scholarly journals Effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy on glycaemic control and psychological outcomes in adults with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 328-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Uchendu ◽  
H. Blake
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Glycaemic Control ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural

scholarly journals Cognitive behavioural therapy monotherapy for insomnia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. 101828
Author(s):  
Yuan-Yuan Wang ◽  
Yuan Yang ◽  
Wen-Wang Rao ◽  
Shu-Fang Zhang ◽  
Liang-Nan Zeng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural

scholarly journals The impact of interventions for youth experiencing homelessness on housing, mental health, substance use, and family cohesion: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Zhuo Wang ◽  
Sebastian Mott ◽  
Olivia Magwood ◽  
Christine Mathew ◽  
Andrew Mclellan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Substance Use ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Housing Stability ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Family Based

Abstract Background Youth often experience unique pathways into homelessness, such as family conflict, child abuse and neglect. Most research has focused on adult homeless populations, yet youth have specific needs that require adapted interventions. This review aims to synthesize evidence on interventions for youth and assess their impacts on health, social, and equity outcomes. Methods We systematically searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and other databases from inception until February 9, 2018 for systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials on youth interventions conducted in high income countries. We screened title and abstract and full text for inclusion, and data extraction were completed in duplicate, following the PRISMA-E (equity) review approach. Results Our search identified 11,936 records. Four systematic reviews and 18 articles on randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Many studies reported on interventions including individual and family therapies, skill-building, case management, and structural interventions. Cognitive behavioural therapy led to improvements in depression and substance use, and studies of three family-based therapies reported decreases in substance use. Housing first, a structural intervention, led to improvements in housing stability. Many interventions showed inconsistent results compared to services as usual or other interventions, but often led to improvements over time in both the intervention and comparison group. The equity analysis showed that equity variables were inconsistently measured, but there was data to suggest differential outcomes based upon gender and ethnicity. Conclusions This review identified a variety of interventions for youth experiencing homelessness. Promising interventions include cognitive behavioural therapy for addressing depression, family-based therapy for substance use outcomes, and housing programs for housing stability. Youth pathways are often unique and thus prevention and treatment may benefit from a tailored and flexible approach.

scholarly journals A juxtaposition of safety outcomes between various doses of sodium-glucose co-transporter inhibitors, in insulin-treated type-1 diabetes mellitus patients: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-172
Author(s):  
Sumanta Saha
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled

  Background: Several clinical trials have tested the safety profile of sodium-glucose co-transport inhibitors’ (SGLTis) in adult type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients. However, no systematic review has yet compared its variation between large and low dose SGLTis. Henceforth, a review protocol is proposed here to review it. Methods: Different electronic databases will be searched for randomized-controlled trials (published in the English language) studying the above objective, irrespective of their publication date. After selecting the eligible trials, their data on the study design, population characteristics, compared interventions, and outcomes of interest will be extracted. Then, utilizing the Cochrane tool, each trial's risk of selection bias, detection bias, performance bias, attrition bias, reporting bias, and other bias will be judged. Next, depending on clinical heterogeneity among the trials, a random-effect or fixed-effect model meta-analysis will be used to compare the respective outcomes. Via the Chi2 and I2 statistics, the statistical inconsistency among the trials will be estimated. When this is substantial, subgroup analysis will follow. Publication bias will be evaluated by funnel plots and Egger’s test. A sensitivity analysis will be done to check different assumptions. If a quantitative juxtaposition is not possible, a narrative reporting will ensue. Conclusion: The proposed study will perform a dose-wise juxtaposition of the safety profile of SGLTis in insulin-treated T1DM patients. Registration: Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (Registration no. CRD42019146578)    

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document