Manchester Intermittent versus Daily Diet App Study ( MIDDAS ): A pilot randomized controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah McDiarmid ◽  
Michelle Harvie ◽  
Rhona Johnson ◽  
Avni Vyas ◽  
Azza Aglan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Daily Diet ◽  
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

scholarly journals Web-Based Weight Loss Intervention for Men With Type 2 Diabetes: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Diabetes ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. e14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Haste ◽  
Ashley J Adamson ◽  
Elaine McColl ◽  
Vera Araujo-Soares ◽  
Ruth Bell
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Weight Loss Intervention ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

scholarly journals A yoga intervention for type 2 diabetes risk reduction: a pilot randomized controlled trial

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly A McDermott ◽  
Mohan Raghavendra Rao ◽  
Raghuram Nagarathna ◽  
Elizabeth J Murphy ◽  
Adam Burke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Risk Reduction ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Diabetes Risk ◽  
Yoga Intervention ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

scholarly journals Pilot randomized controlled trial of a mindfulness-based group intervention in adolescent girls at risk for type 2 diabetes with depressive symptoms

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 66-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren B. Shomaker ◽  
Stephanie Bruggink ◽  
Bernadette Pivarunas ◽  
Amanda Skoranski ◽  
Jillian Foss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Adolescent Girls ◽  
Group Intervention ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

scholarly journals Feasibility of Pairing Behavioral Activation With Exercise for Women With Type 2 Diabetes and Depression: The Get It Study Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin L. Schneider ◽  
Emily Panza ◽  
Barbara Handschin ◽  
Yunsheng Ma ◽  
Andrew M. Busch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Behavioral Activation ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

scholarly journals Intermittent Versus Continuous Low-Energy Diet in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

10.2196/21116 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e21116
Author(s):  
Sarah McDiarmid ◽  
Michelle Harvie ◽  
Rhona Johnson ◽  
Avni Vyas ◽  
Azza Aglan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Mediterranean Diet ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Low Energy ◽  
Patient Choice ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Background Intensive face-to-face weight loss programs using continuous low-energy diets (CLEDs) providing approximately 800 kcal per day (3347 kJ per day) can produce significant weight loss and remission from type 2 diabetes (T2D). Intermittent low-energy diets (ILEDs) and remotely delivered programs could be viable alternatives that may support patient choice and adherence. Objective This paper describes the protocol of a pilot randomized controlled trial to test the feasibility and potential efficacy of remotely supported isocaloric ILED and CLED programs among patients with overweight and obesity and T2D. Methods A total of 79 participants were recruited from primary care, two National Health Service hospital trusts, and a voluntary T2D research register in the United Kingdom. The participants were randomized to a remotely delivered ILED (n=39) or CLED (n=40). The active weight loss phase of CLED involved 8 weeks of Optifast 820 kcal/3430 kJ formula diet, followed by 4 weeks of food reintroduction. The active weight loss phase of ILED (n=39) comprised 2 days of Optifast 820 kcal/3430 kJ diet and 5 days of a portion-controlled Mediterranean diet for 28 weeks. Both groups were asked to complete 56 Optifast 820 kcal/3430 kJ days during their active weight loss phase with an equivalent energy deficit. The diets were isocaloric for the remainder of the 12 months. CLED participants were asked to follow a portion-controlled Mediterranean diet 7 days per week. ILED followed 1-2 days per week of a food-based 820 kcal/3430 kJ diet and a portion-controlled Mediterranean diet for 5-6 days per week. Participants received high-frequency (weekly, fortnightly, or monthly depending on the stage of the trial) multidisciplinary remote support from a dietitian, nurse, exercise specialist, and psychologist via telephone or the Oviva smartphone app. The primary outcomes of the study were uptake, weight loss, and changes in glycated hemoglobin at 12 months. An outcome assessment of trial retention was retrospectively added. Secondary outcomes included an assessment of adherence and adverse events. A qualitative evaluation was undertaken via interviews with participants and health care professionals who delivered the intervention. Results A total of 79 overweight or obese participants aged 18-75 years and diagnosed with T2D in the last 8 years were recruited to the Manchester Intermittent and Daily Diet Diabetes App Study (MIDDAS). Recruitment began in February 2018, and data collection was completed in February 2020. Data analysis began in June 2020, and the first results are expected to be submitted for publication in 2021. Conclusions The outcomes of the MIDDAS study will inform the feasibility of remotely delivered ILED and CLED programs in clinical practice and the requirement for a larger-scale randomized controlled trial. Trial Registration International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 15394285; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15394285 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/21116

scholarly journals Electrically assisted cycling for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica E. Bourne ◽  
Angie Page ◽  
Sam Leary ◽  
Robert C. Andrews ◽  
Clare England ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Electrically Assisted ◽  
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract Background The global incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing. Given the many complications associated with T2DM, effective management of the disease is crucial. Physical activity is considered to be a key component of T2DM management. However, people with T2DM are generally less physically active than individuals without T2DM and adherence to physical activity is often poor following completion of lifestyle interventions. As such, developing interventions that foster sustainable physical activity is of high priority. Electrically assisted bicycles (e-bikes) have been highlighted as a potential strategy for promoting physical activity in this population. E-bikes provide electrical assistance to the rider only when pedalling and could overcome commonly reported barriers to regular cycling. This paper describes the protocol of the PEDAL-2 pilot randomized controlled trial, an e-cycling intervention aimed at increasing physical activity in individuals with T2DM. Methods A parallel-group two-arm randomized waitlist-controlled pilot trial will be conducted. Forty individuals with T2DM will be randomly assigned, in a 1:1 allocation ratio, to an e-cycling intervention or waitlist control. Recruitment and screening will close once 20 participants have been randomized to each study arm. The intervention will involve e-bike training with a certified cycle instructor and provision of an e-bike for 12 weeks. Data will be collected at baseline, during the intervention and immediately post-intervention using both quantitative and qualitative methods. In this trial, the primary interests are determination of effective recruitment strategies, recruitment and consent rates, adherence and retention and delivery and receipt of the intervention. The potential impact of the intervention on a range of clinical, physiological and behaviour outcomes will be assessed to examine intervention promise. Data analyses will be descriptive. Discussion This paper describes the protocol for the PEDAL-2 pilot randomized controlled trial. Results from this trial will provide information on trial feasibility and identify the promise of e-cycling as a strategy to positively impact the health and behaviour of individuals with T2DM. If appropriate, this information can be used to design and deliver a fully powered definitive trial. Trial registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN67421464. Registered 03/01/2019.

scholarly journals Intermittent Versus Continuous Low-Energy Diet in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah McDiarmid ◽  
Michelle Harvie ◽  
Rhona Johnson ◽  
Avni Vyas ◽  
Azza Aglan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Mediterranean Diet ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Low Energy ◽  
Patient Choice ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND Intensive face-to-face weight loss programs using continuous low-energy diets (CLEDs) providing approximately 800 kcal per day (3347 kJ per day) can produce significant weight loss and remission from type 2 diabetes (T2D). Intermittent low-energy diets (ILEDs) and remotely delivered programs could be viable alternatives that may support patient choice and adherence. OBJECTIVE This paper describes the protocol of a pilot randomized controlled trial to test the feasibility and potential efficacy of remotely supported isocaloric ILED and CLED programs among patients with overweight and obesity and T2D. METHODS A total of 79 participants were recruited from primary care, two National Health Service hospital trusts, and a voluntary T2D research register in the United Kingdom. The participants were randomized to a remotely delivered ILED (n=39) or CLED (n=40). The active weight loss phase of CLED involved 8 weeks of Optifast 820 kcal/3430 kJ formula diet, followed by 4 weeks of food reintroduction. The active weight loss phase of ILED (n=39) comprised 2 days of Optifast 820 kcal/3430 kJ diet and 5 days of a portion-controlled Mediterranean diet for 28 weeks. Both groups were asked to complete 56 Optifast 820 kcal/3430 kJ days during their active weight loss phase with an equivalent energy deficit. The diets were isocaloric for the remainder of the 12 months. CLED participants were asked to follow a portion-controlled Mediterranean diet 7 days per week. ILED followed 1-2 days per week of a food-based 820 kcal/3430 kJ diet and a portion-controlled Mediterranean diet for 5-6 days per week. Participants received high-frequency (weekly, fortnightly, or monthly depending on the stage of the trial) multidisciplinary remote support from a dietitian, nurse, exercise specialist, and psychologist via telephone or the Oviva smartphone app. The primary outcomes of the study were uptake, weight loss, and changes in glycated hemoglobin at 12 months. An outcome assessment of trial retention was retrospectively added. Secondary outcomes included an assessment of adherence and adverse events. A qualitative evaluation was undertaken via interviews with participants and health care professionals who delivered the intervention. RESULTS A total of 79 overweight or obese participants aged 18-75 years and diagnosed with T2D in the last 8 years were recruited to the Manchester Intermittent and Daily Diet Diabetes App Study (MIDDAS). Recruitment began in February 2018, and data collection was completed in February 2020. Data analysis began in June 2020, and the first results are expected to be submitted for publication in 2021. CONCLUSIONS The outcomes of the MIDDAS study will inform the feasibility of remotely delivered ILED and CLED programs in clinical practice and the requirement for a larger-scale randomized controlled trial. CLINICALTRIAL International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 15394285; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15394285 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT DERR1-10.2196/21116

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document