Real-time reverse transcription-PCR and fluorescence in-situ hybridization are complementary to understand the mechanisms involved in HER-2/neu overexpression in human breast carcinomas

2005 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 431-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Vanden Bempt ◽  
V Vanhentenrijk ◽  
M Drijkoningen ◽  
I Wlodarska ◽  
P Vandenberghe ◽  
...  
2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (21) ◽  
pp. 3651-3664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Pauletti ◽  
Suganda Dandekar ◽  
HongMei Rong ◽  
Lilllian Ramos ◽  
HongJun Peng ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) in detecting the HER-2/neu alteration in human breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Unselected stage I, II, and III breast cancer patients (N = 900) were tested for HER-2/neu gene amplification by FISH in paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed archival material. Of these samples, 856 were tested for HER-2/neu overexpression by non–antigen-retrieval IHC with the polyclonal antibody R60, the sensitivity and specificity of which was preliminarily compared with the United States Food and Drug Administration–approved HercepTest (Dako Corp, Carpinteria, CA). Patient survival was analyzed in relation to the presence of the HER-2/neu alteration as determined by these two methodologies. RESULTS: A total of 189 (21%) of 900 patients were positive by FISH and 147 (17.2%) of 856 were positive by IHC. This discrepancy is consistent with expected loss of IHC sensitivity associated with tissue fixation/embedding. The HercepTest did not improve sensitivity and introduced false positives. Comparison of R60-based IHC with FISH demonstrates that patient survival is associated progressively to gene amplification level as determined by FISH, whereas for IHC an association is found only in the highest (3+) immunostaining group. Among FISH-negative tumors, 45 (6.6%) of 678 were IHC-positive, with a survival probability similar to that of FISH-negative/IHC-negative cases; FISH-positive/IHC-negative patients have a survival probability similar to that of FISH-positive/IHC-positive cases. CONCLUSION: IHC does not consistently discriminate patients likely to have a poor prognosis, whereas FISH provides superior prognostic information in segregating high-risk from lower-risk beast cancers. HER-2/neu protein overexpression in the absence of gene amplification occurs infrequently in breast cancer, in which case, patient outcome is similar to that of patients without the alteration.


2005 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 1093-1101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chantal Tse ◽  
Didier Brault ◽  
Joseph Gligorov ◽  
Martine Antoine ◽  
Rainer Neumann ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: HER-2 status is generally determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Both methods are only semiquantitative, require a tumor sample, and can be difficult to reproduce. We compared these methods with 2 quantitative approaches, one measuring HER-2 gene copy number in tissue by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), and the other measuring shed HER-2 protein in serum by ELISA in patients with metastatic disease. Methods: We analyzed 52 cases of metastatic breast cancer for which both serum collected at the diagnosis of metastasis and stored primary breast tumor specimens were available. The within- and between-run imprecision of real-time qPCR and ELISA were evaluated according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (formerly known as NCCLS) recommendations. Concordance among the 4 methods was assessed by calculating the κ statistic and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: The CVs for within- and between-run imprecision were both <10% with qPCR and ELISA. There was good agreement of results between qPCR and IHC (κ = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.64–0.99), qPCR and FISH (κ = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.58–0.96), ELISA and IHC (κ = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.41–0.89); and ELISA and FISH (κ = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.46–0.92). Conclusions: Measurements of HER-2 gene expression by qPCR and of serum HER-2 protein by ELISA are highly reproducible approaches for determining HER-2 status in metastatic breast cancer. In addition, ELISA eliminates the need for biopsy.


Cytometry ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 136-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura E. Janocko ◽  
Kathryn A. Brown ◽  
Charles A. Smith ◽  
Ling Ping Gu ◽  
Agnese A. Pollice ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
pp. 15-20
Author(s):  
Van Huy Tran ◽  
Thi Minh Thi Ha ◽  
Trung Nghia Van ◽  
Viet Nhan Nguyen ◽  
Phan Tuong Quynh Le ◽  
...  

Background: HER-2/neu is a predictive biomarker for treatment of gastric cancer using trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the status of HER-2/neu gene amplification using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in gastric cancer. Patients and methods: thirty six gastric cancer patients were assessed HER-2/neu gene amplification by FISH using PathVysionTM HER-2 DNA Probe kit (including HER-2/neu probe and CEP-17 probe) with biopsy and surgical specimens. Results: The HER-2/neu gene amplification was observed in three cases (8.3%), the HER-2/neu gene amplification rate in Lauren’s intestinal-type and diffuse-type were 11.8% and 5.2%, respectively. Conclusion: We applied successfully FISH technique with gastric cancer tissue samples. This technique could be performed as routine test in gastric cancer in order to select patients that benefit from trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document