scholarly journals The influence of mean arterial pressure on the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy in minor stroke or transient ischemic attack patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 598-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Ma ◽  
Ying Liu ◽  
Jie Xu ◽  
Yilong Wang ◽  
Fenghe Du ◽  
...  
Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Anadani ◽  
Adam de Havenon ◽  
Nils Henninger ◽  
Lindsey Kuohn ◽  
Brian Mac Grory ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: Dual antiplatelet therapy has been shown to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke in patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack. However, whether the effect of dual antiplatelet therapy is modified by pretreatment antiplatelet status is unclear. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of the POINT trial (Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke). Patients were divided into 2 groups based on pretreatment antiplatelet use. The primary outcome was ischemic stroke within 90 days of randomization. Results: We included 4881 patients of whom 41% belonged to the no pretreatment antiplatelet. Ischemic stroke occurred in 6% and 5% in the antiplatelet pretreatment and no antiplatelet pretreatment, respectively. Antiplatelet pretreatment was not associated with the risk of ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.81–137]) or risk of major hemorrhage (hazard ratio, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.55–2.21]; P =0.794). The effect of dual antiplatelet therapy on recurrent ischemic stroke risk was not different in patients who were on antiplatelet before randomization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.50–0.94]) as opposed to those who were not (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.50–1.12]), P for interaction = 0.685. Conclusions: In patients with minor stroke and high-risk transient ischemic attack, dual antiplatelet therapy reduces the risk of ischemic stroke regardless of premorbid antiplatelet use.


2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Jing ◽  
Xia Meng ◽  
Xingquan Zhao ◽  
Liping Liu ◽  
Anxin Wang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. svn-2019-000319
Author(s):  
Peng Wang ◽  
Mengyuan Zhou ◽  
Yuesong Pan ◽  
Xia Meng ◽  
Xingquan Zhao ◽  
...  

BackgroundWhether to treat minor stroke with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) treatment or antiplatelet therapy is a dilemma. Our study aimed to explore whether intravenous t-PA treatment, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and aspirin have different efficacies on outcomes in patients with minor stroke.MethodsA post hoc analysis of patients with acute minor stroke treated with intravenous t-PA within 4.5 hours from a nationwide multicentric electronic medical record and patients with acute minor stroke treated with DAPT and aspirin from the Clopidogrel with Aspirin in Acute Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack Database. Minor stroke was defined by a score of 0–3 on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at randomisation. Favourable functional outcome (defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–1 or 0–2 at 3 months).ResultsCompared with those treated with intravenous t-PA, no significant association with 3-month favourable functional outcome (defined as mRS score of 0–1) was found neither in patients treated with aspirin (87.8% vs 89.4%; OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.46 to 1.50; p=0.53) nor those treated with DAPT (87.4% vs 89.4%; OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.46 to 1.52; p=0.56). Similar results were observed for the favourable functional outcome defined as mRS score of 0–2 at 3 months.ConclusionsIn our study, no significant advantage of intravenous t-PA over DAPT or aspirin was found. Due to insufficient sample size, our study is probably unable to draw such a conclusion that that intravenous t-PA was superior or non-superior to DAPT.


Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Song ◽  
Lu L Pei ◽  
Kai Liu ◽  
Yuan Cao ◽  
Ming M Ning ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 745-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Claiborne Johnston ◽  
Pierre Amarenco ◽  
Hans Denison ◽  
Scott R Evans ◽  
Anders Himmelmann ◽  
...  

Rationale In patients with acute cerebral ischemia, the rate of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death during 90 days was reported to be non-significantly lower with ticagrelor compared with aspirin, with no increase in major hemorrhage. Dual antiplatelet therapy may be more effective in this setting. Aim To investigate whether ticagrelor combined with aspirin are superior to aspirin alone in preventing stroke or death in patients with non-severe, non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack. Design The Acute Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack Treated with Ticagrelor and Aspirin for Prevention of Stroke and Death (THALES) trial is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, event-driven study. Patients will be randomized within 24 h of onset of acute ischemic symptoms. THALES is expected to randomize 13,000 at ∼450 sites worldwide, to collect 764 primary outcome events. Study treatments are ticagrelor 180 mg loading dose on day 1, then 90 mg twice daily on days 2–30, or matching placebo. All patients will also receive open-label aspirin 300–325 mg on day 1, then 75–100 mg once daily on days 2–30. Study outcomes The primary efficacy outcome is time to the composite endpoint of stroke or death through 30-day follow-up. The primary safety outcome is time to first severe bleeding event. Discussion The THALES trial will provide important information about the benefits and risks of dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor and aspirin in patients with acute cerebral ischemia in a global setting (funding: AstraZeneca). Clinical Trial Registration URL http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03354429.


Author(s):  
Valeria Cristina Scavasine ◽  
Rubens Mendes Barbosa ◽  
Francisco Diego Negrao Lopes Neto ◽  
Francisco Manoel Branco Germininani ◽  
Rodrigo Bazan ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (11) ◽  
pp. 3472-3474
Author(s):  
Yunyun Xiong ◽  
Philip M. Bath

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu-lu Pei ◽  
Pei Chen ◽  
Hui Fang ◽  
Yuan Cao ◽  
Yi-nan Guo ◽  
...  

Abstract Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reduced stroke risk in high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients assessed by ABCD2 score. Patients with positive diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were identified as imaging-based high-risk. The present study aims to investigate whether DAPT could reduce stroke risk in TIA with DWI positive. The study enrolled TIA patients within 72 h of onset from the prospective TIA database of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. The predictive outcome was ischemic stroke at 90-day. The relationship between DAPT and stroke was analyzed in a cox proportional hazards model. The Kaplan–Meier curves of TIA patients with DAPT and monotherapy were plotted. Total of 661 TIA patients were enrolled, 279 of whom were DWI positive and 281 used DAPT. The 90-day stroke risk was higher in patients used monotherapy than those used DAPT in TIA with positive DWI (23.7% vs. 13.4%, p = 0.029). DAPT was associated with reduced stroke risk in TIA patients with positive DWI (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30–0.97; p = 0.037). However, the benefit didn’t exist in TIA patients with negative DWI (HR = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.14–1.33; p = 0.142). Early use of DAPT reduced stroke risk in TIA patients with positive DWI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document