Is adjuvant therapy necessary for Stage IA and IB uterine papillary serous carcinoma and clear cell carcinoma after surgical staging?

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 820-824 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.S. KWON ◽  
J. ABRAMS ◽  
A. SUGIMOTO ◽  
M.S. CAREY
2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 720-729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian C. Hong ◽  
Jonathan Foote ◽  
Gloria Broadwater ◽  
Stéphanie Gaillard ◽  
Laura J. Havrilesky ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to assess interaction of lymph node dissection (LND), adjuvant chemotherapy (CT), and radiotherapy (RT) in stage I uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) and uterine clear cell carcinoma (UCC).Methods/MaterialsThe National Cancer Data Base was queried for women diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I UPSC and UCC from 1998 to 2012. Overall survival (OS) was estimated for combinations of RT and CT by the Kaplan-Meier method stratified by histology and LND. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were generated.ResultsUterine papillary serous carcinoma: 5432 women with UPSC were identified. Uterine papillary serous carcinoma had the highest 5-year OS with CT + RT with (83%) or without LND (76%). On multivariate analyses, CT [hazard ratio (HR), 0.77; P = 0.01] and vaginal cuff brachytherapy (HR, 0.68; P = 0.003) with LND were independently associated with OS. Without LND, vaginal cuff brachytherapy (HR, 0.53; P = 0.03), but not CT (HR, 1.21; P = 0.92), was associated with OS. Uterine clear cell carcinoma: 2516 women with UCC were identified. Uterine clear cell carcinoma with and without LND had comparable 5-year OS for all combinations of CT and RT on univariate and multivariate analyses.ConclusionsIn stage I papillary serous uterine cancer, brachytherapy and CT were associated with increased survival; however, the benefit of chemotherapy was limited to those with surgical staging. In contrast, no adjuvant therapy was associated with survival in stage I uterine clear cell carcinoma, and further investigation to identify more effective therapies is warranted.


2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 1143-1149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mika Mizuno ◽  
Hiroaki Kajiyama ◽  
Kiyosumi Shibata ◽  
Kimio Mizuno ◽  
Osamu Yamamuro ◽  
...  

BackgroundIt is controversial whether patients with stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) benefit from postoperative chemotherapy. This study was designed to evaluate the postoperative outcomes associated with the inclusion or exclusion of adjuvant therapy in these patients.MethodsA total of 185 patients who were treated for stage I CCC between 1991 and 2007 were retrospectively evaluated. All of the patients had received comprehensive surgical staging, and their condition had been diagnosed by a central pathological review system. Only one patient with stage IB was excluded from this study.ResultsMedian follow-up time was 62 months (range 7–191 months). Median age was 52 years (30–75 years). There were 41, 93, and 50 patients in stage IA, intraoperative capsule ruptured IC (rupture-IC), and all other-IC groups, respectively. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates for the substage were 97.6%, 87.8%, and 70.4% (P < 0.001), respectively. Among 134 patients consisting of those in the stage IA and rupture-IC groups, 91 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) and 43 patients did not (non-AC). There was no significant survival difference in each substage group between the non-AC and AC groups in 5-year recurrence-free survival rate (stage IA, 100% vs 93.8%; rupture-IC, 94.1% vs 86.6%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that there was no significant prognostic factor for both recurrence and survival among the IA and rupture-IC groups. Postoperative therapy, regimen, and chemotherapy cycles were not significantly affected.ConclusionsThis study indicates that adjuvant chemotherapy does not contribute to the improving prognosis of stage IA ovarian CCC. Whereas the histological type is CCC, the routine adjuvant chemotherapy after comprehensive surgical staging may be unnecessary for patients with at least stage IA.


Brachytherapy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minsi Zhang ◽  
T. Jonathan Yang ◽  
Neil B. Desai ◽  
Deborah DeLair ◽  
Marisa A. Kollmeier ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 1545-1549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Miao ◽  
Bin Cai ◽  
Ling Liu ◽  
Yixia Yang ◽  
Xiaoping Wan

Objective:To investigate the genes that were differentially expressed between clear cell carcinoma (CCC) and serous carcinoma (SAC) of the ovary with complementary DNA microarray.Methods:Complementary DNA microarray was carried out in 8 CCCs and 8 SACs of the ovary. Differentially expressed genes were identified and verified by real-time polymerase chain reaction. The expression of the protein was also verified with immunohistochemistry and Western blot in cells and tissues of ovarian CCC.Results:Comparison of the gene expression profiling identified 21 genes with more than 2-fold different expression between CCC and SAC of the ovary. The up-regulated and down-regulated genes were 9 and 12, respectively. The verification of Annexin IV in the cell line and tissues was in accordance with the result of the microarray.Conclusions:The complementary DNA microarray technique is a feasible way to explore the difference of the gene expression profiling between the 2 types of ovarian carcinoma. The overexpression of Annexin IV may be an ovarian CCC-specific molecular marker.Abbreviations:CCC- clear cell carcinoma, SAC- serous carcinoma, PCR- polymerase chain reaction, RT-PCR- reverse transcriptase PCR, ABCF2- ATP-binding cassette, sub-family F- member 2, HNF-1b- hepatocyte nuclear factor 1β


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document