scholarly journals Urban wild meat consumption and trade in central Amazonia

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 438-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hani R. El Bizri ◽  
Thaís Q. Morcatty ◽  
João Valsecchi ◽  
Pedro Mayor ◽  
Jéssica E. S. Ribeiro ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 183
Author(s):  
Hani R. El Bizri ◽  
Thaís Q. Morcatty ◽  
José C. Ferreira ◽  
Pedro Mayor ◽  
Carlos F. A. Vasconcelos Neto ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
KIM E. REUTER ◽  
HALEY RANDELL ◽  
ABIGAIL R. WILLS ◽  
BRENT J. SEWALL

SUMMARYThe role of wild meat for subsistence or as a luxury good is debated. We investigated the role of wild meat in food security in Madagascar, where consumption is poorly understood in urban areas and at regional scales. Using semi-structured interviews (n = 1339 heads-of-households, 21 towns), we aimed to: (1) quantify the amount and purpose of, (2) understand the drivers of, and (3) examine changes in wild meat consumption. Few respondents preferred wild meat (8 ± 3%) but most had eaten it at least once in their lifetime (78 ± 7%). Consumption occurred across ethnic groups, in urban and rural settings. More food insecure areas reported higher rates of wild meat consumption in the 6–8 months prior to interviews. Consumption was best explained by individual preferences and taboos. Less than 1% of respondents had increased consumption during their lifetimes. Wild meat prices showed no change from 2005–2013. Most consumption involved wild pigs and smaller-sized animals, though they were consumed less in the years following the 2009 coup. These data illustrate the differences between urban and rural communities, the occasions in which wild meat is used a source of food security, and provide evidence that some taxa are not hunted sustainably in Madagascar.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e12391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willandia A. Chaves ◽  
Denis R. Valle ◽  
Martha C. Monroe ◽  
David S. Wilkie ◽  
Kathryn E. Sieving ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Carvalho ◽  
Francisco Rego ◽  
Jorge M. Palmeirim ◽  
John E. Fa

Author(s):  
Wellinson Maximin de Souza Severino ◽  
Erick Silva dos Santos ◽  
Helenilza Ferreira Albuquerque-Cunha

This study assessed the direct impacts of Cachoeira Caldeirão Hydropower Plant (before and during its construction) on the eating habits (fish and wild meat consumption) of the residents in Porto Grande City, Amapá State, Brazil. The study was conducted in 2015, based on a questionnaire for data collection (Sample size = 53) and on comparative analysis for significance (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.05) and correlation (Pearson’s test) assessment. Results suggested significant changes in families’ eating habits. The Wilcoxon test detected three significant variables (p < 0.05): family income, number of species (fish and wild meat consumption) and rate of wild meat consumption per family. Both the Wilcoxon and the Pearson’s correlation tests confirmed two variables (p < 0.05 and r > 0.7): family income versus wild meat consumption before (p value = 0.045; r = - 0.75) and family income versus fish consumption during (p value = 0.0029; r = - 0.83) hydropower plant construction. It can be inferred that the decrease in family fish consumption may be related to changes in the families' eating habits. Changes in diet may have led families to a growing consumption of industrialized and/or ultra-processed foods, very common in geographically isolated Amazon riverside regions with limited access to electricity. Furthermore, families were forced to adapt to a new reality due to environmental changes in their territories.


Author(s):  
Lísley Pereira Lemos ◽  
Luiz Francisco Loureiro ◽  
Thais Queiroz Morcatty ◽  
Julia E. Fa ◽  
Carlos Frederico Alves de Vasconcelos Neto ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 212 ◽  
pp. 240-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willandia A. Chaves ◽  
David S. Wilkie ◽  
Martha C. Monroe ◽  
Kathryn E. Sieving

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document