Outcomes of a co-facilitation skills training programme for mental health service users, family members, and clinicians: the EOLAS project

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 911-921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnes Higgins ◽  
David Hevey ◽  
Fiona Boyd ◽  
Ned Cusack ◽  
Carmel Downes ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (9) ◽  
pp. 826-833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Kokanović ◽  
Lisa Brophy ◽  
Bernadette McSherry ◽  
Jacinthe Flore ◽  
Kristen Moeller-Saxone ◽  
...  

Background: Supporting the decision-making of mental health service users fulfils professional, ethical and moral obligations of mental health practitioners. It may also aid personal recovery. Previous research on the effectiveness of supported decision-making interventions is limited. Aims: The study aims to explore from several perspectives the barriers and facilitators to supported decision-making in an Australian context. Supported decision-making was considered in terms of interpersonal experiences and legal supported decision-making mechanisms. Methods: In all, 90 narrative interviews about experiences of supported decision-making were conducted and analysed. Participants were mental health service users who reported diagnoses of schizophrenia, psychosis, bipolar disorder and severe depression; family members supporting them and mental health practitioners, including psychiatrists. The data were analysed thematically across all participants. Results: Negative interpersonal experiences in the mental health care system undermined involvement in decision-making for people with psychiatric diagnoses and family carers. Mental health practitioners noted their own disempowerment in service systems as barriers to good supported decision-making practices. All groups noted the influence of prevailing attitudes towards mental health service users and the associated stigma and discrimination that exist in services and the broader community. They believed that legal supported decision-making mechanisms facilitate the participation of mental health service user and their family supporters in supported decision-making. Conclusions: Enabling supported decision-making in clinical practice and policy can be facilitated by (1) support for good communication skills and related attitudes and practices among mental health practitioners and removing barriers to their good practice in health and social services and (2) introducing legal supported decision-making mechanisms.


Author(s):  
Antonio Lasalvia ◽  
Antonio Vita ◽  
Antonello Bellomo ◽  
Massimo Tusconi ◽  
Gerardo Favaretto ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Garcia-Cubillana de la Cruz ◽  
Aguila bono del Trigo ◽  
Vicente Ibanez Rojo ◽  
Evelyn Huizing

2021 ◽  
pp. 100059
Author(s):  
Julie Dare ◽  
Helen Seiver ◽  
Lesley Andrew ◽  
David Coall ◽  
Shantha Karthigesu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 103985622110286
Author(s):  
Russ Scott ◽  
Andrew Aboud

Objective: Consider whether mental health service users and carers meaningfully engage in care planning and whether care planning adds value to patient care. Conclusion: A review of the meta-analyses and systematic reviews of service users and carers identified many barriers to their meaningful engagement in care planning. No research has demonstrated any measurable benefits or positive outcomes linked to mental health care planning.


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 30-34
Author(s):  
David Lees ◽  
Nicholas Procter ◽  
Denise Fassett ◽  
Christine Handley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document