Estimating Activity Duration by Momentary Time-Sampling of Part or All of the Day

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 489-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Mansell ◽  
Julie Beadle-Brown
Keyword(s):  
Time Sampling ◽  
Momentary Time Sampling ◽  
Activity Duration

Perceptions of Using Sit-to-Stand Desks in a Middle School Classroom

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Erwin ◽  
Aaron Beighle ◽  
Ash Routen ◽  
Ben Montemayor
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Middle School ◽  
Time Sampling ◽  
Learning Behaviors ◽  
Momentary Time Sampling ◽  
Sit To Stand ◽  
Behavioral Observations ◽  
School Classroom

The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of sit-to-stand desks in a middle school classroom. Participants used sit-to-stand desks during health class. Momentary time sampling was used for physical activity and behavioral observations. Results indicate students sat 37%, stood 59%, and walked 4% of the time. Misbehaviors occurred 4% of the observed period. The following themes emerged: focus, freedom, distractions, and design. Sit-to-stand desks appear to encourage standing during instruction while simultaneously limiting misbehaviors. Students indicated some distractions but were generally positive toward desk implementation and suggested they supported learning behaviors. The teacher echoed most of the student themes.

The Use of Momentary Time Sampling and Partial Interval Recording in Behavioural Research

1990 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Harrop ◽  
Michael Daniels ◽  
Christine Foulkes
Keyword(s):  
Computer Simulation ◽  
Behaviour Change ◽  
Sampling Techniques ◽  
Time Sampling ◽  
Momentary Time Sampling ◽  
Mode Of Operation ◽  
Behavioural Research ◽  
Partial Interval ◽  
Interval Recording ◽  
Absolute Duration

The inherent properties of momentary time sampling (MTS) and partial interval recording (PIR) are examined. Findings derived from computer simulation investigations are discussed in terms of the mode of operation of the two time-sampling techniques. It is seen that the advantage of MTS is that it can, under certain restricted circumstances, estimate absolute duration of behaviour occurring. The important disadvantage of MTS is that it is relatively insensitive when estimating degree of change of behaviour. In contrast, although PIR cannot accurately measure absolute duration it is more sensitive to behaviour change than is MTS. It is concluded that the practitioner who wishes to use one of these methods of time sampling must carefully consider the aims and possible effects of the investigation before deciding which method to use.

scholarly journals A COMPARISON OF MOMENTARY TIME SAMPLING AND PARTIAL-INTERVAL RECORDING FOR EVALUATING FUNCTIONAL RELATIONS

2007 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 501-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maeve G. Meany-Daboul ◽  
Eileen M. Roscoe ◽  
Jason C. Bourret ◽  
William H. Ahearn
Keyword(s):  
Time Sampling ◽  
Momentary Time Sampling ◽  
Functional Relations ◽  
Partial Interval ◽  
Interval Recording
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document