scholarly journals Cardiac biomarkers and health‐related quality of life in patients with light chain ( AL ) amyloidosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 185 (5) ◽  
pp. 998-1001
Author(s):  
Kristen L. McCausland ◽  
Tiffany P. Quock ◽  
Avery A. Rizio ◽  
Martha S. Bayliss ◽  
Michelle K. White ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. S114
Author(s):  
Kristen McCausland ◽  
Spencer D. Guthrie ◽  
Tiffany Quock ◽  
Miyo Yokota ◽  
Martha Bayliss ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5965-5965
Author(s):  
Michelle K. White ◽  
Martha Bayliss ◽  
Kristen McCausland ◽  
Colin Oliver ◽  
Spencer D. Guthrie

Abstract Introduction Light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare disease in which misfolded light chains are deposited in tissues, which may lead to organ failure, disability, and death. We present changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between an initial and a six-month follow-up survey from an observational, community-based study of patients with AL amyloidosis. Methods We partnered with patient advocacy groups to recruit a diverse sample of AL amyloidosis patients (n = 341 initial, n=226 at six-months; 66%) to participate in a non-interventional, community-based study. Online surveys were used to assess demographics, disease and treatment characteristics, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). HRQoL measures included the patient global assessment of change (PGAC), a five-level ordinal item that asks patients to rate how much their condition has improved or worsened since their initial survey, and the SF-36v2® Health Survey (SF-36v2). The SF-36v2 measures HRQoL across eight scales and two component summary scores of functional health and well-being. Higher scores represent better functioning. Paired t-tests were used to examine significant changes within the full sample and key subgroups. ANCOVA methods, controlling for baseline scores, were conducted to compare changes for the following groups: 1) recently treated patients who received treatment during the past year vs. those whose most recent treatment was more than one year ago; and 2) patients who reported improvement vs. worsening over the six-month period on the PGAC. Analysis of variance was used to compare the SF-36v2 scores from AL amyloidosis patients to a sample representing a general population (GP) norm. The GP data were adjusted to the age and gender distribution of the patient sample using separate ordinary least-squares regression models, with each SF-36 scale or summary score as a dependent variable. Results At six-month follow-up, patients were 56.3% female, 91.6% white, and an average of 61.3 years of age. Patients' average time since diagnosis was 5 years, and almost half had three or more organs affected by AL amyloidosis (48.7%). The most reported symptoms were fatigue (81.9%), shortness of breath (52.7%), and numbness of arms and legs (46.2%). Over a quarter of patients had received ≥ 5 treatment series (26.1%), and about half were currently or had recently received treatment (49.1%), with 44.7% of patients currently in complete hematologic response. Nearly a third (31.3%) of patients reported that their AL amyloidosis had somewhat or very much improved since the initial survey and 21.0% described their condition as somewhat or very much worse. No significant changes in SF-36v2 scores were observed in the full sample after adjusting for multiple comparisons. Given the stability of SF-36v2 scores over time, significant deficits existed at both baseline and follow-up relative to a GP (Figure 1). For most scales, the SF-36v2 scores changed positively among patients who described their condition as improved and declined among those whose condition reportedly worsened (Figure 2). Mean change differed significantly by improvement status for Physical Functioning, Role Physical, General Health, and Vitality scales, as well as the Physical Component Score (P<0.05 for all). Mean changes in the General Health scale of the SF-36v2 differed significantly by time since last treatment (P=0.003), where the scores declined among recently treated patients and improved among those treated more than a year ago (-0.9 vs. 1.2, respectively). Conclusions This study describes patients with AL amyloidosis in a community-based online study and provides insight into changes in HRQoL over a six-month period. Since this is a non-interventional study with almost half of patients in remission, we examined change in HRQoL with three approaches (full sample, by time since last treatment, and by patients' self-assessment of their condition). Although there was little significant change in HRQoL in the six-month period, positive changes were observed among patients who described their condition as improved. Furthermore, significant deficits in HRQoL persisted over time. It may be that six months is not a long enough period to observe change, particularly in a sample where the majority of patients are not newly diagnosed. Our study will continue to follow these patients through 24 months post-study entry which may provide a broader view. Disclosures White: Prothena Biosciences Inc: Research Funding. Bayliss:Prothena Biosciences Inc: Research Funding. McCausland:Prothena Biosciences Inc: Research Funding. Oliver:Prothena Biosciences, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Guthrie:Prothena: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Leadership.


2017 ◽  
Vol 179 (3) ◽  
pp. 461-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaishali Sanchorawala ◽  
Kristen L. McCausland ◽  
Michelle K. White ◽  
Martha S. Bayliss ◽  
Spencer D. Guthrie ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4525-4525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle K. White ◽  
Martha Bayliss ◽  
Muriel Finkel ◽  
Isabelle Lousada ◽  
Spencer Guthrie

Abstract Introduction and Objective: AL amyloidosis (AL) is a rare, complex, and progressive disease in which an abnormal protein, amyloid, misfolds and deposits in organs. AL can affect one or many organs, such as the heart, kidneys, liver, nervous system, and digestive tract, leading to organ dysfunction and death. AL symptoms and treatments are known to impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL), but little research has been conducted to establish which HRQoL concepts are relevant for AL patients before and during treatment. The objective of this study was to identify the most important HRQoL concepts to measure in clinical trials of AL patients through in-depth interviews with physicians and patients. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted from March to May 2015 through in-depth, 1-hour telephone interviews using a concept elicitation method and semistructured interview guides. In phase 1, interviews were conducted with three hematologists and one nephrologist on (a) journey to diagnosis, including how HRQoL is evaluated in everyday practice, and (b) HRQoL concepts that impact how AL patients feel and function. In phase 2, interviews were conducted with 10 AL patients who varied in terms of organ involvement, years since diagnosis, and response to treatment. Patients provided input on journey to diagnosis and impact of AL and treatment on their HRQoL. All interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, coded, and analyzed using NVivo software and a grounded theory approach. Physician interviews were coded and analyzed by one researcher. Patient interviews were coded and analyzed by four researchers, with dual coding and review meetings to ensure agreement between coders. Transcripts were divided into four groups (interviews 1-3, 4-6, 7-9, 10) and were coded one group at a time to demonstrate saturation (saturation reflects the point at which no new relevant information emerges and interviewing can stop). Results/Physician Interviews: Physicians reported an average time to diagnosis of at least 10 months, during which patients consulted three or four different physician specialists to reach a diagnosis. Respondents called AL "a great masquerader" because AL presents in different organs and because many AL symptoms are common to other diseases. Physicians did not use any standardized assessments for HRQoL with AL patients; instead, they asked generally about fatigue, sleep, pain, and impact on work. They agreed to the usefulness of a standard HRQoL assessment but worried about the time it would require. They recommended patients complete HRQoL assessment every 3 months, using a recall period of "past month." After complete hematologic response, assessment could slow to every 6 months. Physicians agreed the most important HRQoL concepts were physical functioning, vitality/fatigue, pain, ability to work and perform other roles, general health, and sleep. They also noted an impact on mental health, such as depression and anxiety. Results/Patient Interviews: Patients reported a variety of experiences on their journey to diagnosis in terms of time to diagnosis, number and types of doctors seen, and number of tests/examinations. The average time to diagnosis was 2 years and ranged from 3 months to 4 years, during which they consulted, on average, three different physician specialists to reach a diagnosis. The type of physician specialist consulted depended on the organ involved. Patients reported a broad range of serious HRQoL impacts from AL, spanning physical disability to emotional distress. Specifically, impairments were noted in physical function and mobility, energy level, ability to work, participation in leisure activities, role in family, social relationships, mental health, sleep, cognitive function, ability to exercise, and ability to perform activities of daily living. The level of impairment was severe in many areas. Saturation analysis confirmed no new information emerged in the later interviews. Conclusions: Physicians and patients reported significant challenges in diagnosing AL and severe impairments across a broad range of HRQoL concepts. Because developers of new drugs are expected to provide direct evidence of the treatment benefit experienced by patients, these concepts should be measured in clinical trials with AL patients to demonstrate meaningful treatment benefits to patients. Disclosures White: Prothena Biosciences Inc: Consultancy. Bayliss:Prothena Biosciences Inc: Consultancy. Guthrie:Prothena Biosciences Inc: Employment, Other: Stock.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document