Plasma pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of alfaxalone in neonatal foals after an intravenous bolus of alfaxalone following premedication with butorphanol tartrate

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 503-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy Goodwin ◽  
Helen Keates ◽  
Kirby Pasloske ◽  
Martin Pearson ◽  
Ben Sauer ◽  
...  
1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (01) ◽  
pp. 127-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dipti M Amin ◽  
Timothy G K Mant ◽  
Stephen M Walker ◽  
Roger Kerry ◽  
Peter Lloyd ◽  
...  

SummaryPlasma pharmacokinetics, effect on coagulation parameters, and safety and tolerability of an intravenous infusion of ™REVASC before, during and after a DDAVP infusion were investigated.Twelve healthy volunteers were given an intravenous bolus dose followed by a constant rate four-hour infusion of ™REVASC. Fifteen-minute infusions of 0.9% saline and DDAVP were started two and three hours respectively after the start of the ™REVASC infusion.Plasma ™REVASC concentrations were not affected by either the saline or DDAVP infusion. ™REVASC infusion produced an increase in APTT which plateaued between 0.5 and 3 hours. After the DDAVP infusion there was a tendency towards a new lower plateau whilst the ™REVASC infusion continued. There were no serious adverse events or bleeding episodes throughout the study.In conclusion, the co-administration of intravenous DDAVP has no effect on the plasma pharmacokinetics of ™REVASC and partially reverses the ™REVASC-induced increase in APTT. This may represent a role for DDAVP in the partial reversal of anticoagulation induced by ™REVASC.


1987 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony L Sintetos ◽  
James Hulse ◽  
Edward L C Pritchett

2006 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 229-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre J Ferré ◽  
Kirby Pasloske ◽  
Ted Whittem ◽  
Millagahamanda G Ranasinghe ◽  
Qiang Li ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Clements ◽  
Cristina Peterson ◽  
Kelley Kitto ◽  
George Wilcox ◽  
Carolyn Fairbanks

2007 ◽  
Vol 106 (5) ◽  
pp. 924-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kye-Min Kim ◽  
Byung-Moon Choi ◽  
Si-Won Park ◽  
Soo-Han Lee ◽  
Lane V. Christensen ◽  
...  

Background The aim of this trial was to evaluate the induction and recovery characteristics of microemulsion propofol (Aquafol; Daewon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea). Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety profile were investigated. Lipid emulsion propofol (Diprivan; AstraZeneca, London, United Kingdom) was used as a comparator. Methods Thirty-one healthy volunteers aged 20-79 yr were given an intravenous bolus of propofol 2 mg/kg, followed by variable rate infusion for 60 min. Each volunteer was studied twice with different formulations at an interval of 1 week. Arterial concentrations of propofol were measured, and Bispectral Index was used as a surrogate measure of propofol effect. The induction and recovery characteristics including bioequivalence were evaluated by noncompartmental analysis. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were investigated using a population approach with mixed effects modeling. The rate, severity, and causal relation of adverse events were analyzed. Results Both formulations were bioequivalent. The observed time to peak effect after a bolus of both formulations was 1.5 min. Plasma concentration of propofol at loss of consciousness, time to loss of consciousness after a bolus, and time to recovery of consciousness after discontinuation of infusion did not show significant differences. The population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics revealed a variety of differences between two formulations. Aquafol showed similar safety profile to Diprivan. Conclusions The efficacy and safety of Aquafol were not different from those of Diprivan within the dose range in this study.


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 229-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gee Youn Kim ◽  
Tania Ahuja ◽  
John Papadopoulos ◽  
Frank Cirrone

Carfilzomib is a second-generation proteasome inhibitor that irreversibly inhibits chymotrypsin-like (CT-L) activities of the proteasome, and is indicated for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Cardiotoxicity is a well-established adverse effect of carfilzomib. The extent of cardiac toxicity in the literature spans anywhere from palpitations to cardiac arrest, with the most commonly reported manifestation being new-onset or worsening heart failure. A pre-clinical study of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of carfilzomib given via intravenous bolus or 30-minute infusion in rats showed that carfilzomib can strongly induce apoptosis and potently damage cardiac myocytes at clinically relevant concentrations. Moreover, the mortality rate with the bolus administration was 44% whereas the same dose administered as a 30-minute infusion did not result in mortality. There remains limited clinical data regarding the safety of carfilzomib at doses of 27–56 mg/m2 based on infusion times as these doses have not been well studied. This retrospective review was conducted to evaluate the safety of carfilzomib at doses >27 mg/m2 at all infusion times.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (7S_Part_5) ◽  
pp. P250-P250
Author(s):  
Brian A. Willis ◽  
Lisa R. Ferguson-Sells ◽  
Laiyi Chua ◽  
Eric R. Siemers ◽  
Robert A. Dean ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 855.e11-855.e12
Author(s):  
H. Trenholme ◽  
A. Hanafi ◽  
R. Reed ◽  
D. Sakai ◽  
C. Ryan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document