scholarly journals The Critical Need for Academic Health Centers to Assess the Training, Support, and Career Development Requirements of Clinical Research Coordinators: Recommendations from the Clinical and Translational Science Award Research Coordinator Taskforce*

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 470-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa A. Speicher ◽  
Gregg Fromell ◽  
Sue Avery ◽  
Donna Brassil ◽  
Lori Carlson ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 08 (03) ◽  
pp. 845-853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abu Mosa ◽  
Kate Fultz-Hollis ◽  
Umberto Tachinardi ◽  
William Barnett ◽  
L. Nelson Sanchez-Pinto ◽  
...  

Summary Background: The role of the Chief Research Informatics Officer (CRIO) is emerging in academic health centers to address the challenges clinical researchers face in the increasingly digitalized, data-intensive healthcare system. Most current CRIOs are the first officers in their institutions to hold that role. To date there is very little published information about this role and the individuals who serve it. Objective: To increase our understanding of the CRIO role, the leaders who serve it, and the factors associated with their success in their organizations. Methods: The Clinical Research Informatics Working Group of the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) conducted a national survey of CRIOs in the United States and convened an expert panel of CRIOs to discuss their experience during the 2016 AMIA Annual Symposium. Results: CRIOs come from diverse academic backgrounds. Most have advance training and extensive experience in biomedical informatics but the majority have been CRIOs for less than three years. CRIOs identify funding, data governance, and advancing data analytics as their major challenges. Conclusion: CRIOs play an important role in helping shape the future of clinical research, innovation, and data analytics in healthcare in their organizations. They share many of the same challenges and see the same opportunities for the future of the field. Better understanding the background and experience of current CRIOs can help define and develop the role in other organizations and enhance their influence in the field of research informatics.Citation: Sanchez-Pinto LN, Mosa ASM, Fultz-Hollis K, Tachinardi U, Barnett WK, Embi PJ. The Emerging Role of the Chief Research Informatics Officer in Academic Health Centers. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8: 845–853 https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2017-04-RA-0062


2001 ◽  
Vol 76 (7) ◽  
pp. 700-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Oinonen ◽  
William F. Crowley ◽  
Jay Moskowitz ◽  
Peter H. Vlasses

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 376-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zainab Abedin ◽  
Tahilia J. Rebello ◽  
Boyd F. Richards ◽  
Harold Alan Pincus

2021 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 1050-1055
Author(s):  
Blair Holbein ◽  
Marie T Rape ◽  
Barbara N Hammack ◽  
Ann Melvin ◽  
Carson Reider ◽  
...  

Data and Safety Monitoring Boards (DSMBs) derived from the need to monitor large federally funded multi-center clinical trials and evolved to include commercial and other large and complex trials. Eventually, academic health centers also created institutionally focused trial monitoring mechanisms. The basic general principles that define traditional DSMBs extend to the institutional level. The primary responsibilities are assuring safety of the participants, preserving the integrity of the trial, and ensuring the reliability of the results. Institutionally chartered DSMBs meet these responsibilities but usually have fewer members, have a structure specific to the needs of the trial, are more focused and/or have different scope reviewing smaller, single site, higher risk, and investigator-initiated studies and are flexible to accommodate institution-specific requirements and approaches. Their purpose is to meet the responsibilities of oversight for safety and data integrity, ensure proper study design, rigor and conduct, as well as provide statistical support appropriate to the setting of the research. Academic health centers should recognize the importance and existence of institution level safety and data monitoring and provide support as much as possible. Investigators should have sufficient resources available to assemble DSMBs. The Clinical and Translational Science Awards Collaborative DSMB Workgroup provides an online manual to assist investigators.


Clinics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 73 (Suppl 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
RJ Arai ◽  
IL Noronha ◽  
JC Nicolau ◽  
C Schmidt ◽  
GM Albuquerque ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 334-339
Author(s):  
Sylvia Baedorf Kassis ◽  
Sabune Winkler ◽  
Min J. Gianforti ◽  
Nancy A. Needler

IntroductionResearch coordinators (RCs) are vital to the clinical research enterprise, ensuring research is conducted ethically, results are scientifically sound and human research subjects are protected. Given the absence of a prior systematic inquiry, we sought to understand the ways in which Clinical & Translational Science Award-funded academic health centers support RCs.MethodsOur survey asked questions about existing coordinator networks and where none existed, collected data on the characterization of resources and services provided to support RCs (outside of salary).ResultsFindings show 4 mechanisms support RCs: identification of the workforce, professionalization of the position, dissemination of information, and offering of services.ConclusionAn academic health center that wishes to deliver research training and services to their RC workforce will need identification and communication structures in place before supportive activities can be effectively implemented.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document