Coronary Artery Dissection With Rupture of Aortic Valve Commissure Following Type A Aortic Dissection: The Role of 64-Slice MDCT

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 548-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.M. Das ◽  
Sayed M. Abdou ◽  
El Menyar Ayman ◽  
A.A. Khulaifi ◽  
A.L. Nabti AD
2009 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sun Hee Park ◽  
Hun Sik Park ◽  
Jang Hoon Lee ◽  
Hyeon Min Ryu ◽  
Jae Hee Kim ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuyuki Kato ◽  
Kenichi Sasaki ◽  
Hidetaka Yamauchi ◽  
Yasuyuki Kanno ◽  
Taiyo Jinno ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVES To investigate the early and mid-term results of aortic root remodelling with external ring annuloplasty in acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS From January 2015 to April 2019, a total of 194 patients underwent emergency or urgent operation for acute type A aortic dissection in our hospital. Of these, outcomes in 18 patients who underwent valve-sparing aortic root remodelling with external ring annuloplasty were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS The mean age of the 18 patients was 49 ± 14 years. Fourteen patients (78%) were men. Five patients had Marfan syndrome and 2 patients had bicuspid aortic valve. Two patients had coronary malperfusion and 1 patient had cerebral malperfusion. All 18 patients underwent aortic root remodelling with external ring annuloplasty. Cusp repair using central cusp plication was required in 9 patients. Concomitant procedures were hemiarch replacement in 8 patients, total arch replacement in 7 patients, partial arch replacement in 1 patient and coronary artery bypass grafting to the right coronary artery in 3 patients. Thirty-day mortality rate was 5.6% (1 of 18). Postoperative echocardiography showed aortic regurgitation of <1+ in all patients. During follow-up (mean 56 ± 41 months), 1 case of recurrent aortic regurgitation required aortic valve replacement. CONCLUSIONS Aortic root remodelling with external ring annuloplasty may be an appropriate treatment in middle-aged or younger patients presenting with acute type A aortic dissection.


Author(s):  
Athanasia Makrygianni ◽  
Filippos - Paschalis Rorris ◽  
Lydia Kokotsaki ◽  
Konstantinos Velissarios ◽  
Mohammad Salmasi ◽  
...  

Type A aortic dissection after percutaneous coronary intervention is a rare and life-threatening situation. The reported incidence ranges from 0,02% to 0,6% of all diagnostic and interventional percutaneous procedures. We describe a case of aortic dissection after percutaneous coronary intervention in a patient with acute myocardial infarction from spontaneous coronary artery dissection. The patient was initially treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention of the affected left coronary artery branches and left main coronary artery. Conservative management for the aortic dissection proved inadequate due to increasing diameter of the false lumen and the patient was referred to our cardiovascular unit for definite surgical management.


2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 196
Author(s):  
Erhan Kaya ◽  
Halit Yerebakan ◽  
Daniel Spielman ◽  
Omer Isik ◽  
Cevat Yakut

Occlusion of a coronary artery by an acute type A aortic dissection presents a life-threatening emergency that is rarely seen and easy to misdiagnose. We present the case of a 75-year-old male who experienced sudden onset of severe left-sided chest pain due to an acute type A aortic dissection that obstructed the right coronary artery. Following an initial misdiagnosis of acute coronary syndrome, imaging revealed the presence of an aortic dissection. An emergency modified Bentall procedure was performed, in which the damaged aorta and aortic valve were replaced.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (04) ◽  
pp. 331-334
Author(s):  
Paolo Masiello ◽  
Rocco Leone ◽  
Rossella Maria Benvenga ◽  
Severino Iesu

Abstract Background Type A aortic dissection is an emergency with high morbidity and mortality when surgery is not performed. Few cases are described in the literature about aortic dissection during pregnancy. A correlation between pregnancy and aortic dissection is mainly reported in patients with family history and connective tissue disorders, such as Marfan’s syndrome (MS), Loeys–Dietz’s syndrome, and Ehlers–Danlos’s syndromes, and patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV); exceptional cases are also described in patients without risk factors. Case presentation A 22-year-old young woman with MS, ascending aorta dilation, and BAV became pregnant. During labor, she experienced a short-term chest pain with spontaneous resolution. The electrocardiogram (ECG) and cardiac biomarkers were negative for acute coronary artery disease, but no transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) was performed. A caesarean section was performed without complications. After 1 month, a routine TTE showed a chronic ascending aortic dissection involving the aortic arch and supra-aortic vessels. Due to a normally functioning aortic valve, the David operation was performed (sparing aortic valve) with the replacement of the aortic arch and supra-aortic vessels. Conclusions Aortic dissection is a rare cardiovascular complication that can occur during pregnancy and is associated with very high-risk mortality. We have reported a rare case of undiagnosed type A aortic dissection involving the aortic arch during unplanned pregnancy in patients with BAV and MS, subsequently treated with the David surgery and replacement of ascending aortic arch and supra-aortic vessels. A closer clinical and instrumental follow-up is necessary in this particular group of patients at risk. Awareness of all physicians involved is mandatory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document