scholarly journals Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: what a physician should know, a decade after its introduction in clinical practice

2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 318-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.H. SAKORAFAS ◽  
G. PEROS
2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 102-102
Author(s):  
Anne-Marie Meyer ◽  
Katherine Elizabeth Reeder-Hayes ◽  
Huan Liu ◽  
Stephanie B. Wheeler ◽  
Dolly Penn ◽  
...  

102 Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a quality indicator for breast cancer care. Provider-based research networks (PBRNs) promote diffusion of innovations like SLNB into clinical practice; however, evidence is limited. We examined the diffusion of SLNB for early-stage breast cancer through the Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP), a community-based PBRN and its interaction with medical school affiliation. Methods: We identified women undergoing breast conserving surgery with axillary staging for stage I or II breast cancer between January 2000 and December 2003 using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare data (n=6,226). The primary outcome was receipt of SLNB vs. ALND. Exposure was constructed by combining information on the CCOP affiliation of the preforming physician with the medical school affiliation of the hospital. Covariates included race, age, marital status, education, Medicaid eligibility, comorbidity, tumor grade, stage, estrogen receptor status, year of diagnosis, SEER region, and NCI cancer center designation. Multivariable generalized linear modeling with generalized estimating equations was used to measure association between CCOP exposure and receipt of SLNB. Results: Women who saw a CCOP physician at a hospital affiliated with a medical school had a three-fold increase in odds of receiving SLNB compared to non-CCOP women. In contrast, the odds of SLNB were equivalent when looking in women who were seen by a CCOP physician but differed only by their hospital affiliation. Conclusions: Women seen by CCOP-affiliated physicians were more likely to receive SLNB; while medical school affiliation did appear to significantly impact receipt. Innovative, high-quality cancer care can be facilitated PBRNs such as the NCI CCOP program. There must be mechanisms by which providers are exposed to advances in clinical practice outside of organizational affiliations. [Table: see text]


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6104-6104
Author(s):  
Anne-Marie Meyer ◽  
Katherine Elizabeth Reeder-Hayes ◽  
Huan Liu ◽  
Stephanie B. Wheeler ◽  
Dolly Penn ◽  
...  

6104 Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for breast cancer was introduced into clinical practice in the late 1990s as an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Provider-based research networks (PBRNs) are believed to promote diffusion of innovations like SLNB into clinical practice; however, evidence of this association is limited. This study examines the diffusion of SLNB for early-stage breast cancer through the Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP), a community-based PBRN. Methods: We identified women undergoing breast conserving surgery with axillary staging for stage I or II breast cancer between January 2000 and December 2003 using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare data (n=6,226). The primary outcome was receipt of SLNB vs. ALND, and exposure was care received from CCOP physicians or institutions between diagnosis and surgery. Exposure was quantified as both a binary measure of ever seeing a CCOP, and as a proportion of all their claims associated with a CCOP. Covariates included race, age, marital status, education, Medicaid eligibility, comorbidity, tumor grade, stage, estrogen receptor status, year of diagnosis, SEER region, and other institutional characteristics such as NCI center designation, cooperative group, and medical school affiliation. Multivariable generalized linear modeling with generalized estimating equations was used to measure association between CCOP exposure and receipt of SLNB. Results: Women who received a higher proportion of their care from a CCOP-affiliated physician or hospital were more likely to receive SLNB. A 10% increase in the proportion of CCOP-affiliated claims was associated with a greater odds of receiving SLNB (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.08, 1.20), after controlling for covariates. Similarly, sensitivity analysis of the binary indicator of CCOP exposure also showed greater odds of receiving SLNB (OR 1.32; 95%CI 1.01, 1.74). Conclusions: The quality of cancer care delivered in community settings can be influenced by provider-based research networks. Our findings contribute to the growing body of evidence that community-based PBRNs can facilitate adoption of cancer innovations outside of academic medical centers.


2012 ◽  
Vol 65 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 363-367
Author(s):  
Andrija Golubovic ◽  
Milan Ranisavljevic ◽  
Zoran Radovanovic ◽  
Vladimir Selakovic ◽  
Aljosa Mandic ◽  
...  

Introduction. Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer has been a standard procedure at the Institute for Oncology of Vojvodina since 1999 and we have done more than 700 biopsy. Before the introduction of axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy, lymph nodes were routinely dissected, and this approach was the gold standard in surgical treatment of breast cancer. The study was aimed at presenting our results in performing sentinel node biopsy in clinical practice for operative treatment in breast cancer. Material and Methods. All patients (n=791) were women with clinically T1-2, N0-1, M0 breast cancer. Sentinel lymph node marking was performed by both contrast blue dye (Patentblau V) and radiotracer (antimony sulfide marked with Tc99m). Both contrast media were applied peritumorally or periareolarly. After sentinel lymph node biopsy all patients underwent breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy with or without lymph node dissection of level I and II (depending on sentinel lymph node status). Results. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was negative in 543 (68.7%) patients, and positive in 248 (31.3%) patients. Solitary tumor was present in 722 (91.2%) cases, multifocal tumors in 36 (4.57%), multicentric in 28 (3.55%) and bilateral in 5 (0.68%) patients. The mean duration of follow-up was 60.59 months (median 65, range 12- 132). Distant metastases were mostly found in bones (39.13%). Conclusion. The number of complications related to axillary dissection can be reduced and the patient?s quality of life can be improved by avoiding complete axillary lymph node dissection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document