medical intensive care unit
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

1152
(FIVE YEARS 138)

H-INDEX

68
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2022 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 129-135
Author(s):  
Pavel Sinyagovskiy ◽  
Prem R. Warde ◽  
Bhavarth Shukla ◽  
Dipen J. Parekh ◽  
Tanira Ferreira ◽  
...  


Author(s):  
Jacob P. Counts ◽  
Jessica L. Elefritz ◽  
Erica E. Reed ◽  
Marilly Palettas ◽  
Connor Aossey ◽  
...  


Heart & Lung ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. 17-21
Author(s):  
Ana Vujaklija Brajković ◽  
Marta Grgat ◽  
Luka Bielen ◽  
Jurica Brajković ◽  
Ozrenka Zlopaša ◽  
...  


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-52
Author(s):  
Burhan Sami Kalın ◽  
Süleyman Özçaylak ◽  
İhsan Solmaz ◽  
Jehat Kılıç


2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 340-340
Author(s):  
Jacob Counts ◽  
Jessica Elefritz ◽  
Erica Reed ◽  
Connor Aossey ◽  
Marilly Palettas ◽  
...  


2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 683-683
Author(s):  
Karthik Kailasam ◽  
Abhishek Bhardwaj ◽  
Justin Hanks ◽  
Tarik Hanane ◽  
Deborah Rathz ◽  
...  


2021 ◽  
pp. 105477382110589
Author(s):  
Ji-Sun Back ◽  
Taixian Jin ◽  
Huiying Jin ◽  
Sun-Mi Lee

This study aimed to determine patient and therapeutic characteristics of patients in the medical intensive care unit (MICU) that contribute to inconsistent results of delirium assessments performed during routine clinical practice. Therefore, electronic health records were reviewed and compared with secondary data collected from the same medical ICU patients who were assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method in the ICU (CAM-ICU). Of 5,241 cases involving 762 patients, 827 (15.78%) cases showed disagreement between assessments. Continuous renal replacement therapy, physical restraint use, and altered mental status were factors that increased the likelihood of inconsistencies between assessments. A significant positive correlation was found between the CAM-ICU disagreement rate and the total number of assessments per month. To maximize the reliability of delirium assessments, individual-targeted approaches considering the patient’s level of consciousness and type of treatment implemented are required, along with ensuring a stable, and regulated working environment and customized educational programs.





2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802110533
Author(s):  
Lara M. Groetzinger ◽  
Julia Williams ◽  
Susan Svec ◽  
Michael P. Donahoe ◽  
Phillip E. Lamberty ◽  
...  

Background: Reducing central venous catheter (CVC) utilization can reduce complications in the intensive care unit (ICU). While norepinephrine (NE) is traditionally administered via a CVC, lower concentrations may be safely administered via peripheral intravenous (PIV) lines. Objective: We aimed to describe the implementation of a pilot protocol utilizing PIVs to administer a low-dose and lower-concentration NE, review the number of CVCs avoided, and evaluate any adverse events. Methods: In a quaternary medical intensive care unit (MICU), from March 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020, we reviewed charts for CVC placement and adverse events from the pNE infusion. We also measured unit-level CVC utilization in all MICU patients and assessed the change in utilization associated with the peripheral norepinephrine (pNE) protocol. Results: Over a 1-year period, 87 patients received a pNE infusion. Overall, 44 patients (51%) never required CVC placement during their MICU stay. Three patients (3%) experienced adverse events, none of which were documented as serious and or required antidote for treatment. Implementation of the protocol was associated with a decrease in the number of patients at the unit level who received CVCs, even if they did not receive pNE. Conclusion and Relevance: In this small pilot study, we pragmatically demonstrated that pNE is safe and may reduce the need for CVC placement. This information can be used to aid in pNE protocol development and implementation at other institutions, but further research should be done to confirm the safety of routine use of pNE in clinical practice.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document