Differential responses of circadianPer2expression rhythms in discrete brain areas to daily injection of methamphetamine and restricted feeding in rats

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akiyo Natsubori ◽  
Ken-ichi Honma ◽  
Sato Honma
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeltje E. M. van Haren ◽  
Robert A. Renes ◽  
Henk Aarts ◽  
Matthijs Vink
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Landgrebe ◽  
K Rosengarth ◽  
A Koch ◽  
T Kleinjung ◽  
A May ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (01) ◽  
pp. E2-E89
Author(s):  
A Kremer ◽  
T Buchwald ◽  
M Vetter ◽  
A Dörfler ◽  
C Forster

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1053-P
Author(s):  
JORDAN SHERWOOD ◽  
COURTNEY A. BALLIRO ◽  
FIRAS EL-KHATIB ◽  
LAYA EKHLASPOUR ◽  
LIANA HSU ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Hesling

The modalities of communication are the sum of the expression dimension (linguistics) and the expressivity dimension (prosody), both being equally important in language communication. The expressivity dimension which comes first in the act of speech, is the basis on which phonemes, syllables, words, grammar and morphosyntax, i.e., the expression dimension of speech is superimposed. We will review evidence (1) revealing the importance of prosody in language acquisition and (2) showing that prosody triggers the involvement of specific brain areas dedicated to sentences and word-list processing. To support the first point, we will not only rely on experimental psychology studies conducted in newborns and young children but also on neuroimaging studies that have helped to validate these behavioral experiments. Then, neuroimaging data on adults will allow for concluding that the expressivity dimension of speech modulates both the right hemisphere prosodic areas and the left hemisphere network in charge of the expression dimension


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document