scholarly journals Long-term care assisting: Aged care and disability

2008 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-54
Author(s):  
Karen Teshuva
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 744-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Kane ◽  
Kay de Vries

Background: The concept of dignity is recognised as a fundamental right in many countries. It is embedded into law, human rights legislation and is often visible in organisations’ philosophy of care, particularly in aged care. Yet, many authors describe difficulties in defining dignity and how it can be preserved for people living in long term care. Objectives: In this article, Nordenfelt’s ‘four notions of dignity’ are considered, drawing on research literature addressing the different perspectives of those who receive, observe or deliver care in the context of the long-term care environment. Methods: A review of the literature was undertaken using the terms ‘nursing homes’, ‘residential care’ or ‘long-term care’. The terms were combined and the term ‘human dignity’ was added. A total of 29 articles met the inclusion criteria from the United Kingdom (14), United States (2), Australia (1), Sweden (3), Hong Kong (2), Norway (3), Nordic (1), Taiwan (1), Netherlands (1). Ethical Considerations: Every effort has been made to ensure an unbiased search of the literature with the intention of an accurate interpretation of findings. Discussion: The four notions of dignity outlined by Nordenfelt provide a comprehensive description of the concept of dignity which can be linked to the experiences of people living in long-term care today and provide a useful means of contextualising the experiences of older people, their families and significant others and also of staff in long-term care facilities. Of particular interest are the similarities of perspectives of dignity between these groups. The preservation of dignity implies that dignity is a quality inherent in us all. This links directly to the exploration and conclusions drawn from the literature review. Conversely, promoting dignity implies that dignity is something that can be influenced by others and external factors. Hence, there are a number of implications for practice. Conclusion: We suggest that two of Nordenfelt’s notions, ‘dignity of identity’ and ‘dignity of Menschenwüde’, are a common thread for residents, family members and staff when conceptualising dignity within long-term care environments.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-30
Author(s):  
Yu Fu ◽  
Michael Sherris ◽  
Mengyi Xu

Abstract China and the US are two contrasting countries in terms of functional disability and long-term care. China is experiencing declining family support for long-term care and developing private long-term care insurance. The US has a more developed public aged care system and private long-term care insurance market than China. Changes in the demand for long-term care are driven by the levels, trends and uncertainty in mortality and functional disability. To understand the future potential demand for long-term care, we compare mortality and functional disability experiences in China and the US, using a multi-state latent factor intensity model with time trends and systematic uncertainty in transition rates. We estimate the model with the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) and the US Health and Retirement Study (HRS) data. The estimation results show that if trends continue, both countries will experience longevity improvement with morbidity compression and a declining proportion of the older population with functional disability. Although the elderly Chinese have a shorter estimated life expectancy, they are expected to spend a smaller proportion of their future lifetime functionally disabled than the elderly Americans. Systematic uncertainty is shown to be significant in future trends in disability rates and our model estimates higher uncertainty in trends for the Chinese elderly, especially for urban residents.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 408-412
Author(s):  
Madison Blagrove

As America works towards more inclusive practices in aged care, we are learning more about how racial and ethnic disparities affect this sector. Furthermore, research has allowed for a more complete understanding of how wealth disparities along racial lines re-enforce gaps in access to care. A 2017 report from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System illustrates this clearly. It finds that the mean net worth of White Americans was $933,700, compared to the $138,200 mean net worth of Black Americans. These numbers include adults over age 65 and the families that may assist them in covering their health expenses. Thus, these wealth disparities have profound implications in access to long-term care.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 408-412
Author(s):  
Madison Blagrove

As America works towards more inclusive practices in aged care, we are learning more about how racial and ethnic disparities affect this sector. Furthermore, research has allowed for a more complete understanding of how wealth disparities along racial lines re-enforce gaps in access to care. A 2017 report from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System illustrates this clearly. It finds that the mean net worth of White Americans was $933,700, compared to the $138,200 mean net worth of Black Americans. These numbers include adults over age 65 and the families that may assist them in covering their health expenses. Thus, these wealth disparities have profound implications in access to long-term care.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. e0204342
Author(s):  
Marijan Jukic ◽  
Jeromey B. Temple
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 419-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet K. Sluggett ◽  
Stephanie L. Harrison ◽  
Leona A. Ritchie ◽  
Alexander J. Clough ◽  
Debbie Rigby ◽  
...  

Older residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs), also known as nursing homes, care homes, or residential aged care facilities, often have multiple health conditions and are exposed to polypharmacy. Use of high-risk medications such as opioids, glucose-lowering medications, antithrombotics, and antipsychotics is prevalent among residents of LTCFs. Ensuring appropriate use of high-risk medications is important to minimize the risk of medication-related harm in this vulnerable population. This paper provides an overview of the prevalence and factors associated with high-risk medication use among residents of LTCFs. Evidencebased strategies to optimize the use of high-risk medications and enhance resident outcomes are also discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 419-433
Author(s):  
Janet K. Sluggett ◽  
Stephanie L. Harrison ◽  
Leona A. Ritchie ◽  
Alexander J. Clough ◽  
Debbie Rigby ◽  
...  

Older residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs), also known as nursing homes, care homes, or residential aged care facilities, often have multiple health conditions and are exposed to polypharmacy. Use of high-risk medications such as opioids, glucose-lowering medications, antithrombotics, and antipsychotics is prevalent among residents of LTCFs. Ensuring appropriate use of high-risk medications is important to minimize the risk of medication-related harm in this vulnerable population. This paper provides an overview of the prevalence and factors associated with high-risk medication use among residents of LTCFs. Evidencebased strategies to optimize the use of high-risk medications and enhance resident outcomes are also discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document