scholarly journals Reproductive decisions by couples undergoing artificial insemination with donor sperm for severe male infertility: implications for medical counselling

2005 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. VERNAEVE ◽  
V. FESTRE ◽  
P. BAETENS ◽  
P. DEVROEY ◽  
A. VAN STEIRTEGHEM ◽  
...  
1986 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone B. Novaes

Artificial insemination with donor semen (AID) has recently come into public view—particularly in France—because of its association with a newer technique, the cryopreservation of semen. One of the oldest and simplest of reproductive techniques, used most frequently as a means of compensating for male infertility, artificial insemination was previously confined to the private clinician's office, where maximum confidentiality could be ensured. This shielded all of the parties involved—recipients, donor, and physician—from moral reprobation and the possible legal complications arising from the use of donor sperm. However, in the mid-twentieth century, some physicians and researchers in cyrogenics came up with the idea that the freezing and stocking of donor semen in banks might greatly improve the psychological conditions and facilitate the material arrangements for performing AID. Essentially, the donor's availability would no longer have to coincide with the woman's ovulation, meaning less inconvenience for the donor, more time for screening his medical history and running the necessary tests on his semen, and possibly a certain tempering of AID's adulterous connotations. Although results with frozen semen were not as satisfactory as with fresh (the probability of a pregnancy at any cycle is almost twice as great with fresh semen), the material and psychological benefits were considered greatly to outweigh the lesser efficiency of frozen sperm.


Author(s):  
Ayo Wahlberg

Once it passes quality control, donor sperm is “released” to the thousands of couples who are involuntarily childless because of azoospermia. Chapter 6 shows how for those infertile couples who “borrow” sperm in China, secrecy is as vital as male infertility is taboo. Through fertility clinics, artificial insemination by donor (AID) emerges as an opportunity to achieve a visible pregnancy, a pregnancy that couples are both in pursuit of and expected to deliver by family and friends. The chapter argues that in one-child policy China, recipient couples and donors mobilize strategies of “hearth” management and trouble avoidance as third-party conception has become acceptable for increasing numbers of involuntarily childless couples who are living with male infertility.


1987 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Vekemans ◽  
Y. Englert ◽  
M. Camus ◽  
G. de Maertelaer

1995 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen R. Lincoln ◽  
Cecil A. Long ◽  
Bryan D. Cowan

Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (16) ◽  
pp. e14975
Author(s):  
Aiping Zhang ◽  
Xiaoling Ma ◽  
Lili Zhang ◽  
Xuehong Zhang ◽  
Weihua Wang

2014 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
Ju-Fen Zheng ◽  
Xiao-Bao Chen ◽  
Lei-Wen Zhao ◽  
Min-Zhi Gao ◽  
Jie Peng ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document