Does firm‐level political risk influence corporate social responsibility (CSR)? Evidence from earnings conference calls

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pattanaporn Chatjuthamard ◽  
Sirimon Treepongkaruna ◽  
Pornsit Jiraporn ◽  
Napatsorn Jiraporn
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Political Risk ◽  
Conference Calls ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Corporate Social

Does firm-level political risk influence corporate social responsibility (CSR)? Evidence from earnings conference calls

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pattanaporn Chatjuthamard ◽  
Sirimon Treepongkaruna ◽  
Pornsit Jiraporn ◽  
Napatsorn (Pom) Jiraporn
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Political Risk ◽  
Conference Calls ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Corporate Social

The effect of political risk on shareholder value and the mitigating role of corporate social responsibility (CSR)

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. 1217-1230
Author(s):  
Pattanaporn Chatjuthamard ◽  
Pornsit Jiraporn ◽  
Pattarake Sarajoti ◽  
Manohar Singh
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Risk Mitigation ◽  
Shareholder Value ◽  
Political Risk ◽  
Shareholder Wealth ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Exogenous Shock ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Corporate Social

PurposeThe study investigates the effect of political risk on shareholder value, using an event study and a novel measure of firm-level political risk recently developed by Hassan et al. (2017). In addition, the authors explore how corporate social responsibility (CSR) influences the effect of political risk on shareholder wealth.Design/methodology/approachThe authors exploit the guilty plea of Jack Abramoff, a well-known lobbyist, on January 3, 2006, as an exogenous shock that made lobbying less effective and less useful in the future, depriving firms of an important tool to reduce political exposure.FindingsThe results show that the market reactions are significantly more negative for firms with more political exposure. Additional analysis corroborates the results, including propensity score matching, instrumental-variable analysis and Oster's (2019) method for testing coefficient stability. Finally, the authors note that the adverse effect of political risk on shareholder value is substantially mitigated for firms with strong social responsibility, consistent with the risk mitigation hypothesis.Originality/valueThis study is the first to explore the effect of political risk on shareholder value using a novel measure. Furthermore, it is also the first to show that CSR alleviates the cost of political risk to shareholders.

Impact of corporate social responsibility intensity on firm-specific risk and innovation: evidence from Japan

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Megumi Suto ◽  
Hitoshi Takehara
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Research And Development ◽  
Manufacturing Industry ◽  
Corporate Sustainability ◽  
Idiosyncratic Risk ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Specific Risk ◽  
Corporate Social

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate investors’ perception of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its risk-mitigating effects on firm-level innovation in Japan from 2006 to 2017. The authors examine the influence of CSR intensity on firm-specific risks, focusing on the risk-moderating effect of CSR on innovation. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a simple slope analysis and panel data regressions with input and output innovation measures and idiosyncratic risk based on an asset-pricing model. Findings The results demonstrate that CSR intensity not only reduces firm-specific risk directly but also indirectly by negatively moderating the relationship between firm-level innovation and idiosyncratic risk. Research limitations/implications Signaling trust to capital markets, CSR engagements in the manufacturing industry are clearly important for innovative firms with active research and development undertakings. Practical implications Corporate managers should further expand their efforts to make non-financial disclosures available, considering the interactions between CSR intensity and research and development financial risk. Originality/value In the context of Japanese firms, this study demonstrates the interaction between CSR practices and innovation activities from the perspective of long-term management of corporate sustainability.

HIGH CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY BUT LOW CORPORATE MATERNITY RESPONSIBILITY: KOREAN EVIDENCE

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
HANNA JUNG ◽  
JOONMO CHO
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Issues ◽  
Parental Leave ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Governance Indicators ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Korean Firm

This study analyzes the association between corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities and maternity protection using Korean firm-level data. The result shows that companies with good CSR evaluation is negatively related to reinstatement rate after parental leave. It was also revealed that industries with low relevance to female workers or consumer issues and firms with good corporate governance indicators is negatively related to maternity protection. Firms are attracted to external social issues, rather than internal labor standards, such as parental leave. This study examined various causes that lead to these results.

scholarly journals Corruption, Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Constraints: International Firm-level Evidence

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerstin Lopatta ◽  
Reemda Jaeschke ◽  
Magdalena Tchikov ◽  
Sumit Lodhia
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Financial Constraints ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
International Firm ◽  
Corporate Social

Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Finance

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Liang ◽  
Luc Renneboog
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Corporate Management ◽  
Socially Responsible ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Investment Projects ◽  
Portfolio Decisions ◽  
Rating Agencies ◽  
Proxy Voting ◽  
Corporate Social

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) refers to the incorporation of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations into corporate management, financial decision-making, and investors’ portfolio decisions. Socially responsible firms are expected to internalize the externalities they create (e.g., pollution) and be accountable to shareholders and other stakeholders (employees, customers, suppliers, local communities, etc.). Rating agencies have developed firm-level measures of ESG performance that are widely used in the literature. However, these ratings show inconsistencies that result from the rating agencies’ preferences, weights of the constituting factors, and rating methodology. CSR also deals with sustainable, responsible, and impact investing. The return implications of investing in the stocks of socially responsible firms include the search for an EGS factor and the performance of SRI funds. SRI funds apply negative screening (exclusion of “sin” industries), positive screening, and activism through engagement or proxy voting. In this context, one wonders whether responsible investors are willing to trade off financial returns with a “moral” dividend (the return given up in exchange for an increase in utility driven by the knowledge that an investment is ethical). Related to the analysis of externalities and the ethical dimension of corporate decisions is the literature on green financing (the financing of environmentally friendly investment projects by means of green bonds) and on how to foster economic decarbonization as climate change affects financial markets and investor behavior.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document