Intra-arterial blood pressure reading in intensive care unit patients in the lateral position

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (13-14) ◽  
pp. 1825-1830 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel JH Aries ◽  
Adnan Aslan ◽  
Jan Willem J Elting ◽  
Roy E Stewart ◽  
Jan G Zijlstra ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. S578-S579
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Peng ◽  
Sarah M. Russell ◽  
Hani Shamseddeen ◽  
Carla D. Kettler ◽  
Caitriona A. Buckley ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jaswinder Kaur ◽  
Siddharth Bhargava ◽  
Puneet Aulakh Pooni ◽  
Deepak Bhat ◽  
Gurdeep S. Dhooria ◽  
...  

AbstractIntra-arterial blood pressure (IABP) measurement, although considered the gold standard in critically ill children, is associated with certain risks and lacks widespread availability. This study was conducted to determine the differences and agreements between oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) and invasive IABP measurements in children. Inclusion criteria consisted of children (from 1 month to 18 years) admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a teaching hospital who required arterial catheter insertion for blood pressure (BP) monitoring. The comparison between IABP and NIBP was studied using paired t-test, Bland–Altman analysis, and Pearson's correlation coefficient. In total, 4,447 pairs of simultaneously recorded hourly NIBP and IABP measurements were collected from 65 children. Mean differences between IABP and NIBP were −3.6 ± 12.85, −4.7 ± 9.3, and −3.12 ± 9.30 mm Hg for systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial BP, respectively (p < 0.001), with wide limits of agreement. NIBP significantly overestimated BP (p < 0.001) in all three BP states (hypotensive, normotensive, and hypertensive), except systolic blood pressure (SBP) during hypertension where IABP was significantly higher. The difference in SBP was most pronounced during hypotension. The difference in SBP was significant in children <10 years (p < 0.001), with the maximum difference being in infants. It was insignificant in adolescents (p = 0.28) and underweight children (p = 0.55). NIBP recorded significantly higher BP in all states of BP except SBP in the hypertensive state. SBP measured by NIBP tended to be the most reliable in adolescents and underweight children. NIBP was the most unreliable in infants, obese children, and during hypotension.


IEEE Access ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. 1-1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petre Lameski ◽  
Eftim Zdravevski ◽  
Saso Koceski ◽  
Andrea Kulakov ◽  
Vladimir Trajkovik

1999 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 475-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
MJ Grap ◽  
M Cantley ◽  
CL Munro ◽  
MC Corley

BACKGROUND: Use of lower backrest positions occurs frequently and is a factor in the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia. OBJECTIVES: To determine the usual bed elevation and backrest position in a medical intensive care unit and their relationship to hemodynamic status and enteral feeding. METHODS: Data were collected in a 12-bed medical respiratory intensive care unit for 2 months. A protractor was used to measure the elevation of the head of the bed. Hemodynamic status was defined by systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure measurements retrieved from each patient's flow sheet. RESULTS: The sample included 347 measurements of 52 patients. Mean backrest elevation was 22.9 degrees, and 86% of patients were supine. Backrest position differed significantly (P = .005) among nursing shifts (days, evenings, nights) but not for systolic (r = -0.04, P = .49), diastolic (r = 0.01, P = .83), or mean arterial blood pressure (r = -0.01, P = .84). Backrest elevation did not differ significantly between patients who were receiving enteral feedings and patients who were not (P = .23) or between patients receiving intermittent versus continuous nutrition (P = .22). CONCLUSIONS: Use of higher levels of backrest elevation (&gt; or = 30 degrees) is minimal and is not related to use of enteral feeding or to hemodynamic status. The rationale for using lower backrest positions for critically ill patients may be based on convenience, the patient's comfort, or usual patterns in the unit. However, the dangers of supine positioning and its relationship to aspiration and ventilator-associated pneumonia should not be minimized.


2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ainnur Rahmanti ◽  
Dyah Kartika Putri

Patient with critical condition had high morbidity and mortality rate. This condition is worsened by long term immobilization. Instability vital sign made nurses stationed delayed mobilization activities in ICU. Progressive mobilization must be started for ICU patient to decrease respiratory function, level of awareness and cardiovascular function. The objective of this study was to identify progressive mobilization activities on blood pressure parameters among critical patients in ICU. The design of this study was quai experiment design. Thirty respondents were included to the study using concequtive sampling. Progressive mobilization was given with head of bed 300 (HOB 300), head of bed450 (HOB 450) with  passive range of motion, continued with right and left lateral position. Anova repeated measurement was used to identify mean difference each of blood pressure. The result of this study show there is two moment sistolic change between HOB 300 to HOB 450 and HOB 450 to right lateral position (3,3%). There is nine moment diastolic change between HOB 450 to right lateral position (16,7%).   Keywords: blood pressure, ICU, Progressive mobilization


2020 ◽  
Vol 129 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-316
Author(s):  
Marije Wijnberge ◽  
Jaap Schuurmans ◽  
Rob B. P. de Wilde ◽  
Martijn K. Kerstens ◽  
Alexander P. Vlaar ◽  
...  

In a cohort of 311 intensive care unit (ICU) patients, median mean circulatory filling pressure (Pmcf) measured after cardiac arrest was 15 mmHg (interquartile range 12–18). In 48% of cases, arterial blood pressure remained higher than central venous pressure, but correction for arterial-to-venous compliance differences did not result in clinically relevant alterations of Pmcf. Fluid balance, use of vasopressors or inotropes, and being on mechanical ventilation were associated with a higher Pmcf.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document