Development and validation of a score to assess risk of medication errors detected during medication reconciliation process at admission in internal medicine unit: SCOREM study

Author(s):  
Yohan Audurier ◽  
Camille Roubille ◽  
Federico Manna ◽  
Laetitia Zerkowski ◽  
Marie Faucanie ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. L Nassaralla ◽  
J. M Naessens ◽  
R. Chaudhry ◽  
M. A Hansen ◽  
S. M Scheitel

2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. B67
Author(s):  
Swapna Kamadana ◽  
Ravish Shah ◽  
Judy Hartman ◽  
Sheri S. Vancleef ◽  
Christopher Valentine

Drugs & Aging ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 387-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Andreoli ◽  
Jean-François Alexandra ◽  
Chloé Tesmoingt ◽  
Charlotte Eerdekens ◽  
Annick Macrez ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 407-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cherinne Arundel ◽  
Jessica Logan ◽  
Ribka Ayana ◽  
Jacqueline Gannuscio ◽  
Jennifer Kerns ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background Medication errors during hospitalization are a major patient safety concern. Medication reconciliation is an effective tool to reduce medication errors, yet internal medicine residents rarely receive formal education on the process. Objective We assessed if an educational intervention on quality improvement principles and effective medication reconciliation for internal medicine residents will lead to fewer medication discrepancies and more accurate discharge medication lists. Methods From July 2012 to May 2013, internal medicine residents from 3 academic institutions who were rotating at the Washington DC VA Medical Center received twice-monthly interactive educational sessions on medication reconciliation, using both institutional summary metrics and data from their own discharges. Sessions were led by a faculty member or chief resident. Accuracy of discharge instructions for residents in the intervention group was compared to the accuracy of discharge data from June 2012 for a group of residents who did not receive the intervention. We used χ2 analysis to assess for differences. Results The number of duplicate medications (23% versus 12%, P = .01); extraneous medications (14% versus 6%, P = .014); medications sorted by disease or indication (25% versus 77%, P < .001); and the number of discrepancies in discharge summaries (34% versus 11%, P < .001) statistically improved. No difference in the number of omissions was found between the 2 groups (17% versus 15%, P = .62). Conclusions An educational intervention targeting internal medicine residents can be implemented with reasonable staff and time costs, and is effective in reducing the number of medication discrepancies at discharge.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Ida Ayu Manik Partha Sutema ◽  
IBN Maharjana

Background: Pharmacists have an important role in implementing drug reconciliation. The implementation of drug reconciliation allows the process of identifying drug administration errors due to information gaps, which we can avoid by optimizing information as early as possible at every shift in the process of providing health services through the reconciliation process. This process is crucial, especially for groups of patients with chronic diseases who have a high risk of changing health care delivery settings. Failure to identify results in errors in administering drugs that lead to worsening clinical conditions, resulting in increased service needs and health costs. Objective: Provides information about the tendency of pharmacists who work at the UPTD Bali Mandara General Hospital to reduce drug use errors through the drug reconciliation program. Methods: Thematic analysis of structured interview results. Results: Almost all participants (6 out of 8 pharmacists) tend to be willing to be involved in the drug reconciliation process. There are three main themes of consideration that underlie the tendency of pharmacists to be willing to be involved in the drug reconciliation process, namely, related to understanding the definition, purpose, and consistency of the implementation of reconciliation. In controlling the incidence of medication errors, the biggest preventable errors through medication reconciliation are drug duplication and drug discrepancy. Conclusion: The tendency for pharmacists to be involved is good, and the tendency to control the risk of medication errors is still lacking in terms of communication and consistency in filling out by all officers. Keywords: Pharmacist’s role, drug reconciliation, risk of medication errors


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document