Genitourinary small cell carcinoma: a retrospective review of treatment and survival patterns at The Ottawa Hospital Regional Cancer Center

2006 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 711-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
TIMOTHY R. ASMIS ◽  
M. NEIL REAUME ◽  
SIMONE DAHROUGE ◽  
SHAWN MALONE
2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thep CHALERMCHAI ◽  
Harit SUWANRUSME ◽  
Poonchavis CHANTRANUWAT ◽  
Narin VORAVUD ◽  
Virote SRIURANPONG

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Goutam Santosh Panda ◽  
Vanita Noronha ◽  
Subhash Yadav ◽  
Amit Joshi ◽  
Vijay Patil ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) is a rare and aggressive tumor with no established standard treatment.Methods: This is a retrospective study of adult patients with histologically proven SCCE registered between February 2011 and March 2020 at Tata Memorial Hospital in Mumbai.Results: There were 56 patients with 29(51.8%) having limited-stage disease (LD) and 27(48.2%) having extensive-stage disease (ED). The median age was 58(IQR 51-65) years, 57.1% were men, 40% were smokers. Amongst LD-SCCE patients, 23 underwent local therapy i.e. radiation (19, 65.5%), surgery (4, 13.8%) and 27 received chemotherapy in neoadjuvant (23, 79.3%), concurrent (18, 62.1%) and adjuvant (4,13.8%) settings. Total 19 ED-SCCE patients (70.4%) received chemotherapy. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was delivered to 11(37.9%) and 7(25.9%) patients with LD-SCCE and ED-SCCE, respectively. Significant grade ≥3 chemo-toxicities in patients with LD-SCCE and ED-SCCE included febrile neutropenia in 33.3% and 23.5%, anemia in 9.5% and 17.6%, and dyselectrolytemia in 14.3% and 11.8%, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) in LD-SCCE and ED-SCCE were 22.9 (95% CI 1.8-44.1) months and 11.8 (95% CI 7.3-16.4) months, respectively. Age <60years (p=0.004) and tumor epicenter in lower third esophagus (p=0.002) were good prognostic factors for OS in LD-SCCE and ED-SCCE patients respectively. The incidence of brain metastasis was low, both at presentation (1/27, 3.7%) and at relapse (5/56, 8.9%).Conclusion: Although the median overall survival of LD-SCCE is better than ED-SCCE, it is still under 2 years. Brain metastases are uncommon and PCI can be avoided with close clinico-radiological follow up.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Baoqing Chen ◽  
Han Yang ◽  
Huali Ma ◽  
Qiaoqiao Li ◽  
Bo Qiu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) is characterized by its progressive feature and poor prognosis. There is no consensus on a standard therapeutic modality for SCCE. In this study, we aimed to characterize the outcomes of primary SCCE patients treated by radiation therapy as part of treatment and investigate prognostic factors. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of 42 SCCE patients who were treated by RT as part of treatment at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from 2001 to 2014. The Kaplan-Meier and log-rank method were used to analyze survival. Cox’s hazard regression model was applied to determine prognostic factors. Results Of the 42 enrolled patients, 25 had limited disease (LD) and 17 with extensive disease (ED). The overall response rate (CR + PR) was 60.0% (21/35). The median overall survival time (OS) for whole and LD group were 12.9 and 36.8 months. The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates of the whole cohort were 64.9, 31.3, and 13.9%, respectively. OS was significantly longer in patients with ECOG performance score (ECOG PS) < 2 (p = 0.001), lesion length ≤ 5 cm (p = 0.001), and LD (p = 0.049). In the patients with LD, multivariate analysis indicated that combined with chemotherapy (P = 0.046) and higher radiation dose (P = 0.027) predicted better prognosis in OS. The overall rate of grade 3–4 toxicities in the whole cohort was 37.5%. In total, 65% (17/26) patients with recurrent disease died with the metastasis with or without the primary recurrence. Conclusion RT was one of the effective and safe treatments for locoregional control of SCCE. Lower ECOG PS score, shorter lesion length, treated with chemotherapy, and a higher dose of RT were identified as favorable independent prognostic factors.


2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4566-4566 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. P. Lynch ◽  
T. T. Vu ◽  
A. M. Kamat ◽  
H. B. Grossman ◽  
R. E. Millikan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document