Bank Loan Officers' Perceptions of Business Owners: The Role of Gender

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 154-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Wilson ◽  
Sara Carter ◽  
Stephen Tagg ◽  
Eleanor Shaw ◽  
Wing Lam
2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan Lowe

<span>The expectation gap, and its related effects on auditor legal liability, has been presumed to be caused by diverging perceptions by the auditing profession and third party litigants regarding the professions role, responsibilities, and related performance. Prior research regarding the expectation gap has focused on diverging perceptions of different groups (i.e. financial analysts, bank loan officers, small business owners, and auditors). While this research has identified an expectation gap between auditors and certain third-parties, it has neglected examining the perceptions of judicial litigants. This absence is somewhat ironic given the current auditor legal liability situation. This study fills this void by comparing judges and auditors attitudes toward the auditing profession. Results revealed a large divergence in perceptions of auditors and judges regarding their expectations of the auditing profession.</span>


2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
J. David Diltz ◽  
Mark E. Bayless

This paper presents the results of an experimental study in which commercial bank loan officers evaluated a hypothetical ongoing firm for a line of credit, and independently, a term loan. Statistical analysis revealed significant influences on the loan decision resulting from bank size, national charter, urban location, loan officer age, years of experience, and prior experience with capital lease transactions.


2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia L. F. Schleifer ◽  
Randolph A. Shockley

The extensive body of literature and research concerning auditor independence, the so-called cornerstone of the profession, has centered mainly on alleged threats to perceived independence or threats to actual independence. The objective of this study was to investigate accountants and financial statement users reactions to policies designed to enhance auditor independence. Multidimensional scaling techniques were used to measure the similarity or dissimilarity of the views of four separate groups: Big Eight auditors; non-Big Eight CPAs, bank loan officers, and certified financial analysis. Results showed that the four groups differed significantly in the extent of their support of fourteen policies discussed in the Cohen Communication Report as means to enhance auditor independence. The Cohen Commissions position on these policies was found to appear to be more aligned with financial statement users.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document