In-vivo and in-vitro evaluations of a modified-release oral dosage form of nifedipine by hybridization of hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin and hydroxypropylcelluloses in dogs

1994 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 505-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZHENG WANG ◽  
FUMITOSHI HIRAYAMA ◽  
KANETO UEKAMA
2019 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 177-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ehsan Kaffash ◽  
Farinaz Saremnejad ◽  
Mohammadreza Abbaspour ◽  
Seyed Ahmad Mohajeri ◽  
Hadi Afrasiabi Garekani ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 548-562
Author(s):  
Matthias Shona Roost ◽  
Henrike Potthast ◽  
Chantal Walther ◽  
Alfredo García-Arieta ◽  
Ivana Abalos ◽  
...  

This article describes an overview of waivers of in vivo bioequivalence studies for additional strengths in the context of the registration of modified release generic products and is a follow-up to the recent publication for the immediate release solid oral dosage forms. The current paper is based on a survey among the participating members of the Bioequivalence Working Group for Generics (BEWGG) of the International Pharmaceutical Regulators Program (IPRP) regarding this topic. Most jurisdictions consider the extrapolation of bioequivalence results obtained with one (most sensitive) strength of a product series as less straightforward for modified release products than for immediate release products. There is consensus that modified release products should demonstrate bioequivalence not only in the fasted state but also in the fed state, but differences exist regarding the necessity of additional multiple dose studies. Fundamental differences between jurisdictions are revealed regarding requirements on the quantitative composition of different strengths and the differentiation of single and multiple unit dosage forms. Differences in terms of in vitro dissolution requirements are obvious, though these are mostly related to possible additional comparative investigations rather than regarding the need for product-specific methods. As with the requirements for immediate release products, harmonization of the various regulations for modified release products is highly desirable to conduct the appropriate studies from a scientific point of view, thus ensuring therapeutic equivalence.


2014 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 65-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Chen ◽  
Liang Chen ◽  
Haicheng Li ◽  
Yuhui Chen ◽  
Huixin Guo ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshinori Ebato ◽  
Yoshinori Kato ◽  
Hiraku Onishi ◽  
Tsuneji Nagai ◽  
Yoshiharu Machida

Author(s):  
Akhilesh Kumar Singh ◽  
Neeraj Sharma

Over the last few years, therapeutic efficacy of drugs that have poor bioavailability or narrow absorption window have challenged the pharmaceutical industry. In this framework, many Hydrodynamic Balance System (HBS) also known as Gastro retentive dosage forms (GRDFs) have been used to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of drugs. Such drug have a narrow absorption window, are unstable at higher pH, are soluble in acidic conditions, and are local effect in the gastric-part. The drug development with recent technology of various novel polymeric-based gastroretentive drug delivery technologies that may regulate the bioavailability and extend time of therapeutic efficacy of such drugs. Our focus on the significance of in vitro study and in vivo evaluation parameters of various HBS drugs along with their applications.  This study provides a promising platform for advantages and guide formulation of HBS dosage form were covered in detail.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document