scholarly journals Tuition Fees and the Dual Income Tax: The Optimality of the Nordic Income Tax System Reconsidered

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Schindler

Abstract We examine the optimal tax and education policy in the case of a dual income tax. Incorporating an educational sector and endogenous capital taxation, we show that the results in Nielsen and Sørensen’s study are vulnerable with respect to assumptions on the elasticity of unskilled labor supply. Tax progressivity results residually, whereas educational policy guarantees an optimal tax wedge on, but not necessarily efficiency in, educational investment. The less elastic are the unobservable educational investment and skilled labor (the latter relative to unskilled labor supply), and the more educational policy cares about the skilled labor supply, the more progressive the tax system will be. Education will be subsidized on a net basis if the complementarity effect on the skilled labor supply is strong and important; however, there is also an offsetting substitutability effect of the unskilled labor supply at play.

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 625-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erlend E. Bø ◽  
Peter J. Lambert ◽  
Thor O. Thoresen

2010 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thor O. Thoresen ◽  
Annette Alstadsaeter

1976 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-15
Author(s):  
Eitan Berglas

Recent studies find wage subsidies (WS) to be superior to negative income tax (NIT). However, these studies suffer from a serious aggregation problem. A model is suggested in which these aggregation problems are avoided. In this model there exists a WS schedule that increases labor supply compared with an equally costly NIT. However, the WS may be Pareto inferior. Furthermore, for high income workers given any income tax system it is always possible to find a wage tax system which both is Pareto superior and increases labor supply. The merits of the model and its implications for other optimal income tax studies are critically discussed.


Public Choice ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 145 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 25-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven-Olov Daunfeldt ◽  
Ulrika Praski-Ståhlgren ◽  
Niklas Rudholm

2009 ◽  
Vol 229 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Wagenhals ◽  
Jürgen Buck

SummaryExisting quantitative studies on the impact of a dual income tax on the German economy usually are based on computable general equilibrium models. They assume one representative household. Their results are sensitive to one behavioral parameter, the labor supply elasticity, which is assumed to be given exogenously. This paper presents a microeconometric evaluation of the labor supply and distribution effects of a dual income tax in Germany based on a representative sample of the German population.We observe small positive effects on labor supply and a small increase in economic inequality.


Author(s):  
Peter J. Lambert ◽  
Thor O. Thoresen

Abstract A dual income tax system, combining progressive taxation of labor income with proportional taxation of income from capital, may or may not be unambiguously inequality reducing. Examples show that the degree of correlation between the distributions of wage and capital income, the degree of tax rate differentiation in the DIT, and reranking of tax-payers can be expected to complicate a clear-cut analysis. We trace out what can be said definitively, obtaining sufficient conditions for unambiguous inequality reduction in certain cases, and more generally identifying the nature of the implicit redistribution between labor and capital income components which is sufficient to ensure overall inequality reduction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document