scholarly journals Reverse Diffusion in US Multinationals: Barriers from the American Business System

2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 1261-1286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony Edwards ◽  
Phil Almond ◽  
Ian Clark ◽  
Trevor Colling ◽  
Anthony Ferner
1958 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 199
Author(s):  
F. Thistlethwaite ◽  
T. C. Cochran

1958 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 498
Author(s):  
Joe B. Frantz ◽  
Thomas C. Cochran

1958 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 109
Author(s):  
Oswald Knauth ◽  
Thomas C. Cochran

1959 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 407
Author(s):  
Eric E. Lampard ◽  
Thomas C. Cochran

1980 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 459-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard B. Du Boff

“The telegraph system in America is eminently characteristic of the national mind. At its very birth, it became the handmaiden of commerce.” So wrote the editor of a telegraph trade journal in 1853. Professor Du Boff describes an antebellum American business community that was as ready for a “revolution” in its size and structure as the dawning science of electricity was ready to make it happen. The result was the telegraph and its enthusiastic adoption in a few short years by a business system that quickly became national in scope and outlook. The railroad may ultimately have changed America even more than the telegraph but, as Du Boff shows, the railroad was originally conceived as a local and regional facility whereas the telegraph was interregional in its impact from its very beginnings.


1935 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 76-77
Author(s):  
Henrietta M. Larson

It is a curious fact that many American business men of the past are known more for their charities or philanthropies or for their cultural or political interests and activities than for the very significant work they may have done in business. The biographers of business men, with the exception of those who have deliberately set out to berate the man about whom they were writing, have generally had very little to say about their subject's business. It is as if business were something not worthy of record. It is well to remember that business is important not only because it makes profits for the individual or builds fortunes; it also has a wide social importance. As we have lately experienced, an active, successful business system very likely means greater social well-being; and a depressed business, widespread misery. In so far as the business man is responsible for one or the other, the responsibility should be recognized in studies of his life. Thus through the experience of others would be widened immeasurably our knowledge of how business functions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document