THE ROLE OF THE ILEUM IN FOOD INTAKE REGULATION

2009 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 228-229
2018 ◽  
Vol 818 ◽  
pp. 43-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahra. Mirmohammadsadeghi ◽  
Masoud. Shareghi Brojeni ◽  
Abbas. Haghparast ◽  
Afsaneh. Eliassi

1999 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 37-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. L. Ingvartsen ◽  
N. C. Friggens ◽  
P. Faverdin

AbstractThe dip in food intake, which starts in late pregnancy and continues into early lactation, has traditionally been interpreted as a depression in intake due to physical constraints. However, the rôle of physical constraints on intake has been overemphasized, particularly in early lactation. There is mounting evidence that the presence and mobilization of body reserves in early lactation play an important rôle in regulating intake at this time.Conceptually, the dip in intake in early lactation observed when cows have access to non-limiting foods can be accounted for by assuming that the cow has a desired level of body reserves. When the cow is not compromised, the changes with time in body reserves and the dip in intake represent the normal case and provide the basis against which to assess true depressions in intake which may occur when the cow is compromised by limiting nutrition or environment.The regulation of body reserves and intake in the periparturient cow is orchestrated through nervous and hormonal signals. Likely factors that are involved in intake regulation are reproductive hormones, neuropeptides, adrenergic signals, insulin and insulin resistance and leptin. Furthermore, oxidation of NEFA in the liver may result in feedback signals that reduce intake. The relative importance of these is discussed. A better understanding of the physiological signals involved in intake regulation and their interrelations with body weight regulation may provide important indicators of the degree of compromise that periparturient cows may experience.


Gut ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (9) ◽  
pp. 1620-1628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sei Higuchi ◽  
Tiara R Ahmad ◽  
Donovan A Argueta ◽  
Pedro A Perez ◽  
Chen Zhao ◽  
...  

ObjectivesLipid mediators in the GI tract regulate satiation and satiety. Bile acids (BAs) regulate the absorption and metabolism of dietary lipid in the intestine, but their effects on lipid-regulated satiation and satiety are completely unknown. Investigating this is challenging because introducing excessive BAs or eliminating BAs strongly impacts GI functions. We used a mouse model (Cyp8b1–/– mice) with normal total BA levels, but alterations in the composition of the BA pool that impact multiple aspects of intestinal lipid metabolism. We tested two hypotheses: BAs affect food intake by (1) regulating production of the bioactive lipid oleoylethanolamide (OEA), which enhances satiety; or (2) regulating the quantity and localisation of hydrolysed fat in small intestine, which controls gastric emptying and satiation.DesignWe evaluated OEA levels, gastric emptying and food intake in wild-type and Cyp8b1–/– mice. We assessed the role of the fat receptor GPR119 in these effects using Gpr119–/– mice.ResultsCyp8b1–/– mice on a chow diet showed mild hypophagia. Jejunal OEA production was blunted in Cyp8b1–/– mice, thus these data do not support a role for this pathway in the hypophagia of Cyp8b1–/– mice. On the other hand, Cyp8b1 deficiency decreased gastric emptying, and this was dependent on dietary fat. GPR119 deficiency normalised the gastric emptying, gut hormone levels, food intake and body weight of Cyp8b1–/– mice.ConclusionBAs regulate gastric emptying and satiation by determining fat-dependent GPR119 activity in distal intestine.


Nutrition ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 786-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuhiko Minokoshi ◽  
Tetsuya Shiuchi ◽  
Suni Lee ◽  
Atsushi Suzuki ◽  
Shiki Okamoto

Author(s):  
Cristina Velasco ◽  
Marta Conde-Sieira ◽  
Sara Comesaña ◽  
Mauro Chivite ◽  
Jesús M. Míguez ◽  
...  

We evaluated the role of GPR84 and GPR119 in food intake regulation in fish using rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) as a model. In a first experiment, we assessed the effects on food intake of intracerebroventricular treatment with agonists of these receptors. In a second experiment, we assessed in hypothalamus and hindbrain the impact of the same treatments on mRNA abundance of neuropeptides involved in the metabolic control of food intake (npy, agrp1, pomca1, and cartpt) as well as in changes in parameters related to signalling pathways and transcription factors involved in the integrative response leading to neuropeptide production. Treatment with both agonists elicited an anorectic response in rainbow trout attributable to changes observed in the mRNA abundance of the four neuropeptides. Changes in neuropeptides relate to changes observed in mRNA abundance and phosphorylation status of the transcription factor Foxo1. These changes occurred in parallel with changes in phosphorylation status of Ampkα and Akt, mRNA abundance of mTOR as well as in signalling pathways related to PLCβ and IP3. These results allow us to suggest that 1) at least part of the capacity of fish brain to sense MCFA like octanoate depends on the function of GPR84, and 2) the capacity of fish brain to sense NAE or triglyceride-derived molecules through binding of these ligands to GPR119.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document