Grief, trauma and mistaken identity: Ethically deceiving people living with dementia in complex cases

Bioethics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matilda Carter
2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 458-458
Author(s):  
Erik P. Castle ◽  
Michael E. Woods ◽  
Raju Thomas ◽  
Rodney Davis

1991 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 1017-1017
Author(s):  
William Gardner
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Jean-Philippe Bernardy ◽  
Stergios Chatzikyriakidis ◽  
Aleksandre Maskharashvili

AbstractIn this paper, we propose a framework capable of dealing with anaphora and ellipsis which is both general and algorithmic. This generality is ensured by the compination of two general ideas. First, we use a dynamic semantics which reperent effects using a monad structure. Second we treat scopes flexibly, extending them as needed. We additionally implement this framework as an algorithm which translates abstract syntax to logical formulas. We argue that this framework can provide a unified account of a large number of anaphoric phenomena. Specifically, we show its effectiveness in dealing with pronominal and VP-anaphora, strict and lazy pronouns, lazy identity, bound variable anaphora, e-type pronouns, and cataphora. This means that in particular we can handle complex cases like Bach–Peters sentences, which require an account dealing simultaneously with several phenomena. We use Haskell as a meta-language to present the theory, which also consitutes an implementation of all the phenomena discussed in the paper. To demonstrate coverage, we propose a test suite that can be used to evaluate computational approaches to anaphora.


Author(s):  
Danuta Ciesielska ◽  
Krzysztof Ciesielski
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Advait Pandya ◽  
Krishna Kotecha ◽  
Edward Li ◽  
Anthony J. Gill ◽  
Jaswinder S. Samra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Antichthon ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 54-79
Author(s):  
Ronald T. Ridley

AbstractSince the late sixteenth century parts of the ‘imperial frieze’ of the Ara Pacis have been known. The most striking figure in the background of the southern frieze is that long thought to be a portrait of Maecenas, the Etruscan prince and literary patron of the Augustan era. This article attempts three things: to discover 1.Where and how this identification originated,2.What evidence there now is for that identification, and3.What alternative identifications can be offered.The bibliography is substantial, the trail is complicated and highly paradoxical, and fantasy has often played a large role. The ‘evidence’ in play for centuries has sometimes evaporated into thin air. The identities proposed are, in fact, numerous. Not of least interest is the hidden or mistaken identity, in turn, of crucial modern scholars. A method is proposed at last for evaluating the identifications of this background portrait, including obvious comparison with other background figures. This analysis emphasizes how much is still not known about the most famous piece of Augustan art. An attempt is nevertheless made in the last analysis, to support what can be offered, in the light of current understanding, as the most plausible identification.


Author(s):  
Cristian Bravo-Lillo ◽  
Lorrie Cranor ◽  
Julie Downs ◽  
Saranga Komanduri ◽  
Stuart Schechter ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document