Morphometric evaluation of oesophageal wall in patients with nutcracker oesophagus and ineffective oesophageal motility

2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 869-876 ◽  
Author(s):  
h. s. kim ◽  
h. park ◽  
j. h. lim ◽  
s. h. choi ◽  
c. park ◽  
...  
Endoscopy ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 37 (05) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Ravi ◽  
N Al-Sarraf ◽  
T Moran ◽  
J O'Riordan ◽  
S Rowley ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 2810
Author(s):  
Joanna Gudowicz ◽  
Renata Paluszkiewicz

The rapid development of remote sensing technology for obtaining high-resolution digital elevation models (DEMs) in recent years has made them more and more widely available and has allowed them to be used for morphometric assessment of concave landforms, such as valleys, gullies, glacial cirques, sinkholes, craters, and others. The aim of this study was to develop a geographic information systems (GIS) toolbox for the automatic extraction of 26 morphometric characteristics, which include the geometry, hypsometry, and volume of concave landforms. The Morphometry Assessment Tools (MAT) toolbox in the ArcGIS software was developed. The required input data are a digital elevation model and the form boundary as a vector layer. The method was successfully tested on an example of 21 erosion-denudation valleys located in the young glacial area of northwest Poland. Calculations were based on elevation data collected in the field and LiDAR data. The results obtained with the tool showed differences in the assessment of the volume parameter at the average level of 12%, when comparing the field data and LiDAR data. The algorithm can also be applied to other types of concave forms, as well as being based on other DEM data sources, which makes it a universal tool for morphometric evaluation.


1991 ◽  
Vol 150 (9) ◽  
pp. 638-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Staiano ◽  
S. Cucchiara ◽  
E. Del Giudice ◽  
M. R. Andreotti ◽  
R. Minella

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. S. Magesh ◽  
K. V. Jitheshlal ◽  
N. Chandrasekar ◽  
K. V. Jini

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oleksandr Khoma ◽  
Maite Jeanne Mendu ◽  
Amita Nandini Sen ◽  
Hans Van der Wall ◽  
Gregory Leighton Falk

Abstract Introduction Severe oesophageal dysmotility is associated with treatment resistant reflux and pulmonary reflux aspiration. Delayed solid gastric emptying (SGE) has been associated with oesophageal dysmotility, however the role of delayed liquid gastric emptying (LGE) in the pathophysiology of severe reflux disease remains unknown. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between delayed LGE, reflux aspiration and oesophageal dysmotility. Methods Data was extracted from a prospectively populated database of patients with severe treatment resistant gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). All patients with validated reflux aspiration scintigraphy (RASP) and oesophageal manometry were included in the analysis. Patients were classified by predominant clinical subtype as gastro-oesophageal (GOR) or laryngo-pharyngeal (LPR) reflux. LGE time of 22 minutes or longer was considered delayed. Results Inclusion criteria were met by 631 patients. Normal LGE time was found in 450 patients, whilst 181 had evidence of delayed LGE. Mean liquid half-clearance was 22.81min. Refux aspiration was evident in 240 patients (38%). Difference in the aspiration rates between delayed LGE (42%) and normal LGE (36%) was not significant (p=0.16). Severe ineffective oesophageal motility (IOM) was found in 70 patients (35%) and was independent of LGE time. Severe IOM was strongly associated with reflux aspiration (p<0.001). GOR dominant symptoms were more common in patients with delayed LGE (p=0.03). Conclusion Severe IOM was strongly associated with reflux aspiration. Delayed LGE is not associated with reflux aspiration or severe IOM. Delayed LGE is more prevalent in patients presenting with GOR dominant symptoms.


1989 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Breedijk ◽  
A. J. P. M. Smout ◽  
C. van der Zouw ◽  
H. Verwey ◽  
L. M. A. Akkermans

2005 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxin Ma ◽  
Noboru Goto ◽  
Jun Goto ◽  
Hiromitsu Ezure ◽  
Naoko Nonaka

2021 ◽  
pp. 135973
Author(s):  
José Ademar Villanova Junior ◽  
Maria Angélica B. Magalhães ◽  
Tainah D. Cereja de Souza ◽  
Michelly Kheidy Borges Battisti ◽  
Jair Rodini E. Filho ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document