Imperfect price discrimination, market structure, and efficiency

Author(s):  
Qihong Liu ◽  
Konstantinos Serfes
2013 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 12-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Haskel ◽  
Alberto Iozzi ◽  
Tommaso Valletti

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 156-187
Author(s):  
Andre Boik ◽  
Hidenori Takahashi

We study how changes in market structure affect how firms engage in second-degree price discrimination. Specifically, we study how a large incumbent cable firm changes its menu of price-quality offerings and mixed bundles in response to entry. Competition strongly decreases the rate at which prices increase in quality and induces the incumbent to introduce additional medium- to high-quality offerings that the incumbent could have introduced absent competition but chose not to. Our findings are relevant for the broadband industry because they suggest that competition can improve broadband quality through direct pricing effects without any changes in investment in maximum quality. (JEL D21, D22, D43, L13, L42, L82)


2017 ◽  
pp. 93-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Anchishkina

The article synthesizes information on database analysis of state, municipal, and regulated procurement through which Russian contract institutions and the market model are investigated. The inherent uncertainty of quantity indicators on contracting activities and process is identified and explained. The article provides statistical evidence for heterogeneous market structure in state and municipal procurement, and big player’s dominance. A theoretical model for market behavior, noncooperative competition and collusion is proposed, through which the major trends are explained. The intrinsic flaws and failure of the current contracting model are revealed and described. This ineffectiveness is regarded to be not a limitation, but a challenge to be met. If responded to, drivers for economic growth and market equilibrium will be switched on.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document