 consecutive years. Throughout the report a plea is made for agreement between ophthalmologists and optometrists via an interprofessional committee to establish screening standards that will identify children requiring visual attention. It is repeatedly emphasized that performance on visual acuity alone does not adequately refer all those needing care, but a more comprehensive analysis is necessary. The study attemps to determine the cut-off points on selected criteria which would separate the correct referrals from the unnecessary ones as accurately as possible.


2009 ◽  
Vol 247 (11) ◽  
pp. 1441-1454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Schmucker ◽  
Robert Grosselfinger ◽  
Rob Riemsma ◽  
Gerd Antes ◽  
Stefan Lange ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 250-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liora Ore ◽  
Ada Tamir ◽  
Nili Stein ◽  
Michal Cohen-Dar

2018 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid T. Metsing ◽  
Wanda Jacobs ◽  
Rekha Hansraj

Background: What constitutes an appropriate vision screening protocol is controversial, because the tests or methods are expected to be cost-effective, expedient and easy but efficient in detecting visual anomalies among children.Aim: This review intends to compare the different vision screening tests for children and methods in the interest of identifying the most effective screening method from the standpoint of validity, public acceptance, expediency and cost.Method: The literature search was performed for this review using the Medline, Science Direct and EBSCOhost databases. The search terms used were vision screening methods or tests, children’s vision screenings, computer software programs and vision screening instruments. The inclusion criteria for the articles reviewed were all types of articles related to vision screening methods. The exclusion criteria were all articles for which full text was not available and those not available in English. Eighty articles were analysed, of which 33 were found to have complied with the inclusion criteria and were selected. From the first round of articles retrieved, additional references were identified by a manual search among the cited references.Results: Evidence from the literature reviewed demonstrated that the conventional vision screening method (isolated and combination tests) is the method commonly used to detect a range of relevant visual anomalies among the schoolgoing age group (≥ 6 years) and drew attention to the need for training of vision screening personnel. However, in addition to the conventional method, other vision screening methods include instruments as an adjunct for screening preschoolers and those difficult to screen (≤ 6 years).Conclusion: Inconsistencies in what constitutes an appropriate vision screening method still exist, especially with the booming market of using computer software programs, which still needs to be validated.


2019 ◽  
Vol 236 (04) ◽  
pp. 429-433
Author(s):  
Leila Eppenberger ◽  
Petra Züst ◽  
Andrea Kunz ◽  
Caroline Scheitlin ◽  
Jan Heckmann ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pediatric vision screening has been shown to reduce the prevalence of amblyopia. To assess the current local situation in the Canton of St. Gallen, a survey study was performed. Methods A standardized questionnaire was sent to 191 general practitioners and school doctors to obtain information on the currently applied vision screening protocols for children. The questionnaire included 17 questions with multiple answers possible. Results Sixty-seven participants (35%) answered the survey. Overall, 61 (91%) of the repliers confirmed that some sort of vision screening exists. According to 45 (67%) repliers, a mandatory examination exists. As to the question about the person performing the examination, multiple answers were given; 39 (44%) answered that the secretary or the medical practical assistant performs the vision tests, 15 (17%) indicated the school doctor, and 25 (28%) indicated the general practitioner or the pediatrician. Most screening tests are performed in a general practitionerʼs practice (32; 40%), some are done in the kindergartens (17; 21%), and others are done in a pediatricianʼs practice (17; 21%). The majority of children are tested at the age of 5 – 6 years (58, 87%). Sixty-one (91%) of the repliers indicated that at least the childrenʼs visual acuity is measured. Acuity is assessed with different methods, mainly, with pictures (20; 30%), numbers (23; 34%), and Snellen optotypes (33; 49%). Conclusions There are no consistent regulations regarding vision screening in the Canton of St. Gallen. Actually, rather different screening scenarios exist. Tests are performed by a variety of people in different locations with diverse testing procedures. A standardization of the applied screening procedures at cantonal and national levels seems reasonable.


2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 166-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hadi OstadiMoghaddam ◽  
Akbar Fotouhi ◽  
Hassan Hashemi ◽  
AbbasAli Yekta ◽  
Javad Heravian ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document