MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY FOR AFFERENT LOOP SYNDROME

2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 91-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akio Ashida ◽  
Isao Tamura ◽  
Yutaka Kumagiri ◽  
Fumiyasu Fukano ◽  
Shinichiro Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography ◽  
Afferent Loop ◽  
Afferent Loop Syndrome

scholarly journals Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for afferent loop syndrome

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 591-592
Author(s):  
Kazuhide Takata ◽  
Akira Anan ◽  
Kaoru Umeda ◽  
Shotaro Sakisaka
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography ◽  
Afferent Loop ◽  
Afferent Loop Syndrome

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 28-30
Author(s):  
Tanita Suttichaimongkol
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma ◽  
Case Presentation ◽  
Duct Epithelium ◽  
Bile Duct Epithelium ◽  
High Degree

Cholangiocarcinoma is a primary biliary tract tumor arising from the bile duct epithelium. Classically, these tumors have been categorized according to their anatomic location as intrahepatic and extrahepatic. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma is the most common type of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. It is the most difficult cancer to diagnose and therefore carries a poor prognosis with a 5-year survivalrate of less than 10%. Diagnostic imaging, coupled with a high degree of clinical suspicion, play a critical role in timely diagnosis, staging, and evaluation for surgical resectability. The most common imagingmodalities used for diagnosis and staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma include ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRI/MRCP). This article showed a case presentation and reviewed the imaging appearance of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.   Figure 1  Greyscale sonography at the level of hepatic hilum revealed an ill-defined hilar mass (asterisk)resulting in upstream dilatation of right (arrow) and left (arrow head) main intrahepatic duct.  

scholarly journals Pancreatico‑pleural Fistula: Case Series

2018 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 026-031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manoj Munirathinam ◽  
Pugazhendhi Thangavelu ◽  
Ratnakar Kini
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Pleural Fluid ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography ◽  
Fluid Analysis ◽  
High Index Of Suspicion ◽  
Enhanced Computed Tomography ◽  
Acute And Chronic Pancreatitis ◽  
Pancreatic Pathology

ABSTRACTPancreatico‑pleural fistula is a rare but serious complication of acute and chronic pancreatitis. The pleural effusion caused by pancreatico‑pleural fistula is usually massive and recurrent. It is predominately left‑sided but right‑sided and bilateral effusion does occur. We report four cases of pancreatico‑pleural fistula admitted to our hospital. Their clinical presentation and management aspects are discussed. Two patients were managed by pancreatic endotherapy and two patients were managed conservatively. All four patients improved symptomatically and were discharged and are on regular follow‑up. Most of these patients would be evaluated for their breathlessness and pleural effusion delaying the diagnosis of pancreatic pathology and management. Hence, earlier recognition and prompt treatment would help the patients to recover from their illnesses. Pancreatic pleural fistula diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion in patients presenting with chest symptoms or pleural effusion. Extremely high pleural fluid amylase levels are usual but not universally present. A chest X‑ray, pleural fluid analysis, and abdominal imaging (magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography/magnetic resonance imaging abdomen more useful than contrast‑enhanced computed tomography abdomen) would clinch the diagnosis. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with stent or sphincterotomy should be considered when pancreatic duct (PD) reveals a stricture or when medical management fails in patients with dilated or irregular PD. Surgical intervention may be indicated in patients with complete disruption of PD or multiple strictures.

scholarly journals Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography for Detecting Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 383
Author(s):  
Kojiro Omiya ◽  
Kazuhiro Hiramatsu ◽  
Yoshihisa Shibata ◽  
Masahide Fukaya ◽  
Masahiro Fujii ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Signal Intensity ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography ◽  
Gallbladder Wall ◽  
High Signal ◽  
Mri Findings ◽  
Open Conversion ◽  
Preoperative Magnetic Resonance

Previous studies have shown that signal intensity variations in the gallbladder wall on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are associated with necrosis and fibrosis in the gallbladder of acute cholecystitis (AC). However, the association between MRI findings and operative outcomes remains unclear. We retrospectively identified 321 patients who underwent preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for AC. Based on the gallbladder wall signal intensity on MRI, these patients were divided into high signal intensity (HSI), intermediate signal intensity (ISI), and low signal intensity (LSI) groups. Comparisons of bailout procedure rates (open conversion and laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy) and operating times were performed. The recorded bailout procedure rates were 6.8% (7/103 cases), 26.7% (31/116 cases), and 40.2% (41/102 cases), and the median operating times were 95, 110, and 138 minutes in the HSI, ISI, and LSI groups, respectively (both p < 0.001). During the multivariate analysis, the LSI of the gallbladder wall was an independent predictor of both the bailout procedure (odds ratio [OR] 5.30; 95% CI 2.11–13.30; p < 0.001) and prolonged surgery (≥144 min) (OR 6.10, 95% CI 2.74–13.60, p < 0.001). Preoperative MRCP/MRI assessment could be a novel method for predicting surgical difficulty during LC for AC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document