TRADING WITH THE WAITING-LIST: THE JUSTICE OF LIVING DONOR LIST EXCHANGE

Bioethics ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 190-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
GOVERT DEN HARTOGH
2014 ◽  
Vol 98 (9) ◽  
pp. 979-986 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Rodrigue ◽  
Matthew J. Paek ◽  
Ogo Egbuna ◽  
Amy D. Waterman ◽  
Jesse D. Schold ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 3580-3580 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. B. Kute ◽  
H. V. Patel ◽  
P. R. Shah ◽  
P. R. Modi ◽  
V. R. Shah ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 1550-1555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine M. Sullivan ◽  
Kitty V. Barnswell ◽  
Kate Greenway ◽  
Cindy M. Kamps ◽  
Derrick Wilson ◽  
...  

Background and objectivesMany patients with ESKD face barriers in completing the steps required to obtain a transplant. These eight sequential steps are medical suitability, interest in transplant, referral to a transplant center, first visit to center, transplant workup, successful candidate, waiting list or identify living donor, and receive transplant. This study sought to determine the effect of navigators on helping patients complete these steps.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsOur study was a cluster randomized, controlled trial involving 40 hemodialysis facilities and four transplant centers in Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2016. Four trained kidney transplant recipients met regularly with patients on hemodialysis at 20 intervention facilities, determined their step in the transplant process, and provided tailored information and assistance in completing that step and subsequent steps. Patients at 20 control facilities continued to receive usual care. Primary study outcomes were waiting list placement and receipt of a deceased or living donor transplant. An exploratory outcome was first visit to a transplant center.ResultsBefore the trial, intervention (1041 patients) and control (836 patients) groups were similar in the proportions of patients who made a first visit to a transplant center, were placed on a waiting list, and received a deceased or living donor transplant. At the end of the trial, intervention and control groups were also similar in first visit (16.1% versus 13.8%; difference, 2.3%; 95% confidence interval, −0.8% to 5.5%), waitlisting (16.3% versus 13.8%; difference, 2.5%; 95% confidence interval, −1.2% to 6.1%), deceased donor transplantation (2.8% versus 2.2%; difference, 0.6%; 95% confidence interval, −0.8% to 2.1%), and living donor transplantation (1.2% versus 1.0%; difference, 0.1%; 95% confidence interval, −0.9% to 1.1%).ConclusionsUse of trained kidney transplant recipients as navigators did not increase first visits to a transplant center, waiting list placement, and receipt of deceased or living donor transplants.


Author(s):  
Julie Hennessy

Dr. Juan Caicedo was educated in general medicine and surgery at Universidad Nacional de Colombia and practiced transplant medicine in Bogota. He determined that he would need to go to the United States to advance his training, and ultimately was awarded a fellowship in transplant surgery at Northwestern Memorial Hospital. During his three years as a fellow, Caicedo was struck by the number of Hispanic patients on the kidney transplant waiting list. Not only were Hispanics the highest growth group on the transplant waiting list, they also waited longer for transplants and died while waiting at higher rates than non-Hispanic whites or African-Americans. Caicedo also was alarmed by Hispanic patients' lower utilization of living donors for transplantation they were underrepresented not only as live donor transplant patients, but also as donors. As he neared the end of his fellowship in 2006, Caicedo wondered if the Hispanic population encountered unique barriers to transplantation and living donor usage, and began to think about creating a program to address these barriers.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hany Said Abd Elbaset ◽  
◽  
Ahmad Mohammad Sultan ◽  
Iman Fawzy Montasser ◽  
Hossam E. M. Soliman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic may negatively impact the care of liver transplant candidates and recipients. Main body of the abstract Accordingly, each country must have its national guidelines based on the current situation and according to available tools. Liver Transplantation Scientific Committee of Waiting List Project in Egypt was established in 13 April 2020. One of the major objectives of this Scientific Committee is the preparation of national protocol for Transplant Centers in Egypt to deal with living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Conclusions The protocol highlights basic hospital requirements for LDLT during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the patient selection from the waiting list, management of patients on the waiting list, and post-transplant management.


2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A77-A77
Author(s):  
D DELPHINE ◽  
F AGNESE ◽  
B NADINE ◽  
L OLIVIER ◽  
L HUBERT ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document