Scientific Uncertainty in News Coverage of Cancer Research: Effects of Hedging on Scientists and Journalists Credibility

2008 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob D. Jensen
2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 597-623
Author(s):  
Chelsea L. Ratcliff

This study provides an in-depth analysis of how scientific uncertainty was conveyed along the dissemination pathway for a novel discovery linking genomic markers to depression risk. In this article, knowledge limitations described in the original scientific paper were mostly omitted from press releases, and a majority of news coverage mirrored press release content. However, the affiliated scientists depicted uncertainty to different degrees, appearing to influence the tenor of each institution’s press release and the news reports for which they were interviewed or quoted. News reports sometimes conveyed more caveats than the original scientific report. This case study presents detailed examples of uncertainty representations in the emerging domain of precision medicine, organized by a typology to guide future research.


2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 486-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob D. Jensen ◽  
Nick Carcioppolo ◽  
Andy J. King ◽  
Jennifer K. Bernat ◽  
LaShara Davis ◽  
...  

1949 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 700-701
Author(s):  
W.C.A.
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Magdalena Obermaier ◽  
Thomas Koch ◽  
Christian Baden

Abstract. Opinion polls are a well-established part of political news coverage, especially during election campaigns. At the same time, there has been controversial debate over the possible influences of such polls on voters’ electoral choices. The most prominent influence discussed is the bandwagon effect: It states that voters tend to support the expected winner of an upcoming election, and use polls to determine who the likely winner will be. This study investigated the mechanisms underlying the effect. In addition, we inquired into the role of past electoral performances of a candidate and analyzed how these (as well as polls) are used as heuristic cues for the assessment of a candidate’s personal characteristics. Using an experimental design, we found that both polls and past election results influence participants’ expectations regarding which candidate will succeed. Moreover, higher competence was attributed to a candidate, if recipients believe that the majority of voters favor that candidate. Through this attribution of competence, both information about prior elections and current polls shaped voters’ electoral preferences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document