Social Information Processing, Moral Reasoning, and Emotion Attributions: Relations With Adolescents’ Reactive and Proactive Aggression

2009 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 1739-1755 ◽  
Author(s):  
William F. Arsenio ◽  
Erin Adams ◽  
Jason Gold
Keyword(s):  
Information Processing ◽  
Moral Reasoning ◽  
Social Information Processing ◽  
Social Information ◽  
Proactive Aggression ◽  
Reactive And Proactive Aggression

scholarly journals Social Information Processing and Reactive and Proactive Aggression among Children with ADHD

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ahmed Hammad ◽  
Huda Shaaban Muhammad Awed
Keyword(s):  
Information Processing ◽  
Social Information Processing ◽  
Social Information ◽  
Proactive Aggression ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Children With Adhd ◽  
The Social ◽  
Reactive And Proactive Aggression ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Selective Information Processing

<p>This study examined the social information processing qualities among children with reactive and proactive aggression among children with Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder (ADHD). It enrolled a total of 112 Saudi school children (62 boys, 50 girls; mean age = 9.26 years, SD = 1.98) of which 51 were diagnosed with ADHD and 61 typically developing peers. Data on children’s social informational processing and type of aggression displayed were gathered and analyzed for group differences by diagnosis and gender within diagnosis. Findings suggest gaps in social information processing and elevated aggression levels among children with ADHD compared to typical others. Male children with ADHD to present mostly with proactive aggression and self-serving information processing. Female ADHD were characterized by reactive aggression and selective information processing. Implicit socialization processes might explain the differences in social information processing and type of aggression among male and female students with Arabic culture background.</p><p><br /><strong></strong></p>

The dyadic nature of social information processing in boys' reactive and proactive aggression.

2001 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 268-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie A. Hubbard ◽  
Kenneth A. Dodge ◽  
Antonius H. N. Cillessen ◽  
John D. Coie ◽  
David Schwartz
Keyword(s):  
Information Processing ◽  
Social Information Processing ◽  
Social Information ◽  
Proactive Aggression ◽  
Reactive And Proactive Aggression

Cognitive Schemas and Aggressive Behavior in Adolescents: The Mediating Role of Social Information Processing

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 190-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Calvete ◽  
Izaskun Orue
Keyword(s):  
Information Processing ◽  
Aggressive Behavior ◽  
Social Information Processing ◽  
Social Information ◽  
Reactive Aggression ◽  
Proactive Aggression ◽  
Cognitive Schemas ◽  
Mediating Role ◽  
Selection Of

This study assesses the association between cognitive schemas of justification of violence, grandiosity and abuse, and reactive and proactive aggressive behavior, and whether this association is mediated by social information processing (SIP). For this purpose, a sample of 1371 adolescents (638 girls and 580 boys) completed measures of cognitive schemas, SIP, and Reactive-Proactive Aggression. The results showed that the cognitive schemas of justification of violence and narcissism are more relevant for proactive aggression, whereas the abuse schema is more relevant for reactive aggression. SIP mediated particularly the association between cognitive schemas and reactive aggression. Each cognitive schema was shown to be associated with some particular SIP component: justification of violence and abuse with the component of interpretation, and narcissism with the experience of anger. Moreover, the abuse schema was negatively associated with the selection of aggressive responses. Lastly, a general model of paths between schemas, SIP, and aggression was found to be quite similar for boys and girls, although the former scored higher in proactive aggression, partly because of their higher scores in the justification of violence and narcissism schemas.

Relational Aggression and Response Decision Biases in Social Information Processing in Australian Adolescent Females

2008 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna M. Jenkins ◽  
Janet Fletcher
Keyword(s):  
Information Processing ◽  
Moral Reasoning ◽  
Relational Aggression ◽  
Social Information Processing ◽  
Response Selection ◽  
Social Information ◽  
Efficacy Evaluation ◽  
Information Processing Model ◽  
Relationally Aggressive ◽  
Response Decision

AbstractRelational aggression is becoming increasingly recognized as a very prevalent behaviour amongst females, especially within school settings. Robust findings have supported N.R Crick and K.A. Dodge's Social Information Processing Model (1994) as being a useful model in explaining physical aggression amongst males. However, little research has examined the model with regards to relational aggression in females and research that does exist has shown inconsistent findings. The current study examined the fifth step of the model, Response Decision, in a sample of female adolescents. The four factors that have previously been identified as contributing to the response decision step were examined, including response evaluation, outcome expectancies, self-efficacy evaluation, and response selection. In view of suggestions made by W.F.Arsenio and E.A.Lemerise (2004), level of moral reasoning was also examined with regard to how relationally aggressive responses were evaluated. These factors were examined within hypothetical relationally aggressive peer situations in relationally aggressive, overtly aggressive, relationally plus overtly aggressive and non-aggressive participants. The results show that compared to non-aggressive and overtly aggressive females, relationally aggressive females show a bias in the four processes of the response decision step. Differences in levels of moral reasoning were also found between the different aggression type groups. Hence the findings provide support for Crick and Dodge's (1994) Social Information Processing model in explaining relationally aggressive behaviour. The findings are discussed with regards to their implications for educational settings.

Hostility and Perceptions of Support in Ambiguous Social Interactions

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana-Maria Vranceanu ◽  
Linda C. Gallo ◽  
Laura M. Bogart
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Social Networks ◽  
Information Processing ◽  
Social Interactions ◽  
Social Information Processing ◽  
Perceived Social Support ◽  
Social Information ◽  
Inverse Association ◽  
Processing Bias ◽  
Information Processing Bias

The present study investigated whether a social information processing bias contributes to the inverse association between trait hostility and perceived social support. A sample of 104 undergraduates (50 men) completed a measure of hostility and rated videotaped interactions in which a speaker disclosed a problem while a listener reacted ambiguously. Results showed that hostile persons rated listeners as less friendly and socially supportive across six conversations, although the nature of the hostility effect varied by sex, target rated, and manner in which support was assessed. Hostility and target interactively impacted ratings of support and affiliation only for men. At least in part, a social information processing bias could contribute to hostile persons' perceptions of their social networks.

Social information processing of children with Neurofibromatosis Type 1

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan M. Kurss ◽  
Anna E. Craig ◽  
Jennifer Reiter-Purtill ◽  
Kathryn Vannatta ◽  
Cynthia Gerhardt
Keyword(s):  
Information Processing ◽  
Neurofibromatosis Type 1 ◽  
Social Information Processing ◽  
Social Information ◽  
Neurofibromatosis Type
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document