Qualitative study of nuclear medicine physicians' perceptions of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in pregnant patients with cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 51 (10) ◽  
pp. 1722-1726
Author(s):  
Pietro Di Ciaccio ◽  
Louise Emmett ◽  
Nada Hamad
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Positron Emission Tomography ◽  
Nuclear Medicine ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Emission Tomography ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Positron Emission

scholarly journals The EANM practice guidelines for parathyroid imaging

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petra Petranović Ovčariček ◽  
Luca Giovanella ◽  
Ignasi Carrió Gasset ◽  
Elif Hindié ◽  
Martin W. Huellner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Positron Emission Tomography ◽  
Nuclear Medicine ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Minimally Invasive Parathyroidectomy ◽  
Parathyroid Glands ◽  
Emission Tomography ◽  
Invasive Parathyroidectomy ◽  
Positron Emission ◽  
Parathyroid Imaging

Abstract Introduction Nuclear medicine parathyroid imaging is important in the identification of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands in primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT), but it may be also valuable before surgical treatment in secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT). Parathyroid radionuclide imaging with scintigraphy or positron emission tomography (PET) is a highly sensitive procedure for the assessment of the presence and number of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands, located either at typical sites or ectopically. The treatment of pHPT is mostly directed toward minimally invasive parathyroidectomy, especially in cases with a single adenoma. In experienced hands, successful surgery depends mainly on the exact preoperative localization of one or more hyperfunctioning parathyroid adenomas. Failure to preoperatively identify the hyperfunctioning parathyroid gland challenges minimally invasive parathyroidectomy and might require bilateral open neck exploration. Methods Over a decade has now passed since the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) issued the first edition of the guideline on parathyroid imaging, and a number of new insights and techniques have been developed since. The aim of the present document is to provide state-of-the-art guidelines for nuclear medicine physicians performing parathyroid scintigraphy, single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT), positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), and positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) in patients with pHPT, as well as in those with sHPT. Conclusion These guidelines are written and authorized by the EANM to promote optimal parathyroid imaging. They will assist nuclear medicine physicians in the detection and correct localization of hyperfunctioning parathyroid lesions.

scholarly journals Polymyalgia rheumatica in the 2018–2020 guidelines. Part II: diagnosis of vasculitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
О.H. Puzanova ◽  
А.А. Lyzikov
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Positron Emission Tomography ◽  
Nuclear Medicine ◽  
Giant Cell Arteritis ◽  
Giant Cell ◽  
Computed Tomography Angiography ◽  
Polymyalgia Rheumatica ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Emission Tomography ◽  
Positron Emission

The issue of improved diagnosis of both rheumatic diseases of the elderly and aortic diseases does not lose its relevance. In terms of aortic aneurysms, dissection and ruptures and their attended pathogenesis, both inflammation and structural wall damages may be detected with imaging methods whose role is vital. A number of international guidelines deal with the ma­nagement of polymyalgia rheumatica, giant cell arteritis, or aortic aneurysms. Aortitis is associated with up to 40 % of polymyalgia rheumatica’s cases. The clinical suspicion of aortitis is based on the detection of blood pressure and pulse asymmetry, aortic regurgitation murmur, vascular bruits, as well as persistent polymyalgia rheumatica or inflammatory dorsalgia, pelvis or leg pain. In 2020, the positron emission tomography/computed tomography’s use is approved by the Italian Society for Rheumatology for the diagnosis of vasculitis attended by polymyalgia rheumatica at the secon­dary healthcare level and by the European Headache Federation for the diagnosis of large vessel giant cell arteritis in the neurological practice. A review of the guideline by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology (2018) was performed in terms of po­sitron emission tomography with fluorodesoxyglucose combined with computed tomography (angiography) imaging in large vessel vasculitis and polymyalgia rheumatica. It is further compared with the clinical guidelines, other guidelines by the societies of nuclear medicine and new scientific data. Both procedure and patient’s preparation for examination are decribed. The criteria for assessing vasculitis proposed for either clinical practice or cli­nical studies are consi­dered, as well as the factors influencing the test results and their interpretation (such as atherosclerosis, diabetes, age, body mass index, glucemia’s and acute phase markers’ levels). The guideline substantiates the benefit of both positron emission tomography’s use and its combination with computed tomography to detect extracranial vasculitis, as well as the va­lue of performing computed tomography-angiography at different stages of the disease. There is a need to strengthen evidence on both standard time of fluorodesoxyglucose exposure and the benefit of combining positron emission tomography with computed tomography-angiography, in particular for detection of vasculitis relapses. Finding a consensus for early test’s performing is nee­ded, as well as its score standardization, ensuring reimbursement and implementation of new imaging techniques for the cranial vessels. In the future, the evidence-based approach to managing vasculitis will be supplemented by teranostics.

scholarly journals Polymyalgia rheumatica in the 2018–2020 clinical guidelines. Part I. At-risk groups, adjuvant therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 161-173
Author(s):  
О.G. Puzanovа
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Positron Emission Tomography ◽  
Nuclear Medicine ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Giant Cell Arteritis ◽  
Giant Cell ◽  
Polymyalgia Rheumatica ◽  
Emission Tomography ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Positron Emission

At the beginning of the Healthy Ageing Decade, a number of guidelines were published describing management of the rheumatic diseases of the elderly. The aim of the paper is to cha­racterize and discuss the Italian Society of Rheumatology’s guideline for polymyalgia rheumatica (2020) and the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardio­logy’s (2018) recommendation for positron-emission tomography/computed tomography imaging to diagnose the large vessel vasculitis and polymyalgia rheumatica. The following methods were used: original texts of recommedations, their content and methodology behind the development of both guidelines were studied by means of information analysis and compared with the recommendations for the management of polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis elaborated in 2018–2020 by the European League Against Rheumatism, American College of Rheumatology; the German, Austrian, Swiss and British rheumatological societies; the European Headache Federation and their references. We’ve established the priority of consensus approach for the development of modern guidelines for polymyalgia rheumatica. The specific feature of the Italian guideline’s development is the search for prototypes restric­ted to the two evidence-based medicine databases and the grey li­terature as well as selection of three international guidelines for ­adaptation, one of them elaborated by the societies for nuclear me­dicine. The following issues were updated: the patient management in primary care (whose algorithm is proposed), including the conserted clinical decision-making and alertness to the giant cell arteritis. Out of the first-line therapy tools, only the initial doses of glucocorticoids are evidence-based, and their reduction is allowed as an alternating regimen. The ineffectiveness of hydroxichloroquine use is justified, while both azathioprine and alternative medical drugs are not subject to discussion. It is necessary to identify the risk factors for vasculitis and its relapses, longterm glucocorticoid use and their side effects. For the first time, the use of positron-emission tomography/computed tomography is recommended for detecting of vasculitis. The recommendation for adjuvant therapy with methotrexate and abstaining from the biologic agents is found the most evidence-based, strongest and consistent; referral to a rheumatologist being the least agreed-on position. Conclusion. Solving such an urgent healthcare problem as improving the quality of polymyalgia rheumatic management suggests the medical standards being raised on the most clinically important issues, the importance of at-risk patient identification and referral to rheumatologists and ophthalmologists, and consideration of the methotrexate’s benefits.

Imaging of the Diabetic Foot Diagnostic Dilemmas

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 249-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Loredo ◽  
Andres Rahal ◽  
Glenn Garcia ◽  
Darlene Metter
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Positron Emission Tomography ◽  
Nuclear Medicine ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Conventional Radiography ◽  
Emission Tomography ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Positron Emission

Multiple diagnostic imaging modalities are available and beneficial for the evaluation of the diabetic foot. There is not yet “one best test” for sorting out the diagnostic dilemmas commonly encountered. The differentiation of cellulitis alone from underlying osteomyelitis and the early detection of abscesses remain important diagnostic goals. Equally important, differentiation of osteomyelitis and neuroarthropathy remains a difficult job. This is often compounded by postoperative diabetic foot states status after reconstruction. Diagnostic evaluation often involves multiple studies that are complementary and that include conventional radiography, computed tomography, nuclear medicine scintigraphy, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and positron emission tomography.

The Potential Value of Hybrid Positron Emission Tomography/Dual-Source Computed Tomography Imaging in Coronary Bypass Surgery

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre Plass ◽  
Maximilian Y. Emmert ◽  
Oliver Gaemperli ◽  
Hatem Alkadhi ◽  
Philipp Kaufmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Positron Emission Tomography ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Myocardial Perfusion ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Bypass Surgery ◽  
Emission Tomography ◽  
Positron Emission ◽  
Pet Ct

<p><b>Background:</b> We evaluated how comprehensive assessment of coronary artery lesions and their hemodynamic relevance by means of hybrid positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) imaging would affect decision-making in coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), compared with using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) alone.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> After undergoing ICA, 27 patients (21 men and 6 women; mean SD age, 66 � 10 years) planned for cardiac surgery were scheduled for myocardial perfusion stress/rest evaluation with [13N]ammonia PET and CT coronary angiography. Only ICA was available to the surgeon. Postoperatively, the performed CABG was compared with the hypothetical strategy based on hybrid PET/CT findings (regional coronary flow reserve [CFR], myocardial perfusion defects). Procedures included CABG (n = 18) alone, CABG combined with valve replacement (n = 6), and CABG combined with isolated valve replacement (n = 3). A total of 56 bypass grafts (28 venous and 28 arterial) and 66 distal anastomoses were placed.</p><p><b>Results:</b> CT evaluation showed 93% concordance (66/71) with ICA regarding significant stenoses, with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 93.1%, 98.7%, 94.4%, and 98.4%, respectively. In the PET scan, 16 patients had 1 ischemic region, and 12 patients had 1 scar region, including 5 patients who presented with mixed conditions (scar and ischemia). One patient had a completely normal myocardium. Compared with the performed surgery, PET/CT fusion evaluation showed that of the performed anastomoses, 48% had documented ischemia (with a CFR <2 in 86%), 38% were nonischemic (although a CFR value <2 was found in 78%), and 14% had scar tissue (fixed perfusion defect).</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Although <50% of bypasses were placed to areas with myocardial ischemia, the CFR was low in the majority of nonischemic regions, a finding that may have important prognostic relevance. PET/CT fusion imaging could potentially influence planning for CABG and provide incremental prognostic information.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document